The Impact of Evidence Type on Police Investigators’ Perceptions of Suspect Culpability and Evidence Reliability
Abstract
Abstract. In a repeated-measures experimental study, we examined how evidence type influences police investigators’ beliefs about (a) suspect’s culpability and (b) reliability of incriminating evidence. South Korean detectives (N = 202) read four crime reports including general information about a crime and a suspect. In the general case information, one piece of critical and several pieces of noncritical evidence collected during the investigation were presented. Officers read four simulated reports of crimes, and in each report, they were given one piece of evidence linking the suspect to the crime. We manipulated the critical evidence identifying the suspect with four evidence types: CCTV, DNA, fingerprint, and eyewitness testimony. We found that evidence type influenced detectives’ judgments about suspect’s culpability and evidence reliability, such that when eyewitness (vs. CCTV, DNA, fingerprint) evidence was given as critical evidence, officers were more likely to think that the suspect was less culpable and that the evidence was less reliable. Theoretical and legal implications of these results are discussed.
References
(2018). Prosecutors’ perspectives on biological evidence and injury evidence in sexual assault cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518778259
(2010).
Investigators’ decision making . In P. A. GranhagEd., Forensic psychology in context: Nordic and international perspectives (pp. 35–55). Cullompton, UK: Willan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315094038(2018).
Investigative decision making . In A. GriffithsR. MilneEds., The psychology of criminal investigation. From theory to practice (pp. 52–73). London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637211-4(2007). Motivational bias in criminal investigators’ judgments of witness reliability 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 561–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00175.x
(2011). Investigators under influence: How social norms activate goal‐directed processing of criminal evidence. Applied cognitive psychology, 25, 548–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1724
(2008). The “elasticity” of criminal evidence: a moderator of investigator bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1245–1259. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1432
(2010). Crime-show-viewing habits and public attitudes toward forensic evidence: The “CSI effect” revisited. Justice System Journal, 31, 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2010.10767956
(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
(2018). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. (R package version 1.2-2). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr
(2013). The prosecutor’s interview with suspects in South Korea. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 41, 322–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2013.07.007
(2018). Prosecutors’ role and their relationship with the police in South Korea: In a comparative perspective. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 55, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2018.10.003
(2018). Biases in forensic experts. Science, 360(6386), 243. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8443
(2006). Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. Forensic Science International, 156, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.017
(2008).
Decision inertia: The impact of organisations on critical incident decision-making . In L. J. AlisonJ. CregoEds., Policing critical incidents: Leadership and critical incident management (pp. 201–239). Devon, UK: Willan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817988(2016). The making of an expert detective: Thinking and deciding in criminal investigations (Doctoral dissertation, Gothenburg Univerisity). GUPEA. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/47515
(2013). Decision making and decisional tipping points in homicide investigations: An interview study of British and Norwegian detectives. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 10, 155–165.
(2016). The making of an expert detective: The role of experience in English and Norwegian police officers’ investigative decision-making. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22, 203–223.
(2006). Multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases. The Wisconsin Law Review, 2006, 291–398. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/wlr2006&div=16&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals
(1991). Discrediting victims’ allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems, 38, 213–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/800530
(1997). Convictability and discordant locales: Reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decisionmaking. Law & Society Review, 31, 531–556. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054045
(2000). The impact of DNA evidence in a child sexual assault trial. Child Maltreatment, 5, 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559500005004009
(2011). Science in the jury box: Jurors’ comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9222-8
(2019). Relevance insensitivity: A new look at some old biases. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 153, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.05.002
(2017). Examination of the “CSI effect” on perceptions of scientific and testimonial evidence in a Hong Kong Chinese sample. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61, 819–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x15611874
(2002). The “process structures” of police homicide investigations. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/42.4.669
(2003). Investigating murder: Detective work and the police response to criminal homicide. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199259427.001.0001
(1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511809477
(2020). Public beliefs about the accuracy and importance of forensic evidence in the United States. Science & Justice, 60, 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2020.01.001
(2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022599230598
(2007). The role of the public prosecutor in Korea: Is he half-judge. Journal of Korean Law, 6, 163–179. Retrieved from http://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/85109/1/1.%20The%20Role%20of%20the%20Public%20Prosecutor%20in%20Korea%20Is%20He%20Half-Judge.pdf
. (2019). The statistics of crime occurrences and arrest rates in South Korea. Retrieved from http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=132&tblId=DT_13204_2011_211
. (2018). The statistics of the results for the disposals by arrest. Retrieved from http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=135&tblId=DT_13501N_A082&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=135_13501_2&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLE
. (2019). The statistics of the results for referrals and disposals in felony crime cases. Retrieved from http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1753
(2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
(2014). The influence of naïve and media-informed beliefs on juror evaluations of forensic science evidence (Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York). Retrieved from https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/242/
(2018). The presumption of guilt in suspect interrogations: Apprehension as a trigger of confirmation bias and debiasing techniques. Law and Human Behavior, 42, 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000287
(2008). Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 27–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.14.1.27
(2017). Jurors’ perceptions of evidence: The relative influence of DNA and eyewitness testimony when presented by opposing parties. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9194-9
(2011). Asymmetrical scepticism towards criminal evidence: The role of goal- and belief-consistency. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1719
(2002). Lessons about justice from the laboratory of wrongful convictions: Tunnel vision, the construction of guilt and informer evidence. UMKC Law Review, 70, 847–864. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/umkc70&div=40&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals
(2019). Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability. Forensic Science International, 302, 109877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109877
. (2009). Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12589
(2009). Prime suspect: An examination of factors that aggravate and counteract confirmation bias in criminal investigations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15, 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017881
(1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
(2018). Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0451-z
(2013). Effect of forensic evidence on criminal justice case processing. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 58, S78–S90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12020
(2009). The influence of identification decision and DNA evidence on juror decision making 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2069–2088. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00516.x
(2007). Prosecutor, police and criminal investigation in Korea: Critical review. Journal of Korean Law, 6, 191–200. Retrieved from http://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/85111/1/3.pdf
. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
(2019). Beliefs about error rates and human judgment in forensic science. Forensic Science International, 297, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.034
(2009). Exploring the use of DNA evidence in homicide investigations: Implications for detective work and case clearance. Police Quarterly, 12, 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611109339894
(2001). A comparison of eyewitness and physical evidence on mock-juror decision making. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 614–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385480102800504
(2008). Detective intuition: The role of homicide schemas. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Liverpool). Retrieved from https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.445963
(2013). Homicide detectives’ intuition. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 10, 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1383
