Effect of Political Orientation on Judgment of Agency, Competence, Morality, and Sociability
The French Presidential Election of 2012
Abstract
Abstract. This study tested the effect of voter’s political orientation on the importance they placed on agency, competence, morality, and sociability as qualities required for being President of the French Republic. It furthermore assessed the participants’ judgments of the five main candidates of the French Presidential Election of 2012 on those dimensions. The results showed that, compared to left-wing voters, right-wing voters placed greater importance on agency and less importance on morality and sociability as qualities required for being president. Right-wing voters differentiated between candidates with respect to agency more than competence, whereas the reverse pattern was observed for left-wing voters. Voters differentiated between candidates with respect to morality as much as sociability. Finally, the participants’ ratings of candidates showed a partisan effect: Left-wing voters rated left-wing candidates as being more competent, moral, and sociable, the same being true of right-wing candidates by right-wing voters. Ratings of candidates’ agentic qualities were less dependent on the voter’s political orientation. These data provide support for how people perceived qualities necessary for being President in France.
References
2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063–1065. doi 10.1002/ejsp.574
(2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
(2009). Lay psychology and the social value of persons. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 1082–1095. doi 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00225.x
(2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39. doi 10.1177/0002716212451428
(2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135–143. doi 10.1002/ejsp.744
(1999). Personality profiles and political parties. Political Psychology, 20, 175– 197. doi 10.1111/0162-895X.00141
(2002). When parsimony subdues distinctiveness: Simplified public perception of politicians’ personality. Political Psychology, 23, 77–96. doi 10.1111/0162-895X.00271
(2008). The personalization of politics: Lessons from the Italian case. European Psychologist, 3, 157–172. doi 10.1027/1016-9040.13.3.157
(2007). When likeness goes with liking: The case of political preference. Political Psychology, 28, 609–632. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9921. 2007.00592.x
(2009). The mediational role of values in linking personality traits to political orientation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 82–94. doi 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2009.01274.x
(2014). The primacy of agency over competence in status perception. Social Psychology, 45, 347–356. doi 10.1027/1864-9335/a000176
(2006). The role of self-interest and competence in attitudes toward politicians. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 37, 203–212. doi 10.1002/ejsp.554
(2010). Theory of the social value of persons applied to organizations: Typologies of good leaders and recruitment. European Review of Applied Psychology, 60, 255–266. doi 10.1016/ j.erap.2010.01.002
(2005). Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–146. doi 10.1002/ejsp.236
(2011). Are some rabbits more competent and warm than others? The lay epistemologist is interested in object value, not in descriptive parameters. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 70, 63–73. doi 10.1024/1421-0185/a000040
(2012).
(The social value of persons: Theory and applications . In G. RossiEd., Psychology – selected papers (pp. 307–330). Rijeka, Croatia: InTech Europe.2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi 10.1037/ 0022-3514.82.6.878
(2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
(1985).
(Public opinion and political action . In G. LindzeyE. AronsonEds., Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 659–741). New York: Random House.2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
(2012). LimeSurvey: An Open Source survey tool [Internet Software]. Hamburg, Germany: LimeSurvey Project. Retrieved from http://www.limesurvey.org
(2006). Perspectives de la théorie des cinq facteurs (TCF): traits et culture [
(A five-factor theory perspective on traits and culture ]. Psychologie Française, 51, 227– 244. doi 10.1016/j.psfr.2005.09.0012002). Applying the affordance conception of traits: A person perception study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 1327–1334. doi 10.1177/014616702236825
(2012). Perceiving the target’s state or state provoked by the target? An analysis of the descriptive and evaluative knowledge in person perception. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 583–605. doi 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02025.x
(2007). System justifying ideologies moderate status = competence stereotypes: Roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1135–1148. doi 10.1002/ejsp.428
(2010). Social status and the pursuit of positive social identity: Systematic domains of intergroup differentiation and discrimination for high- and low-status groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 425–444. doi 10.1177/1368430209355650
(2010). Fooled by first impressions? Re-examining the diagnostic value of appearance-based inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 315–324. doi 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.002
(1978). Choices and echoes in presidential elections: Rational man and electoral democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(1992). Evaluative meanings of adjectives in vitro and in context: Some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive-negative asymmetry and behavioral-adaptive concepts of evaluation. Psychologica Belgica, 32, 211–231.
(1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 33–60. doi 10.1080/14792779108401856
(2009). Faces of politicians: Babyfacedness predicts inferred competence but not electoral success. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1132–1135. doi 0.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.007
(2009). The ideal politician: Impact of voters’ ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 60–65. doi 10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.006
(1992).
(Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries . In M. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31, 421–452. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00764.x
(2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476–490. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476
(2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson International Edition.
(2002). Social identification among political party voters and members: An empirical test of optimal distinctiveness theory. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 202–209. doi 10.1080/00224540209603895
(2011). Higher-order factors of the Big Five and basic values: Empirical and theoretical relations. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 478–498. doi 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02006.x
(2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1024–1037. doi 10.1037//0022-3514.78.6.1024
(1996).
(A dyadic-interactional perspective on the five-factor model . In J. S. WigginsEd., The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 88–162). New York: Guilford.2011). Self-esteem is dominated by agentic over communal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 617–627. doi 10.1002/ejsp.791
(1996). Moral and competence-related traits in political perception. Political Psychology Bulletin, 27, 319–324.
(