A Multiple Pathway Model Linking Charismatic Leadership Attempts and Abusive Supervision
Abstract
Researchers have theorized about a link between destructive and charismatic leadership but have left this link rather unspecified. This paper discusses charismatic leadership as an antecedent of abusive supervision. Based on the charismatic leadership process, it specifies five distinct pathways that may lead from charismatic leadership attempts to abusive supervision: Overdramatized charisma with abusive supervision as an unintended consequence, overambitious charisma with abusive supervision as a stress reaction, refused charisma with abusive supervision as a reaction to frustration and provocation, disappointed charisma with abusive supervision as a reaction to threatened self-esteem and negative affect, and abandoned charisma with abusive supervision as a volitional change of influence tactics. This paper aims to introduce these five pathways resulting in theoretical propositions that may inspire future empirical research.
References
2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191–201.
(1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47, 755–778.
(2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 45–68.
(2007). Pseudo-transformational leadership: Towards the development and test of a model. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 851–861.
(1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
(2012). Relationships between bullying behaviours and the Dark Triad: A study with adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 571–575.
(2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351–355.
(1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 59–73.
(2009). Leader-follower values congruence: Are socialized charismatic leaders better able to achieve it? The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 478–490.
(2012). Supervisor workplace stress and abusive supervision: The buffering effect of exercise. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 271–279.
(2014). The depleted leader: The influence of leaders’ diminished psychological resources on leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 344–357.
(1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 297–311.
(2007). Violence restrained: Effects of self-regulation and its depletion on aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 62–76.
(1939). Frustration and aggression. Oxford, UK: Yale University Press.
(2004). Leadership and cultural variation: The identification of culturally endorsed leadership profiles. In , Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 669–720). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20, 16–27.
(2008). The interactive relationship of competitive climate and trait competitiveness with workplace attitudes, stress, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 899–922.
(2010). Development of the competitive work environment scale: A multidimensional climate construct. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 105–124.
(2003). Action training for charismatic leadership: Two evaluations of studies of a commercial training module on inspirational communication of a vision. Personnel Psychology, 56, 671–697.
(2011). Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 61–76.
(2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495–525.
(2011). Abusive supervisory reactions to coworker relationship conflict. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1010–1023.
(2014). Abusive supervision and the entitled employee. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 204–217.
(2014). What have I done to deserve this? Effects of employee personality and emotion on abusive supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 461–474.
(2011). “Incivility, social undermining, bullying. Oh my!”: A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 499–519.
(2006). Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1125–1133.
(2013). A model of injustice, abusive supervision, and negative affect. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 256–269.
(1992). Personality and charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 3, 81–108.
(1992). The ethics of charismatic leadership: Submission or liberation? Academy of Management Executive, 6, 43–54.
(1982). Groupthink. Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
(2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386–408.
(2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 521–526.
(2012). On the value of aiming high: The causes and consequences of ambition. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 758–775.
(2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768.
(2012). Sins of the parents: Self-control as a buffer between supervisors’ previous experience of family undermining and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervision. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 869–882.
(1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 36–51.
(2014). Engulfed in the abyss: The emergence of abusive supervision as an escalating process of supervisor-subordinate interaction. Human Relations, 67, 311–332.
(1995). On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 183–198.
(2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 39, 1308–1338.
(2012). Strength in numbers How employees’ acts of followership can influence their manager’s charismatic leadership behavior. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 220, 251–261.
(2014). Blame it on the supervisor or the subordinate? Reciprocal relations between abusive supervision and organizational deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 651–664.
(2012). The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1187–1212.
(2008). Navigating the bind of necessary evils: Psychological engagement and the production of interpersonally sensitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 847–872.
(2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, S120–S137.
(2007). The role, function, and contribution of attribution theory to leadership: A review. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 561–585.
(2014). Supervisors’ exceedingly difficult goals and abusive supervision: The mediating effects of hindrance stress, anger, and anxiety. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 358–372.
(2012). A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 65, 325–357.
(1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1, 894–904.
(2003). A theoretical model of triggered displaced aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 75–97.
(2012). The bedside manner of homo economics: How and why priming an economic schema reduces compassion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 27–37.
(2006). Pathways to outstanding leadership: A comparative analysis of charismatic ideological, and pragmatic leaders. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.
(1994). Implicit leadership theories: Content, structure, and generalizability. The Leadership Quarterly, 5, 43–58.
(2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 176–194.
(2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 379–408.
(2012). Despite leaders’ good intentions? The role of follower attributions in adverse leadership – A multilevel model. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 220, 241–250. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000118
(2006). Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 559–576.
(2011). When distress hits home: The role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 713–729.
(2013). When leaders victimize. The role of charismatic leaders in facilitating group pressures. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 189–202.
(1995). The charismatic leader as narcissist: Understanding the abuse of power. Organizational Dynamics, 23, 57–71.
(2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 138–158.
(2011). Leadership takes time: Some implications of (not) taking time seriously in leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 307–315.
(1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577–594.
(2014). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, S41–S60.
(2005). Employee cynicism and resistance to organizational change. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 429–499.
(1998). Charisma and the archetypes of leadership. Organization Studies, 19, 807–828.
(2006). Ego depletion and aggressive behavior: Is the inhibition of aggression a limited resource? European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 1–13.
(2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–322.
(2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.
(2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33, 261–289.
(2011). A case for recognizing distinctions among constructs that capture interpersonal mistreatment in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 487–498.
(2011). Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 279–294.
(2013). A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? Academy of Management Annals, 7, 1–60.
(2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 17–24.
(1921/1980). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie
([Economy and society. An outline of interpretative sociology] (5th ed.). Tübingen, Germany: Mohr.1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 285–305.
(1990). Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 132–140.
(2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York, NY: Random House.
(