Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Communication

How Formal Versus Semantic Gender Influences the Interpretation of Person Denotations

Published Online:October 23, 2006https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.65.3.157

Abstract

Two studies assessed how gender-marked person denotations in German are interpreted in contrast to their unmarked counterparts in English. Participants read sentences about national groups denoted by nouns of masculine gender in German (Experiment 1) and by gender-unmarked nouns in English (Experiment 2). These statements were followed by a sentence that contained a reference to the subject of the first sentence and expressed either stereotypically feminine, stereotypically masculine, or gender-neutral content. Reading times for the second sentences indicate the ease of reference resolution which depends on the fit between the first sentence’s subject and the gender relatedness of the second sentence. Results show that grammatical gender in German slowed down the reading of information that was mismatched as to gender. No effect occurred in the English study. Results are discussed in terms of the theoretical framework of scenario mapping and focus (Sanford & Garrod, 1981, 1998).

References

  • Braun, F., Gottburgsen, A., Sczesny, S., Stahlberg, D. (1998). Können Geophysiker Frauen sein? Generische Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen [Can geophysicists be women? Generic nouns referring to persons in German]. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 26– 265– 283 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bußmann, H., Hellinger, M. (2003). German. Engendering female visibility in German. In M. Hellinger & H. Bußmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. 3 (pp. 141-174). Amsterdam: Benjamins First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cameron, D. (1985). What has gender got to do with sex?. Language & Communication, 5, 19– 27 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Deaux, K., LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 788-827). New York: McGraw-Hill First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Diekman, A. B., Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171– 1188 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duden Band 4 (1998). Die Grammatik. Mannheim: Dudenverlag First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Duffy, S. A., Keir, J. A. (2004). Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 32, 551– 559 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eckes, T. (1997). Geschlechterstereotype [Gender stereotypes]. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Foertsch, J., Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). In search of gender neutrality. Psychological Science, 8, 106– 111 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gabriel, U., Mellenberger, F. (2004). Exchanging the generic masculine for gender-balanced forms. The impact of context valence. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63, 273– 278 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Garrod, S. C. (1995). Distinguishing between explicit and implicit focus during text comprehension. In G. Rickheit & C. Habel (Eds.), Focus and coherence in discourse processing (pp. 3- 17). Berlin: de Gruyter First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heise, E. (2000). Sind Frauen mitgemeint? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Verständnis des generischen Maskulinums und seiner Alternativen [Are women also meant? An empirical investigation on the understanding of masculine generics and their linguistic alternatives]. Sprache & Kognition, 19, 3– 13 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Hellinger, M., Bußmann, H. (2001). Gender across languages. The linguistic representation of women and men. In M. Hellinger & H. Bußmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. 1 (pp. 1-25). Amsterdam: Benjamins First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffmann, J., Friederici, A. D., Kotz, S. A. (2004). Die Verarbeitung des grammatischen Genus im Deutschen: Einfluss von semantischen, phonologischen und derivations-morphologischen Merkmalen. [Processing grammatical gender in German: The influence of semantic, phonological, and derivational-morphological features]. Paper presented at the 46th Conference for Experimental Psychologists, 2004, Gießen, Germany First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Irmen, L., Köhncke, A. (1996). Zur Psychologie des “generischen” Maskulinums [On the psychology of the “generic” masculine]. Sprache & Kognition, 15, 152– 166 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Irmen, L., Linner, U. (2005). Die Repräsentation generisch maskuliner Personenbezeichnungen: Eine theoretische Integration bisheriger Befunde. [Representing masculine generics: A theoretical integration of empirical findings.]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 213, 127– 132 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Irmen, L., Roßberg, N. (2004). Gender markedness of language: The impact of grammatical and nonlinguistic information on the mental representation of person information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 272– 307 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Köpcke, K.-M., Zubin, D. A. (1984). Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation [Six principles of gender assignment in German: A contribution to natural classification]. Linguistische Berichte, 93, 26– 50 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • MacKay, D. G. (1980). Psychology, prescriptive grammar, and the pronoun problem. American Psychologist, 35, 444– 449 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • MacKay, D. G., Fulkerson, D (1979). On the comprehension and production of pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 661– 673 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Martyna, W. (1980). The psychology of the generic masculine. In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker & N. Furman (Eds.), Women and language in literature and society (pp. 69-78). New York: Praeger First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rothermund, K. (1998). Automatische geschlechtsspezifische Assoziationen beim Lesen von Texten mit geschlechtseindeutigen und generisch maskulinen Text-Subjekten [Automatic sex specific associations during reading of texts with gender-specified and generic masculine text subjects]. Sprache & Kognition, 17, 183– 198 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rothmund, J., Scheele, B. (2004). Personenbezeichnungsmodelle auf dem Prüfstand. [The denotation of persons put to test]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 212, 40– 54 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Sanford, A. J., Garrod, S. C. (1981). Understanding written language. Chichester, UK: Wiley First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sanford, A. J., Garrod, S. C. (1998). The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 26, 159– 190 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stahlberg, D., Sczesny, S. (2001). Effekte des generischen Maskulinums und alternativer Sprachformen auf den gedanklichen Einbezug von Frauen [Effects of generic masculine and alternative forms on the inclusion of women in mental representations]. Psychologische Rundschau, 52, 131– 140 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 542– 562 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • van Gompel, R. P. G., Liversedge, S. P. (2003). The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 128– 139 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar