Skip to main content
Originalia

Psychosoziale Arbeitsbedingungen und Rückenschmerz

Der moderierende Effekt von Detachment in der Freizeit

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149/a000121

Psychosoziale Arbeitsbedingungen, wie Arbeitsstressoren und –ressourcen, stehen im engen Zusammenhang mit der Entstehung von Rückenschmerzen. Die Wahrnehmung und der Umgang mit den Arbeitsbedingungen hängen jedoch stark von dem eigenen Erholungszustand und besonders von der Fähigkeit ab, sich in der Freizeit von belastenden Arbeitsbedingungen zu distanzieren (Detachment). Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es, den Einfluss von Detachment auf den Zusammenhang von psychosozialen Arbeitsbedingungen und Rückenschmerz genauer zu untersuchen. Zu diesem Zweck wurde eine Onlinebefragung bei insgesamt 647 Verwaltungsangestellten von 13 Hochschulen in NRW durchgeführt. Die Befragten wurden in zwei Gruppen, eine mit Rückenbeschwerden und eine ohne Rückenbeschwerden, unterteilt. Personen mit Rückenschmerzen zeigten deutlich ungünstigere Arbeitsbedingungen auf und hatten niedrigere Detachment-Werte. Zudem konnte mittels logistischer Regressionsanalyse der moderierende Einfluss von Detachment auf den Zusammenhang von Arbeitsstressoren mit Rückenschmerzen bestätigt werden. Auch der Zusammenhang zwischen dem Organisationsklima und Rückenschmerzen wurde durch Detachment moderiert. Der Einfluss des Detachments war dabei besonders ausgeprägt, wenn die Arbeitnehmer/innen starken Belastungen durch Arbeitsstressoren und einem unterstützenden Organisationsklima ausgesetzt waren.


Psychosocial work condition and back pain: The moderating effect of detachment in leisure time

Psychosocial work demands and resources are identified risk factors for back pain development. But, coping with these work factors strongly depends on individual recovery status and the ability to detach from work demands. This study aimed to explore effects of detachment on the connection of work conditions and back pain. From 13 German universities, 647 administrations employees participated in an online-assessment. Questions regarding sociodemographic facts, back pain issues, work demands and resources, and detachment were included in this questionnaire. Respondents were divided into two groups to separate those with back pain and those without back pain. Persons with back pain showed stronger unfavorable work conditions and lower detachment scores. Furthermore, the moderating effect of detachment could be identified by logistic regression analysis. Detachment moderated the relations between work stress and back pain. Additionally, a moderating influence of detachment on the relationship between work climate and back pain was identified. It can be concluded that detachment in leisure time is related to back pain development. Especially when work stress is high it is important for people to detach adequately after work to avoid back pain issues.

Literatur

  • Bakker, A. B. & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309 – 328. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Binnewies, C. , Sonnentag, S. & Mojza, E. J. (2008). Daily performance at work: Feeling recovered in the morning as a predictor of day-level job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 67 – 93. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Binnewies, C. , Sonnentag, S. & Mojza, E. J. (2010). Recovery during the weekend and fluctuations in weekly job performance: A week-level study examining intra-individual relationships. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 419 – 441. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BKK Bundesverband (2008). BKK Faktenspiegel: Schwerpunktthema Rückengesundheit. Zugriff am 02. 08. 2013. Verfügbar unter http://www.bkk.de/fileadmin/user_upload/PDF/Faktenspiegel/Archiv/Nov08_20.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Clays, E. , Bacquer, D. de , Leynen, F. , Kornitzer, M. , Kittel, F. & de Backer, G. (2007). The impact of psychosocial factors on low back pain: Longitudinal results from the Belstress study. Spine, 32, 262 – 268. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, K. G. , Marras, W. S. , Heaney, C. A. , Waters, T. R. & Gupta, P. (2002). The impact of mental processing and pacing on spine loading. Spine, 27, 2645 – 2653. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eriksen, H. R. , Ihlebaek, C. , Jansen, J. P. & Burdorf, A. (2006). The relations between psychosocial factors at work and health status among workers in home care organizations. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 13, 183 – 192. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fernandes, R. C. P. , Carvalho, F. M. , Assuncao, A. A. & Neto, S. A. M. (2009). Interactions between physical and psychosocial demands of work associated to low back pain. Revista de Saude Publica, 43, 326 – 334. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fritz, C. , Sonnentag, S. , Spector, P. E. & McInroe, J. A. (2010). The weekend matters: Relationships between stress recovery and affective experiences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1137 – 1162. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Geurts, S. A. E. & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32, 482 – 492. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hauke, A. , Flintrop, J. , Brun, E. & Rugulies, R. (2011). The impact of work-related psychosocial stressors on the onset of musculoskeletal disorders in specific body regions: A review and meta-analysis of 54 longitudinal studies. Work & Stress, 25, 243 – 256. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heneweer, H. , Staes, F. , Aufdemkampe, G. , van Rijn, M. & Vanhees, L. (2011). Physical activity and low back pain: A systematic review of recent literature. European Spine Journal, 20, 826 – 845. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, F. , Burke, R. & Westman, M. (Eds.). (2005). Work–life balance: A psychological perspective. Hove, UK: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kallus, W. K. (1995). Der Erholungs-Belastungs-Fragebogen. Frankfurt: Swets & Zeitlinger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kallus, W. K. (2002). Impact of recovery in different areas of application. In M. Kellmann, (Ed.), Enhancing recovery: Preventing underperformance in athletes (pp. 283 – 300). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Karahan, A. , Kav, S. , Abbasoglu, A. & Dogan, N. (2009). Low back pain: Prevalence and associated risk factors among hospital staff. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65, 516 – 524. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kellmann, M. & Kallus, W. K. (2000). Der Erholungs-Belastungsfragebogen für Sportler. Frankfurt: Swets & Zeitlinger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Klasen, B. W. , Hallner, D. , Schaub, C. , Willburger, R. & Hasenbring, M. (2004). Validation and reliability of the German version of the Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire in primary care back pain patients. Psycho-Social-Medicine, 1, 1 – 12. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang J., Ochsmann E. , Kraus T. & Lang J. W., (2012). Psychosocial work stressors as antecedents of musculoskeletal problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of stability-adjusted longitudinal studies. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 1163 – 1174. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marras, W. S. , Davis, K. G. , Heaney, C. A. , Maronitis, A. B. & Allread, W. G. (2000). The influence of psychosocial stress, gender, and personality on mechanical loading of the lumbar spine. Spine, 25, 3045 – 3054. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meijman, T. F. & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. D. Drenth, H. Thierry & C. J. de Wolff, (Eds.), Work Psychology. Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 5 – 33). Hove: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mitchell, T. , O’Sullivan, P. , Burnett, A. , Straker, L. , Smith, A. , Thornton, J. et al. (2010). Identification of modifiable personal factors that predict new-onset low back pain: A prospective study of female nursing students. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 26, 275 – 283. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prümper, J. , Hartmannsgruber, K. & Frese, M. (1995). KFZA. Kurz-Fragebogen zur Arbeitsanalyse. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 39, 125 – 132. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ragsdale, J. M. , Beehr, T. A. , Grebner, S. & Han, K. (2011). An integrated model of weekday stress and weekend recovery of students. International Journal of Stress Management, 18, 153 – 180. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raspe, H. (2012). Rückenschmerz. In Robert Koch Institut (Hrsg.), Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes, Berlin. Zugriff am 03. 08. 2013. Verfügbar unter http://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Gesundheitsmonitoring/Gesundheitsberichterstattung/GBEDownloadsT/rueckenschmerzen. pdf? __blob=publicationFile First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sauter, S. L. & Swanson, N. F. (1996). An ecological model of musculoskeletal disorders in work. In S. D. Moon & S. L. Sauter, (Eds.), Beyond biomechanics. Psychosocial aspects of musculoskeletal disorders in office work (pp. 3 – 21). London; Bristol: Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, C. & Kohlmann, T. (2007). Rückenschmerzen in Deutschland–ein epidemiologischer Überblick–80 – 90 % der Deutschen sind im Laufe ihres Lebens betroffen. Klinikarzt, 36, 680 – 684. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, S. , Randoll, D. & Buchner, M. (2006). Why do women have back pain more than men? A representative prevalence study in the Federal Republic of Germany. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 22, 738 – 747. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, S. , Schmitt, H. , Zoller, S. & Schiltenwolf, M. (2005). Workplace stress, lifestyle and social factors as correlates of back pain: A representative study of the German working population. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 78, 253 – 269. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shiri, R. , Karppinen, J. , Leino-Arjas, P. , Solovieva, S. & Viikari-Juntura, E. (2010). The association between smoking and low back pain: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Medicine, 123, 87e7 – 87e35. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siltaloppi, M. , Kinnunen, U. & Feldt, T. (2009). Recovery experiences as moderators between psychosocial work characteristics and occupational well-being. Work & Stress, 23, 330 – 348. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. (2001). Work, recovery activities, and individual well-being: A diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 196 – 210. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518 – 528. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. , Binnewies, C. & Mojza, E. J. (2010). Staying well and engaged when demands are high: The role of psychological detachment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 965 – 976. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. & Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 204 – 221. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. , Mojza, E. J. , Binnewies, C. & Scholl, A. (2008). Being engaged at work and detached at home: A week-level study on work engagement, psychological detachment, and affect. Work & Stress, 22, 257 – 276. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thorbjornsson, C. O. , Alfredsson, L. , Fredriksson, K. , Koster, M. , Michelsen, H. , Vingard, E. et al. (1998). Psychosocial and physical risk factors associated with low back pain: A 24 year follow up among women and men in a broad range of occupations. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55, 84 – 90. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Truchon, M. , Cote, D. , Fillion, L. , Arsenault, B. & Dionne, C. (2008). Low-back-pain related disability: An integration of psychological risk factors into the stress process model. Pain, 137, 564 – 573. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Westgaard, R. H. (1996). Effects of psychological demand and stress on neuromuscular function. In S. D. Moon & S. L. Sauter, (Eds.), Beyond biomechanics. Psychosocial aspects of musculoskeletal disorders in office work (pp. 64 – 77). London, Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Westgaard, R. H. (1999). Effects of physical and mental stressors on muscle pain. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 25, 19 – 24. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • White, E. (2010). Helping to promote psychological well-being at work: The role of work engagement, work stress and psychological detachment using the job demands-resources model. The Plymouth Student Scientist, 4, 155 – 180. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zijlstra, F. R. H. & Sonnentag, S. (2006). After work is done: Psychological perspectives on recovery from work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 129 – 138. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar