Abstract
Abstract. In the past decades, marketing practitioners have embraced social norms as a powerful instrument of influencing consumers’ behavior. An important distinction has been made between descriptive norms (what most others do) and injunctive norms (what others approve of), and this meta-analysis across 297 studies examines the effects of these types of social norms on consumer decision-making processes. We argue that descriptive norms directly influence behavior, and consequently that their effect on behavior should be stronger than that of injunctive norms. Injunctive norms, by contrast, should be more strongly related to intentions than descriptive norms. Results of the meta-analysis support these predictions, and furthermore provide new insights into the moderating effects of aspects of the norm (specificity of the norm, norm source) and of the target person (gender, age).
References
2003). The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.18
(1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
(2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142
(2005). Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach (8th ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
(2014). An empirical investigation of partial effect sizes in meta-analysis of correlational data. Journal of General Psychology, 141, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2013.853021
(2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
(2010). Does exclusivity always pay off? Exclusive price promotions and consumer response. Journal of Marketing, 74, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.2.121
(2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
(2014a). Fixed- and random-effects meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Examples and analyses in R. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0361-y
(2014b). metaSEM: An R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521
(2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10, 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.40
(2002). Attitudes and intentions of homeless people towards service provision in South Wales. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602760060101
(2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
(1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
(1998).
(Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance . In D. T. GilbertS. T. FiskeG. LindzeyEds., The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151–192). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.2003). A failed norms social marketing campaign. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 409–414. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2003.64.409
(2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004
(1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
(2015). Bidirectional associations between descriptive and injunctive norms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 127, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.09.011
(1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/258231
(1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
(2009). The impact of socially conveyed norms on the reporting of sexual behavior and attitudes by men and women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 567–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.007
(2001). Challenging the collegiate rite of passage: A campus-wide social marketing media campaign to reduce binge drinking. Journal of Drug Education, 31, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.2190/U466-EPFG-Q76D-YHTQ
(2010). Descriptive normative beliefs and conversation behavior: The moderating roles of personal involvement and injunctive normative beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.643
(2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/586910
(1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.186
(2009). Fear and loving in Las Vegas: Evolution, emotion, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.3.384
(2012). The evolutionary bases for sustainable behavior: Implications for marketing, policy, and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31, 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.11.040
(2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
(2011). Bodies obliged and unbound: Differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021470
(2006). “We always have a beer after the meeting”: How norms, customs, conventions, and the like explain behavior. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36, 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393106289791
(2012). Following what people think we should do versus what people actually do: Elaboration as a moderator of the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611420481
(2015). Is it really love? A comparative investigation of the emotional nature of brand and interpersonal love. Psychology & Marketing, 32, 624–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20805
(2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15, 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x
(1997). Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science, 278, 45–47. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5335.45
(2000). Practical meta-analysis. London, UK: Sage.
(2009). The effects of subjective norms on behaviour in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 649–705. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X393136
(2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21, 494–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363538
(2011). To think or not to think: The effect of cognitive deliberation on the influence of injunctive versus descriptive social norms. Psychology & Marketing, 28, 709–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20408
(2013). Regulatory fit effects for injunctive versus descriptive social norms: Evidence from the promotion of sustainable products. Marketing Letters, 24, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9234-5
(2018). The mechanism of the social norms’ influence on consumer decision making: A meta-analysis. [Supplementary material]. Trier, Germany: ZPID. http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.921
(2009). Are women more loyal customers than men? Gender differences in loyalty to firms and individual service providers. Journal of Marketing, 73, 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.4.82
(2004). Cruel choices: Autonomy and critical care decision-making. Bioethics, 18, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00384.x
(2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Open Medicine, 3, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
. (1997). The use of likelihood-based confidence intervals in genetic models. Behavior Genetics, 27, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025681223921
(1990). Avoiding social traps: Some conditions that maintain adherence to restricted consumption. Social Behaviour, 5, 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X449395
(2010). Attitudes, norms, identity, and environmental behavior: Using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 259–284.
(2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316691
(1997). Standpoint explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects of varying conclusion articulation in persuasive messages. Argumentation and Advocacy, 34, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1997.11978023
(2002). Persuasion: Theory and research (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
(2002). Clarifying the contribution of subjective norm to predicting leisure-time exercise. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26, 296–305. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.26.4.6
(2011). Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy Policy, 39, 2217–2227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.024
(1999). Age differences in response to conformity pressure for emotional and nonemotional material. Psychology and Aging, 14, 170–174. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.14.1.170
(2004). Influence of social norms and palatability on amount consumed and food choice. Appetite, 42, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2003.12.001
(2016). Using social norms to encourage sustainable behaviour: A meta-analysis. Psichologija, 53, 44–58. https://doi.org/10.15388/Psichol.2016.53.10031
(2018). Investigating pro-environmental behaviors of Lithuanian university students. Current Psychology, 37, 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9506-3
(2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.104
(2005). How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research, 32, 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205275385
(2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 22, 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-003-1018-2
(Rothstein, H. R.Sutton, A. J.Borenstein, M. (Eds.). (2006). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
2011). The role of reinforcement and punishment. In Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 278–288). New York, NY: Worth.
(2007). The constructive, destructive and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
(1983). Toward Pepitone’s vision of a normative social psychology: What is a social norm? Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4, 275–293.
(1999). Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 90–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.90
(1999). Predicting intentions to use condoms: A meta-analysis and comparison of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1624–1675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02045.x
(1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1086/209170
(1987). Averaging correlation coefficients: Should Fisher’s z transformation be used? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 146–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.1.146
(2004). Social groups in action and interaction. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2014). How negative descriptive norms for healthy eating undermine the effects of positive injunctive norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12223
(1986).
(The social identity theory of intergroup behavior . In W. G. AustinS. WorchelEds., Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.2000). Attitude-behaviour relations: The role of in-group norms and mode of behavioural decision-making. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164534
(2000).
(Attitude-behavior relations: Social identity and group membership . In D. J. TerryM. A. HoggEds., Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 67–94). London, UK: Erlbaum.2008). Social norms and cooperation in real-life social dilemmas. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.12.004
(2003). Perception and reality: A national evaluation of social norms marketing interventions to reduce college students’ heavy alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 484–494. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2003.64.484
(2013). When do (and don’t) normative appeals influence sustainable consumer behaviors? Journal of Marketing, 77, 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0278
(2006). A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of neural dissociations between brand and person judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1086/504132
(