Skip to main content
Short Research Note

The Impact of Regulatory Focus on Challenge and Threat

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000175

Abstract. Research has shown that feelings of threat elicit a prevention focus and feelings of challenge elicit a promotion focus. The present research tested the reverse causal relationship. We predicted that, when people are faced with a demanding task, they experience more challenge and less threat if they are in a promotion focus as compared to a prevention focus because having a promotion focus results in the perception of having more resources than a prevention focus does. In two studies assessing or manipulating regulatory focus, respectively, we found the expected effect on challenge and threat as well as the mediation of this effect via perceived resources. The relationships between regulatory focus and challenge and threat are discussed.

References

  • Amthauer, R., Brocke, B., Liepmann, D., & Beauducel, A. (2001). I-S-T 2000 R. Intelligence Structure Test 2000 R (Expanded and revised ed., Vol. 2). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 794–809. doi 10.1037/a0022981 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blascovich, J., Seery, M. D., Mugridge, C. A., Norris, R. K., & Weisbuch, M. (2004). Predicting athletic performance from cardiovascular indexes of challenge and threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 683–688. doi 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1996). The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. In M. P. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 1–51). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001–1013. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grimm, L. R., Markman, A. B., Maddox, W. T., & Baldwin, G. C. (2009). Stereotype threat reinterpreted as a regulatory mismatch. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 288–304. doi 10.1037/a0013463 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300. doi 10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keller, J. (2007). When negative stereotypic expectancies turn into challenge or threat: The moderating role of regulatory focus. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66, 163–168. doi 10.1024/1421-0185.66.3.163 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Keller, J. (2012). Differential gender and ethnic differences in math performance: A self-regulatory perspective. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 220, 164–171. doi 10.1027/2151-2604/a000109 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2008). Expectancy effects on cognitive test performance: Regulatory focus as a catalyst. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 187–212. doi 10.1002/ejsp.452 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P., Higgins, E. T., Atash, M. N., Pierro, A., Shah, J. Y., & Spiegel, S. (2000). To do the right thing or to just do it: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793–815. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.793 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Liberman, N., Molden, D. C., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 5–18. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oyserman, D., Uskul, A. K., Yoder, N., Nesse, R., & Williams, D. (2007). Unfair treatment and self-regulatory focus. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 505–512. doi 10.1016/ j.jesp.2006.05.014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peacock, E. J., & Wong, P. T. P. (1990). The stress appraisal measure (SAM): A multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal. Stress Medicine, 6, 227–236. doi 10.1002/smi.2460060308 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731. doi 10.3758/BF03206553 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sassenberg, K., Ellemers, N., & Scheepers, D. (2012). The attraction of social power: The influence of construing power as opportunity versus responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 550–555. doi 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sassenberg, K., Sassenrath, C., & Fetterman, A. K. (2015). Threat – prevention, challenge – promotion: The impact of threat, challenge and regulatory focus on attention to negative stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 188–195. doi 10.1080/02699931.2014.898612 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scholl, A., Sassenrath, C., & Sassenberg, K. (2015). Attracted to power: Challenge/threat and promotion/prevention focus differentially predict the attractiveness of group power. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–9. doi 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seibt, B., & Förster, J. (2004). Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 38–56. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.38 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance of women and African-Americans. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629. doi 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kelsey, R. M., & Leitten, C. L. (1993). Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 248–260. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.248 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kibler, J., & Ernst, J. (1997). Cognitive and physiological antecedents of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 63–72. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.63 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar