How Do Astronaut Candidate Profiles Differ From Airline Pilot Profiles?
Results From the 2008/2009 ESA Astronaut Selection
Abstract
Sixteen years after the second Europe-wide astronaut selection campaign, the European Space Agency started the third campaign by putting out a call for new astronauts in 2008. Due to extreme environmental conditions, expensive scientific experiments, and high public interest, not only are the psychological requirements on a high level, but they are also wide in variety: Besides cognitive and psychomotor requirements, greater importance than in comparable campaigns was put on personality and behavioral aspects, especially regarding interpersonal aspects. The psychological selection was conducted in two steps: Phase 1 concentrated mainly on performance tests and Phase 2 focused on personality and interpersonal behavior. Out of the 902 tested candidates, 46 fulfilled the psychological requirements. Significant differences were found between the astronaut candidates and the general population as well as airline pilot candidates.
References
(2008). Development and evaluation of computerized test battery for multiple task performance in pilot selection. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 97–98.
(1997). Using the NEO-PI-R to assess the personality of US Air Force pilots. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office (AL/AO-TR-1997-0097).
(1991). Pilot personality and crew coordination: Implications for training and selection. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1, 25–44.
(1992). NEO-PI-R. Odessa, FL: PAR.
(1992). Results of the ESA study on psychological selection of astronaut candidates for Columbus mission I: Aptitude testing. Acta Astronautica, 27, 131–138.
(1994). Psychological evaluation of European astronaut applicants: Results of the 1991 selection campaign. Aviation Space Environmental Medicine, 65, 925–929.
(1992). Results of the ESA study on psychological selection of astronaut candidates for Columbus mission II: Personality assessment. Acta Astronautica, 27, 139–145.
(1987). Bewährungskontrolle eines eignungsdiagnostischen Auswahlverfahrens für angehende Verkehrsflugzeugführer
[A validity study of a selection procedure for student airline pilots] . Hamburg, Germany: DLR. DLR Research Report no. DFVLR-FB-87-34.(1996). On the relation between personality and job performance of airline pilots. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 171–178.
(2004). Computer assisted testing (CAT). In , Aviation psychology: Practice and research (pp. 123–134). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
(2008). Space psychology and psychiatry. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
(1987). Temperament Structure Scales (TSS). European Space Agency, Tech. Rep. ESA-TT-1069. Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany: ESA.
(2004). Personality evaluation of applicants in aviation. In , Aviation psychology: Practice and research (pp. 141–152). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
(2000). Job requirements of airline pilots: Results of a job analysis. In , Aviation resource management (pp. 1–8). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
. (2008). Volume 1 & 2, Mission Operations Directorate, ITCB HBP Training Working Group. Houston, TX: NASA.
(2006). The problem of commercial test training. Facts, data and anti-faking strategies. In , Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the European Association for Aviation Psychology, Sept. 24–28, 2006. Potsdam, Germany: Editors.
(2007). Astronaut selection: Method and perspectives – importance of interpersonal competencies. Presentation at the Congress: Medicine and Mobility, Cologne, Germany. In , Tagungsband zum 9. Kongress “Medizin und Mobilität” (p. 27). Cologne, September 13–15, 2007.
