Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Where to Grasp a Tool?

Task-Dependent Adjustments of Tool Transformations by Tool Users

Published Online:February 28, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000089

Abstract

Biomechanical and environmental constraints limit body movements and tool use actions. However, in the case of tool use, such constraints can often be overcome by adjusting a tool’s tool transformation to the requirements of the intended tool use action. The research presented here examined whether participants grasped a lever at different positions, thus modifying the lever’s tool transformation, to accommodate speed and accuracy requirements of different tasks. Participants were asked to quickly track a sequence of targets with the lever. If accuracy requirements were high, participants compensated for limits in the accuracy of hand movements by grasping the lever at a position that enabled precise control of the lever. If accuracy requirements were low, participants compensated for limits in hand speed by grasping the lever at a position that enabled fast lever movements with comparatively slow hand movements. This task-dependent grasp selection was only present after participants had practiced the tasks. The data show that in addition to adapting to fixed tool transformations, participants also actively controlled tool transformations to facilitate tool use actions.

References

  • Abeele, S. , Bock, O. (2001). Sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual input: Different mechanisms for small versus large rotations. Experimental Brain Research, 140, 407–410. doi: 10.1007/s002210100846 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Abeele, S. , Bock, O. (2003). Transfer of sensorimotor adaptation between different movement categories. Experimental Brain Research, 148, 128–132. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Berthier, N. E. (1996). Learning to reach: A mathematical model. Developmental Psychology, 32, 811–823. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Butz, M. V. , Lenhard, A. , Herbort, O. (2007). Emergent effector-independent internal spaces: Adaptation and intermanual learning transfer in humans and neural networks. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2007, 1970–1975. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, R. G. , Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 486–495. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1862-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Coren, S. (1993). The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 1–3. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 381–391. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Harris, C. M. , Wolpert, D. M. (1998). Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature, 394, 780–784. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Herbort, O. , Butz, M. V. (2010). Planning and control of hand orientation in grasping movements. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 867–878. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2191-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Herbort, O. , Butz, M. V. (2011a). The continuous end-state comfort effect: Weighted integration of multiple biases. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0334-7 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Herbort, O. , Butz, M. V. (2011b). Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling. Experimental Brain Research, 213, 371–382. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2787-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krakauer, J. W. , Ghilardi, M.-F. , Ghez, C. (1999). Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1026–1031. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kunde, W. , Müsseler, J. , Heuer, H. (2007). Spatial compatibility effects with tool use. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 49, 661–670. doi: 10.1518/001872007X215737 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Loftus, G. R. , Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Massen, C. , Prinz, W. (2007). Programming tool-use actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 692–704. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.692 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mazzoni, P. , Krakauer, J. W. (2006). An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 3642–3645. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mosier, K. M. , Scheidt, R. A. , Acosta, S. , Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (2005). Remapping hand movements in a novel geometrical environment. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 4362–4372. doi: 10.1152/jn.00380.2005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenbaum, D. A. (2008). Reaching while walking: Reaching distance costs more than walking distance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1100–1104. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1100 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenbaum, D. A. , Marchak, F. , Barnes, H. J. , Vaughan, J. , Siotta, J. D. , Jorgensen, M. J. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod, (Ed.), Attention and performance, (Vol. XIII, pp. 321–345). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sailer, U. , Flanagan, J. R. , Johansson, R. S. (2005). Eye-hand coordination during learning of a novel visuomotor task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 8833–8842. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sülzenbrück, S. , Heuer, H. (2009a). Functional independence of explicit and implicit motor adjustments. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 145–159. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.12.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sülzenbrück, S. , Heuer, H. (2009b). Learning the visuomotor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers: Simple approximations of complex transformations. Experimental Brain Research, 195, 153–165. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1764-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tong, C. , Flanagan, J. R. (2003). Task-specific internal models for kinematic transformations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 578–585. doi: 10.1152/jn.01087.2002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Trommershäuser, J. , Maloney, L. T. , & Landy, M. S. (2003). Statistical decision theory and trade-offs in the control of motor response. Spatial Vision, 16, 255–275. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wulf, G. , Schmidt, R. A. (1997). Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 987–1006. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar