Parents’ and Teachers’ Opinions on Bullying and Cyberbullying Prevention
The Relevance of Their Own Children’s or Students’ Involvement
Abstract
Abstract. The goals of the present study were (1) to examine parents’ and teachers’ opinions on bullying and cyberbullying prevention, and (2) to investigate whether the involvement of their children or students in bullying affects their opinions. Altogether, 959 adults (466 parents, 493 teachers) reported on their opinions. More than 95% of parents and teachers regarded bullying as an important topic. Cyberbullying was seen as the least serious form and physical bullying as the most serious one. Ninety-five percent of parents and 90% of teachers stated that they would accept a bullying prevention program; 61% of parents and 75% of teachers were willing to actively participate in bullying prevention; 34% of parents and 66% of teachers reported that their own children or students were victims of bullying. This involvement moderated teachers’ opinions. Teachers of students affected by bullying rated verbal and cyberbullying as more serious, accepted prevention programs more readily, and were more willing to actively participate in a program compared to teachers whose students were not involved.
References
2000). Correlates of bullying and victimization among intermediate students in the midwestern USA. School Psychology International, 21, 65–78.
(2008). Teacher adherence and its relation to teacher attitudes and student outcomes in an elementary school-based violence prevention program. School Psychology Review, 37, 533–549.
(2010). Beyond hurt feelings: Investigating why some victims of bullying are at greater risk for suicidal ideation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 420–442.
(2014). Tapping into the power of school climate to prevent bullying: One application of schoolwide positive behavior interventions and supports. Theory Into Practice, 53, 300–307. doi: 10.1080/00405841.2014.947224
(2015). How teachers respond to school bullying: An examination of self-reported intervention strategy use, moderator effects, and concurrent use of multiple strategies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 191–202. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2015.07.004
(2012). “Under the radar”: Educators and cyberbullying in schools. School Psychology International, 33, 520–532. doi: 10.1177/0143034312445245
(2008). New perspectives on bullying. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
(2011). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding school-based bullying. Canadian Journal of Education
(Revue Canadienne de L’éducation . 34, 21–33.2000). Prospective teachers’ attitudes toward bullying and victimization. School Psychology International, 21, 5–21. doi: 10.1177/0143034300211001
(1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x
(2016). What limits the effectiveness of antibullying programs? A thematic analysis of the perspective of teachers. Journal of School Violence, 15, 460–482. doi: 10.1080/15388220.2015.1095100
(2010). Cyber-victimisation: The association between help-seeking behaviours and self-reported emotional symptoms in Australia and Austria. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20, 194–209. doi: 10.1375/ajgc.20.2.194
(2013). Teachers’ attitudes toward different types of bullying and victimization in Turkey. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 987–1002. doi: 10.1002/pits.21729
(2004). Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2009). School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2009, 6.
(2012). Successful bullying prevention programs: Influence of research design, implementation features, and program components. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6, 273–282. Received from http://ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/viewFile/245/pdf_65
(2006). Do bullied children become anxious and depressed adults? A cross-sectional investigation of the correlates of bullying and anxious depression. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 201–208. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000202491.99719.c3
(2005). Bullying, psychological adjustment, and academic performance in elementary school. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159, 1026–1031. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.11.1026
(2009). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Identification of risk groups for adjustment problems. The Journal of Psychology, 217, 205–213. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.205
(2012).
(Motives for bullying others in cyberspace: A study on bullies and bully-victims in Austria . In Q. LiD. CrossP. SmithEds., Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives (pp. 263–284). Chichester, UK: Wiley.2014). Prevention of cyberbullying and cyber victimization: Evaluation of the ViSC social competence program. Journal of School Violence, 14, 87–110. doi: 10.1080/15388220.2014.963231
(2016). Effectiveness and sustainability of the ViSC social competence program to prevent cyberbullying and cyber-victimization: Class and individual level moderators. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 181–193. doi: 10.1002/ab.21631
(2017). Who is responsible for addressing cyberbullying? Perspectives from teachers and senior managers. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 5, 100–114. doi: 10.1080/21683603.2016.1194240
(2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10, 512–527. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00178
(2016). Growing up unequal: Gender and socioeconomic differences in young people’s health and well-being. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2013/2014 survey. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
(2008). Long-term consequences of victimization by peers: A follow-up from adolescence to young adulthood. European Journal of Developmental Science, 2, 387–397. doi: 10.3233/DEV-2008-2404
(2000). Peer harassment, psychological adjustment, and school functioning in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 349–359. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.349
(2000). Bullying at school: An indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 661–674. doi: 10.1006/jado.2000.0351
(2007). Bullying, depression, and suicidality in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 40–49. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000242237.84925.18
(2009). Tackling bullying: Victimized by peers as a pupil, an effective intervener as a teacher? Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1000–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.005
(2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073–1137. doi: 10.1037/a0035618
(2006). Cyberbullying in schools. A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27, 157–170. doi: 10.1177/0143034306064547
(2012). Empowering students against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of an Italian peer-led model. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6, 314–321. doi: 10.4119/UNIBI/ijcv.253
(2001). Bullying behaviors among us youth. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.16.2094
(1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
(2012). Knowing, building and living together on internet and social networks: The conred cyberbullying prevention program. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6, 303–313. doi: 10.4119/UNIBI/ijcv.250
(2013). Das Präventionsprogramm Surf-Fair gegen Cybermobbing – Eine Einführung
([The prevention program Surf-Fair against cyberbullying – An introduction] . Psychologie in Oesterreich, 33, 14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.0071989).
(A system oriented strategy against bullying . In E. RolandE. MuntheEds., Bullying: An international perspective (pp. 143–151). London, UK: David Fulton.2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120.
(2014). Measuring implementation of a school-based violence prevention program on two levels. Fidelity and teachers’ responsiveness as predictors of proximal outcomes. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 222, 49–57. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000165
(2014). Prävention von Cybermobbing und Reduzierung aggressiven Verhaltens Jugendlicher durch das Programm Medienhelden. Ergebnisse einer Evaluationsstudie
([Prevention of cyberbullying and reduction of adolescents’ aggressive behavior using the “Medienhelden” program. Results from an evaluation study] . Diskurs Kindheits-und Jugendforschung, 9, 61–79.2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact on secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
(1994). School bullying: Insights and perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
(2011). National strategy for violence prevention in Austrian schools and kindergarten: Development and implementation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 412–418. doi: 10.1177/0165025411407458
(2010). Prevention of bullying-related morbidity and mortality: A call for public health policies. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 403. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.077123
(2012). Gewalterfahrungen von Jugendlichen. Prävalenzen und Risikogruppen
([Adolescent’s experiences of violence: Prevalence and groups at risk] . PISA 2009. Nationale Zusatzerhebungen. Münster, Germany: Waxmann, 165–208.2011).
(Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review . In F. EderEd., Journal of Experimental Criminology (pp. 27–56). 7. doi: 10.1007/s11292-010-9109-12013). Effects of the KiVa antibullying program on cyberbullying and cybervictimization frequency among finnish youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42, 820–833. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.787623
(2016). Dynamic change of aggressive behavior and victimization among adolescents: Effectiveness of the ViSC program. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, . doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1233498
(2004). Predicting teacher interventions in bullying situations. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 37–45.
(