Screeningfragebögen zu Risiko- und Schutzfaktoren für Traumafolgestörungen – Ein systematischer Review
Abstract
Eine Herausforderung im Rahmen der frühen Versorgung nach traumatischen Ereignissen liegt in der Identifizierung derjenigen Betroffenen, die ohne professionelle Unterstützung psychische Störungen entwickeln und bei denen somit psychologische Frühinterventionen indiziert sind. Aufgrund geringer Prädiktivität bzw. Sensitivität ist die Diagnose einer akuten Belastungsstörung zur Vorhersage von Traumafolgestörungen nicht gut geeignet. Die Berücksichtigung von Risiko- und Schutzfaktoren verbessert die Vorhersage signifikant. Anhand eines systematischen Reviews gibt diese Arbeit einen Überblick über sieben Screeningfragebögen zu Risiko- und Schutzfaktoren für Traumafolgestörungen. Sowohl für Erwachsene als auch für Kinder liegen Instrumente vor, die eine deutlich höhere Sensitivität aufweisen als die akute Belastungsstörung und die somit für mehrstufige Screeningprogramme besser geeignet sind. Die Posttraumatic Adjustment Scale weist die besten Kennwerte auf und ist das einzige Instrument, das kreuzvalidiert ist und sich im Rahmen eines Screen-and-treat-Programms als praktikabel und effektiv erwiesen hat. In deutscher Sprache ist allerdings kein solches Instrument verfügbar.
Traumatic events pose special challenges. One is the identification of individuals that are likely to develop mental disorders and for whom early psychological intervention is indicated. The acute stress disorder diagnosis is not well-suited for the prediction of posttraumatic mental disorders because of its poor sensitivity. Accounting for risk and protective factors significantly improves the predictive power. Based on a systematic review this paper discusses seven screening questionnaires that aim at risk and protective factors following traumatic events. There are screening questionnaires for risk and protective factors that show reasonable sensitivity, compared to the acute stress disorder diagnosis, and which therefore are better suited for multi-stepped screening programs. The Posttraumatic Adjustment Scale performs best and is the only instrument that was cross-validated and proved to be feasible and effective within a screen-and-treat-program. However, none of these instruments is available in German.
Literatur
Referenzen, die mit einem *Stern markiert sind, zeigen Studien an, die Ergebnis der systematischen Literaturrecherche waren.
(2007). Australian guidelines for the treatment of adults with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Melbourne: ACPMH.
(2012). Schutz- und Risikofaktoren für Traumafolgestörungen: Ein systematischer Review. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 41, 148–165.
(2011). The child and family traumatic stress intervention: secondary prevention for youth at risk of developing PTSD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 676–685.
(2010). TENTS guidelines: development of post-disaster psychosocial care guidelines through a delphi process. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 196, 69–74.
(2010). Implementing a screening programme for post-traumatic stress disorder following violent crime. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 1, 5541– 5541.
(1995). The development of a clinician-administered PTSD scale. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8, 75–90.
(2005). Systematic review of screening instruments for adults at risk of PTSD. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18, 53–62.
(2000). Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 748–766.
(2010). Outreach and screening following the 2005 London bombings: usage and outcomes. Psychological Medicine, 40, 2049–2057.
(2010). Diagnostic accuracy of the trauma screening questionnaire after the 2005 London bombings. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23, 393–398.
(2002). A brief screening instrument for posttraumatic stress disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 158–162.
(2011). Acute Stress Disorder as a Predictor of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 72, 233–239.
(2012). The capacity of acute stress disorder to predict posttraumatic psychiatric disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 46, 168–173.
(2011). A review of acute stress disorder in DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety, 28, 802–817.
(1973). SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale – preliminary report. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9, 13–28.
(2008). Do cognitive models help in predicting the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder, phobia, and depression after motor vehicle accidents? A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 219–230.
(2005). Sensitivität, Spezifität, positiver und negativer Vorhersagewert. Die Rehabilitation, 44, 44–49.
(1996). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
(Hrsg.).(2011). S2-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Behandlung von akuten Folgen psychischer Traumatisierung. Trauma und Gewalt, 5, 214–221.
(1996). Childhood posttraumatic stress disorder. In E. J. Mash & R. Barkley (Hrsg.), Child psychopathology (S. 242–276). New York: Guilford Press.
(1993). Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6, 459–473.
(1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 23, 56–61.
(2006). Prevalence of exposure to potentially traumatic events and PTSD. The Zurich Cohort Study. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 256, 151–158.
(1979). Impact of event scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.
(2007). Multidisciplinary guideline. Early psychosocial interventions after disasters, terrorism and other shocking events. Verfügbar unter: www.impact-kenniscentrum.nl/doc/file_1221124881.pdf [17.9.2012].
(1997). Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 980–988.
(1992). The Child's Depression Inventory. Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
(2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613.
*(2007). Psychiatric disorders among adults seeking emergency disaster assistance after a wildland-urban interface fire. Psychiatric Services, 58, 509–514.
(2009). Development and validation of the Child Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory (CPTCI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 432–440.
(1998). Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Children and Adolescents (CAPS-CA). Boston: National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
(2005). Post-traumatic stress disorder – the management of PTSD in adults and children in primary and secondary care. National Clinical Practice Guideline Number 26. London: Gaskell and the British Psychological Society.
*(2010). Screening and predicting posttraumatic stress and depression in children following single-incident trauma. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39, 588–596.
(2007). The epidemiology of trauma and PTSD. In M. J. Friedman, T. M. Keane & P. A. Resick (Hrsg.), Handbook of PTSD: Science and practice (S. 78–98). New York, NY US.
*(2008). A predictive screening index for posttraumatic stress disorder and depression following traumatic injury. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 923–932.
(2004). Psychiatric morbidity following injury. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 507–514.
(2012). Stepped early psychological intervention for posttraumatic stress disorder, other anxiety disorders, and depression following serious injury. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 25, 125–133.
et al.(2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 52–73.
(2000). Traumatic events and post-traumatic stress disorder in the community: Prevalence, risk factors and comorbidity. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 101, 46–59.
*(2011). Predicting the future development of depression or PTSD after injury. General Hospital Psychiatry, 33, 327–335.
(2009). Multiple session early psychological interventions for the prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3 .
(2010). Early psychological interventions to treat acute traumatic stress symptoms (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3 .
(1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59, 22–33.
(2012). A meta-analysis of risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 122–138.
(2012). Criteria for appraising the viability, effectiveness and appropriateness of a screening programme. Verfügbar unter: www.screening.nhs.uk/criteria [15.5.2012].
(1993, Oct). The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Conference of the ISTSS. San Antonio, TX.
*(2004). Police referral to victim support: the predictive and diagnostic value of the RISK (10) Screening Instrument. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 25, 118–127.
(2003). Screening for risk of persistent posttraumatic stress in injured children and their parents. JAMA, 290, 643–649.
*(2002). Identifying crime victims who are at high risk for post traumatic stress disorder: developing a practical referral instrument. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 105, 451–460.
(2004). A randomized effectiveness trial of stepped collaborative care for acutely injured trauma survivors. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 498–506.