Skip to main content
Studie

Defizite in den Exekutivfunktionen von Kindern mit ADHS

Zur klinischen Validität des ADHS-Diagnostikums für Kinder und Jugendliche (ADHS-KJ)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0942-5403/a000279

Zusammenfassung. Das Erhebungsverfahren ADHS-KJ beinhaltet eine differenzierte neuropsychologische Erfassung der exekutiven Funktionen sowie eine standardisierte Verhaltensbeobachtung des hyperaktiven Verhaltens von Kindern und Jugendlichen im Alter von 6;0 bis 12;11 Jahren. Die Aussagekraft des neuropsychologischen Moduls des ADHS-KJ wurde anhand einer Gruppe von Kindern mit einer ADHS-Diagnose (n = 58) und einer parallelisierten Kontrollgruppe untersucht (n = 58); es wurde überprüft, inwieweit das Alter und die medikamentöse Behandlung der Kinder die Ergebnisse beeinflussten. Zusätzlich wurden die neuropsychologischen Ergebnisse mit Befunden einer standardisierten Verhaltensbeobachtung in Zusammenhang gesetzt. Es wurde belegt, dass das Erhebungsverfahren ADHS-KJ zwischen Kindern mit und ohne eine ADHS auf der Basis der Komponenten der exekutiven Funktionen und des darauf bezogenen Gesamttestwertes des ADHS-KJ sowie der Beobachtung des hyperkinetischen Verhaltens differenzieren konnte. Die Unterschiede zwischen der ADHS- und Kontrollgruppe wurden durch kleine (d = .36) bis große (d = .95) Effektstärken gekennzeichnet. Das Erhebungsverfahren ADHS-KJ differenzierte deutlich zwischen jüngeren und älteren Kindern mit ADHS ( ≥ 1.00). Das Erhebungsverfahren ADHS-KJ kann als multimodales und multimethodales Vorgehen für die Diagnostik einer ADHS empfohlen werden, wobei die Auffälligkeiten in den Exekutivfunktionen besonders kennzeichnend für Kinder der Altersgruppe von sechs bis acht Jahren sind.


Deficits in Executive Functions of Children With ADHD: Clinical Validity of a Diagnostic Instrument for ADHD in Children and Adolescents (ADHS-KJ)

Abstract. The diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) poses a challenge to therapists because ADHD has been declared a behavioral disorder for a long time. Therefore, the diagnosis is based on observable behavior, which is subject to various deviations. According to the current understanding of the disorder, the self-regulation of children with ADHD is disturbed, which is associated with deficits in executive functions. The aim of this study was to validate a diagnostic instrument for ADHD (ADHS-KJ; Petermann & Petermann, 2019) and to check whether the neuropsychological test and the Behavioural Observation Scale of Hyperactivity differ between children with ADHD (n = 58) and a parallel control group (n = 58). In addition, we controlled for age effects comparing the scores of children in the neuropsychological test and the Behavioral Observation Scale in two age groups (n = 14: 6.0 – 7.99 and n = 13: 10.0 – 12.99). The influence of psychopharmacological medication on these scores was also examined by comparing children with ADHD who received some medication (n = 31), children with ADHD without medication (n = 27), and children without ADHD (n = 31). Multivariate variance analyses were performed to investigate group differences using effect sizes (Cohen’s d) to evaluate the magnitude of differences in the executive functions between the clinical and the control group. The results of the present study showed significant differences between children with and without clinical ADHD in the area of Flexible Attention Control Deficits: Divided Attention (Subtest 1; d = .40), Deficits in Action Planning to Achieve a Goal Without Errors (Subtest 2; d = .57), Deficits in Inhibition of External Stimuli for Attention Control (Subtest 3; d = .36), Deficits in Inhibition of Internal Impulses to the Reaction Stop (Subtest 4; d = .39), overall Deficits of the Executive Functions (DEF; d = .63), and the Behavioural Observation Scale of Hyperactivity (VBH; d = .95). These effect sizes are to be interpreted as small to large. Age differences were detected in all subtests, with the exception of the subtest Deficits in Inhibition of Internal Impulses for Reaction Stop. Differences were also found in the overall score of Deficits of the Executive Functions (DEF) and the Behavioral Observation Scale of Hyperactivity (VBH) with large effect sizes (d ≥ 1.00). Influences related to medications of children with an ADHD diagnosis were only found to be significant in the subtest Deficits in Inhibition of External Stimuli for Attention Control (d =.70). The study was able to detect significant differences of the ADHD group in comparison with the control group as well as difference in the age group comparison. These findings support the hypothesis that the diagnostic instrument ADHS-KJ is suitable for use in diagnostics of children without medication. The multimodal and multimethod diagnostic instrument ADHS-KJ is recommended in the diagnostics of ADHD in order to support the observable behavior of the affected child with psychometrically secured data and to identify the exact source of possible impairments or deviations. The information provided by the ADHS-KJ makes a significant contribution to diagnostic clarification and individual therapy planning.

Literatur

  • Abikoff, H., Courtney, M., Pelham, W. E. & Koplewicz, H. S. (1993). Teachers’ ratings of disruptive behaviors: The influence of halo effects. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 21, 519 – 533. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • American Psychatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • AWMF. (2017). Leitlinienreport der interdisziplinären evidenz- und konsensbasierten (S3) Leitlinie „Aufmderksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung (ADHS) im Kindes-, Jugend- und Erwachsenenalter“. Verfügbar unter https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/028-045l_S3_ADHS_2018-06.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bikic, A., Leckman, J. F., Lindschou, J., Christiansen, T. Ø. & Dalsgaard, S. (2015). Cognitive computer training in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) versus no intervention: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 16, 480 – 493. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bied, A., Biederman, J. & Faraone, S. (2018). Parent-based diagnosis of ADHD is a accurate as a teacher-based diagnosis of ADHD. Postgraduate Medicine, 129, 375 – 381. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Biederman, J. M. D., Petty, C. R., Doyle, A. E., Spencer, T., Henderson, C. S., Marion, B. et al. (2008). Stability of executive function deficits in girls with ADHD: A prospective longitudinal followup study into adolescence. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 44 – 61. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bloemen, A. J. P., Oldehinkel, A. J., Laceulle, O. M., Ormel, J., Rommelse, N. N. J. & Hartman, C. A. (2018). The association between executive functioning and psychopathology: General or specific? Psychological Medicine, 48, 1787 – 1794. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, T. E. (2018). ADHS bei Kindern und Erwachsenen – eine neue Sichtweise. Bern: Hogrefe. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bruchmüller, K, Margraf, J. & Schneider, S. (2012). Is ADHD diagnosed in accord with diagnostic criteria? Overdiagnosis and influence of client gender on diagnosis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 128 – 138. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Desman, C. & Petermann, F. (2005). Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung (ADHS): Wie valide sind Subtypen? Kindheit und Entwicklung, 14, 244 – 254. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Dovis, S., Oord, S. van der, Wiers, R. W. & Prins, P. J. M. (2015). Improving executive functioning in children with ADHD: Training multiple executive functions within the context of a computer game. A randomized double-blind placebo controlled trail. PLoS One, 10, 1 – 30. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Geurts, H. M., Verté, S., Oosterlaan, J., Roeyers, H. & Sergeant, J. A. (2004). How specific are executive functioning deficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 836 – 854. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Geurts, H. M., Verté, S., Oosterlaan, J., Roeyers, H. & Sergeant, J. A. (2005). ADHD subtypes: Do they differ in their executive functioning profile? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 457 – 477. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hampel, P., Petermann, F. & Desman, C. (2009). Exekutive Funktionen bei Jungen mit Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung im Kindesalter. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 18, 144 – 152. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Hennig, T., Schramm, S. A. & Linderkamp, F. (2018). Cross-informant disagreement on behavioral symptoms in adolescent Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and its impact on treatment effects. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34, 79 – 86. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Holmes, J., Gathercole, S. E., Place, M., Alloway, T. P., Elliott, J. G. & Hilton, K. A. (2010). The diagnostic utility of executive function assessments in the identification of ADHD in children. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 15, 37 – 43. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hult, N., Kadesjö, J., Kadesjö, B., Gillberg, C. & Billstedt, E. (2018). ADHD and the QbTest: Diagnostic validity of QbTest. Journal of Attention Disorders, 22, 1074 – 1080. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, D. A. & King, A. R. (2004). Gender differences in the effects of oppositional behavior on teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 215 – 224. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobs, C. & Petermann, F. (2007). Aufmerksamkeitstörungen bei Kindern. Langzeiteffekte des neuropsychologischen Gruppenprogrammes ATTENTIONER. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 16, 40 – 49. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobs, C. & Petermann, F. (2013). Training für Kinder mit Aufmerksamkeitsstörungen. Das neuropsychologische Gruppenprogramm ATTENTIONER (3., veränd. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jaščenoka, J., Schwörer, M. C., Petermann, F., Vasileva, M. & Petermann, U. (2019). Zum Zusammenhang von Arbeitsgedächtnisleistungen und ausgewählten Exekutivfunktionen bei Kindern mit ADHS. Ein Beitrag zur Kriteriumsvalidität des ADHS-KJ. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 28, 114 – 122. First citation in articleAbstractGoogle Scholar

  • Johnstone, S. J., Roodenrys, S., Blackman, R., Johnston, E., Loveday, K., Mantz, S. & Barett, M. F. (2012). Neurocognitive training for children with and without AD/HD. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, 4, 11 – 23. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kofler, M. J., Irwin, L. N., Soto, E. F., Groves, N. B., Harmon, S. L. & Sarver, D. E. (2018). Executive function heterogeneity in pediatric ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-018-0438-2 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kray, J., Karbach, J., Haenig, S. & Freitag, C. (2012). Can task-switching training enhance executive control functioning in children with attention deficit/-hyperactivity disorder? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1 – 9. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mayfield, A. R., Parke, E. M., Barchard, K. A., Zenisek, R. P., Thaler, N. S., Etcoff, L. M. & Allen, D. N. (2018). Equivalence of mother and father ratings of ADHD in children. Child Neuropsychology, 24, 166 – 183. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Minder, F., Zuberer, A., Brandeis, D. & Drechsler, R. (2018). A review of the clinical utility of systematic behavioral observations in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 49, 572 – 606. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H. & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe“ tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49 – 100. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Øie, M., Hovik, K. T., Andersen, P. N., Czajkowski, N. O. & Skogli, E. W. (2018). Gender differences in the relationship between changes in ADHD symptoms, executive functions, and self- and parent-report depression symptoms in boys and girls with ADHD: A 2-year follow-up study. Journal of Attention Disorders, 22, 446 – 459. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pauls, F., Daseking, M., Jacobs, C., Werpup, L. & Petermann, F. (2018). Intelligenzdiagnostik bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit ADHS. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 27, 165 – 174. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Petermann, U. & Petermann, F. (2019). ADHS-Diagnostikum für Kinder und Jugendliche (ADHS-KJ). Bern: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Petermann, F. & Toussaint, A. (2009). Neuropsychologische Diagnostik bei Kindern mit ADHS. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 18, 83 – 94. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Re, A. M., Capodieci, A. & Cornoldi, C. (2015). Effect of training focused on executive functions (attention, inhibition, and working memory) in preschoolers exhibiting ADHD symptoms. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1 – 9. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reinelt, T. & Petermann, F. (2018). Zur Bedeutung auffälliger Exekutivfunktionen in der Diagnostik einer Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 66, 207 – 217. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, S., Brücher, K. & Petermann, F. (2006). Komorbidität der Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung (ADHS) im Erwachsenenalter: Perspektiven für die Diagnostik mit dem Screeningverfahren BAS-E. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 54, 123 – 132. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Thorell, L. B., Lindqvist, S., Nutley, S. B., Bohlin, G. & Klingberg, T. (2009). Training and transfer effects of executive functions in preschool children. Developmental Science, 12, 106 – 113. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vogt, C. & Shameli, A. (2011). Assessments for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Use of objective measurements. The Psychiatrist, 35, 380 – 383. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wåhlstedt, C., Thorell, L. B. & Bohlin, G. (2009). Heterogeneity in ADHD: Neuropsychological pathways, comorbidity and symptoms domains. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 551 – 561. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wehmeier, P. M., Schacht, A., Wolff, C., Otto, W. R., Dittmann, R. W. & Banaschewski, T. (2011). Neuropsychological outcomes across the day in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treated with Atomoxetine: Results from a placebo-controlled study using a computer-based continous performance test combined with an infra-red motion-tracking device. Journal of Child an Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 21, 433 – 444. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • World Health Organization (2009). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (ICD-10). Genf: WHO. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • World Health Organization (2018). ICD-11 for mortality and morbidity statistics. Retrieved from https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Willcutt, E. G., Doyle, A. E., Nigg, J. T., Faraone, S. V. & Pennington, B. F. (2005). Validity of the executive function theory of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1336 – 1346. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yang, L., Cao, Q., Shuai, L., Li, H., Chan, R. C. K. & Wang, Y. (2012). Comparative study of OROS-MPH and atomoxetine on executive function improvement in ADHD: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 15, 15 – 26. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar