Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Short Research Note

Do Ambiguous Normative Ingroup Members Increase Tolerance for Deviants?

Published Online:January 19, 2016https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000170

Abstract

Abstract. Subjective group dynamics theory (Marques, Páez, & Abrams, 1998) proposes that deviant ingroup members who threaten the positive value of the group members’ social identity are evaluated negatively. In an experiment, we investigated whether group members evaluate deviant ingroup members less negatively when the normative member’s commitment to the ingroup is ambiguous. Participants evaluated one normative and one deviant ingroup or outgroup member. Two conditions were contrasted, in which the normative target showed high versus low commitment to the group. As predicted, the participants evaluated deviant ingroup targets more negatively and normative ingroup targets more positively than their respective outgroup counterparts – but only when the normative member’s commitment to the ingroup was unambiguous. When presented with a normative member with ambiguous commitment, the deviant ingroup member was evaluated less negatively. We discuss these results in light of subjective group dynamics theory.

References

  • Abrams, D., Randsley de Moura, G., Marques, J. M., & Hutchison, P. (2008). Innovation credit: When can leaders oppose their group’s norms? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 662–678. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.662 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Abrams, D., Randsley de Moura, G., & Travaglino, G. (2013). A double standard when group members behave badly: Transgression credit to ingroup leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 799–815. doi10.1037/a0033600 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frings, D., Abrams, D., Randsley de Moura, G., & Marques, J. M. (2010). The effects of cost, normative support, and issue importance on motivation to persuade in-group deviants. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14, 80–91. doi 10.1037/a0016092 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marques, J. M. (2004). Déviance, normativité, et dynamique de groupes subjective [Deviance, normativeness, and subjective group dynamics]. New Review of Social Psychology, Festschrift in Honor of Willem Doise, 1–2, 29–37. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Páez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and ingroup norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976–988. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.976 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., & Serôdio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436–447. doi 10.1037//0022-3514.81.3.436 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marques, J. M., & Páez, D. (1994). The “black sheep effect”: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 37–68. doi 10.1080/14792779543000011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marques, J. M., & Páez, D. (2008). Dynamique de groupes subjective: Un cadre théorique pour l’effet brebis galeuse [Subjective group dynamics: A theoretical framework for the black sheep effect]. In R. V. JouleP. HuguetEds., Bilans et perspectives en psychologie sociale (Vol. 2, pp. 71–115). Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marques, J. M., Páez, D., & Abrams, D. (1998). Social identity and intragroup differentiation as subjective social control. In S. WorchelJ. F. MoralesD. PáezJ.-C. DeschampsEds., Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 124–141). London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J.-P. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity toward ingroup members as a function of ingroup identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1–16. doi 10.1002/ejsp.2420180102 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muller, D., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Judd, C. M. (2008). Adjusting for a mediator in models with two crossed treatment variables. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 224–240. doi 10.1177/1094428106296639 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Packer, D. J. (2008). On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 50–72. doi 10.1177/1088868307309606 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pinto, I. R., Marques, J. M., Levine, J. M., & Abrams, D. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 107–119. doi 10.1037/a0018187 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Randsley de Moura, G., & Abrams, D. (2013). Bribery, blackmail, and the double standard for leader transgressions. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 17(1), 43–52. doi 10.1037/ a0031287 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar