Skip to main content
Originalia

Psychometrische Gütekriterien des Metakognitionsfragebogens (Kurzversion, MKF-30)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000087

Zusammenfassung.Theoretischer Hintergrund: Metakognitionen wird für das Verständnis verschiedener psychischer Störungen eine wichtige Rolle beigemessen. So kann z.B. übermäßiges Sorgen durch Metakognitionen ausgelöst und aufrechterhalten werden. Fragestellung: Ziel dieser Arbeit war die systematische psychometrische Untersuchung der deutschen Kurzform des Metacognition Questionnaire (MKF-30). Methode: Mittels einer Teilstichprobe (N = 1168) wurde explorativ die Faktorenstruktur des MKF-30 ermittelt. Die ermittelte 5-Faktorenstruktur wurde anschließend konfirmiert (Teilstichprobe 2: N = 1155). Zur Konstruktvalidierung wurden Angst- sowie ein Depressionsfragebogen eingesetzt. Ergebnisse: Es ließen sich die fünf Faktoren des englischen Originals replizieren und konfirmieren. Die Analysen der Itemkennwerte sowie der konvergenten Validität lieferten insgesamt gute Ergebnisse. Schlussfolgerungen: Der MKF-30 kann vorläufig als ein reliables, valides und ökonomisches Instrument zur Erfassung von Metakognitionen angesehen werden.


Psychometric properties of the short German version of the Metacognitions Questionnaire (MKF-30)

Abstract.Background: Metacognitions are likely relevant for a number of mental disorders. For example, excessive worrying can be elicited and maintained as a consequence of metacognitions. Objective: This study was aimed at the validation of the German short form of the Metacognitions Questionnaire (MKF-30). Methods: Using a subsample (N = 1168) we explored the factor-structure of the MKF-30. We then confirmed the resulting five-factor-structure using the remaining subsample 2 (N = 1155). We used other anxiety and mood questionnaires to analyse the construct validity. Results: The five-factor-structur of the English orginal was replicated and confirmed. Item properties and convergent validity were good. Conclusions: The MKF-30 can provisionally be considered a reliable, valid and an economic instrument for the assessment of metacognitions.

Literatur

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed. DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Andor, T. , Gerlach, A. L. , Rist, F. (2008). Superior perception of phasic physiological arousal and the detrimental consequences of the conviction to be aroused on worrying and metacognitions in GAD. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117 (1), 193–205. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley Interscience. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borkovec, T. D. , Roemer, L. (1995). Perceived functions of worry among generalized anxiety disorder subjects: Distraction from more emotionally distressing topics? Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26, 25–30. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. , Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, LA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bühner, M. (2006). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion (2. Aufl.). München: Pearson Studium. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cartwright-Hatton, S. , Wells, A. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: the metacognitions questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 279–296. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, N. D. , Valentiner, D. P. (2000). Does meta-cognitive theory enhance our understanding of pathological worry and anxiety? Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 513–526. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dugas, M. J. , Gagnon, F. , Ladouceur, R. , Freeston, M. H. (1998). Generalized Anxiety Disorder: a preliminary test of a conceptual model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 215–226. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dugas, M. J. , Gagnon, F. , Ladouceur, R. , Freeston, M. H. (2004). The role of intolerance of uncertainty in etiology and maintenance. In R. G. Heimberg, C. L. Turk, D. S. Mennin (Eds.), Generalized Anxiety Disorder – Advances in research and Practice (pp. 143–163). London: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dugas, M. J. , Savard, P. , Gaudet, A. , Turcotte, J. , Laugesen, N. , Robichaud, K. F. et al. (2007). Can the Components of a Cognitive Model Predict the Severity of Generalized Anxiety Disorder? Behavior Therapy, 38, 169–178. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fabrigar, L. R. , MacCallum, R. C. , Wegener, D. T. , Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4 (3), 272–299. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fisseni, H.-J. (2004). Lehrbuch der psychologischen Diagnostik (3. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Freeston, M. H. , Rheaume, J. , Letarte, H. , Dugas, M. J. , Ladouceur, R. (1994). Why do People Worry. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 791–802. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gerlach, A. L. , Andor, T. , Patzelt, J. (2008). Die Bedeutung von Unsicherheitsintoleranz für Generalisierte Angststörung: Modellüberlegungen und Entwicklung einer deutschen Version der Unsicherheitsintoleranz-Skala. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 37 (3), 190–199. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Gosselin, P. , Ladouceur, R. , Langlois, F. , Freeston, M. H. , Dugas, M. J. , Bertrand, J. (2003). Développement et validation d’un nouvel instrument évaluant les croyances erronées à l’égard des inquiétudes. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 53, 199–211. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hoyer, J. , Becker, E. S. , Roth, W. T. (2001). Characteristics of worry in GAD patients, social phobics, and controls. Depression and Anxiety, 13, 89–96. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoyer, J. , Beesdo, K. , Becker, E. S. , Wittchen, H.-U. (2003). Epidemiologie und nosologischer Status der Generalisierten Angststörung. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 32, 267–275. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Hoyer, J. , Beesdo, K. , Gloster, A. , Höfler, M. , Runge, J. , Becker, E. S. (2009). Worry exposure versus applied relaxation in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78, 106–115. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modelling: a researchers guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Laberge, M. , Dugas, M. J. , Ladouceur, R. (2000). Changes in dysfunctional beliefs before and after a cognitive-behavioral treatment for people with generalized anxiety disorder. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32, 91–96. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lienert, G. A. , Raatz, U. (1998). Testaufbau und Testanalyse (6. Aufl.). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, T. J. , Miller, M. L. , Metzger, R. L. , Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and Validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487–495. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Möbius, J. , Hoyer, J. (2003a). Metakognitionsfragebogen (MKF). In J. Hoyer, J. Margraf (Hrsg.), Angstdiagnostik: Grundlagen und Testverfahren (S. 220–223). Berlin: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Möbius, J. , Hoyer, J. (2003b). Anxious Thoughts Inventory. In J. Hoyer, J. Margraf (Hrsg.), Angstdiagnostik: Grundlagen und Testverfahren (S. 220–223). Berlin: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. , Muthén B. O. (2004). Mplus 5.1 [Computer software]. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Newman, M. G. , Zuellig, A. R. , Kachin, K. E. , Constantino, M. J. , Przeworski, A. , Erickson, T. et al. (2002). Preliminary reliability and validity of the generalized anxiety disorder questionnaire-IV: A revised self-report diagnostic measure of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavior Therapy, 33, 215–233. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Papageorgiou, C. , Wells, A. (2003). An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 261–273. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K. , Moosbrugger, H. , Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. M. , Maes, J. (2000). Vorschlag zur Vereinfachung des Beck-Depressions-Inventars (BDI). Diagnostica, 46 (1), 38–46. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. M. , Altstotter-Gleich, C. , Hinz, A. , Maes, J. , Brahler, E. (2006). Norms for the simplified Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-V) in a non-clinical population. Diagnostica, 52, 51–59. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Stöber, J. (1995). Besorgnis: Ein Vergleich dreier Inventare zur Erfassung allgemeiner Sorgen. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 16, 50–63. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Upatel, T. , Gerlach, A. L. (2008). Appraisal of activating thoughts in generalized anxiety disorder. Journal Of Behavior Therapy And Experimental Psychiatry, 39 (3), 234–249. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, A. (1994a). A multidimensional measure of worry: development and preliminary validation of the Anxious Thoughts Inventory. Anxiety Stress and Coping, 6, 289–299. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, A. (1994b). Attention and the control of worry. In G. C. L. Davey, F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 91–114). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, A. (1995). Metacognition and Worry: A cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 301–320. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, A. (1997). Generalised Anxiety Disorder. In A. Wells (Ed.), Cognitive Therapy of Anxiety Disorders: A Practice Manual and Conceptual Guide (pp. 200–235). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, A. (2004). A cognitive model of GAD: Metacognitions and pathological worry. In R. G. Heimberg, C. L. Turk, D. S. Mennin (Eds.), Generalized anxiety disorder – advances in research and practice (pp. 164–186). London: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, A. (2006). The Anxious Thoughts Inventory and Related Measures of Metacognition and Worry. In C. L. Graham, A. Wells (Eds.), Worry and its Psychological Disorders: Theory, assessment and Treatment (pp. 121–136). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, A. (2007). Cognition about cognition: Metacognitive therapy and change in generalized anxiety disorder and social phobia. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 14, 18–25. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, A. , Carter, K. (1999). Preliminary tests of a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 585–594. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, A. , Carter, K. (2001). Further tests of a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder: Metacognitions and worry in GAD, panic disorder, social phobia, depression, and nonpatients. Behaviour and Therapy, 33, 579–583. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, A. , Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 385–396. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, A. , Davies, M. (1994). The Thought Control Questionnaire: a measure of individual differences in the control of unwanted thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 871–878. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar