Skip to main content
Original Articles

Self-Regulated Learning as a Competence

Implications of Theoretical Models for Assessment Methods

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.216.2.102

Lively research on self-regulated learning has produced a great number of models of self-regulated learning competence and it is still a challenge to integrate them within a single coherent framework. However, such a framework is necessary for, among other reasons, the development of valid assessment methods. We argue that one common characteristic of all models is that they consider the competence to make solid comparisons as a key competence of self-regulated learning. However, the kind of comparisons and the kind of standards used for these comparisons differ between models. The same is true for assessment methods. Valid assessment methods also have implemented comparisons and they also differ concerning the kind of comparison and the kind of standards used for assessment. In order to categorize both, models as well as assessment methods, we propose to distinguish between component models and process models of self-regulated learning. Component models imply the use of offline standards for assessment whereas process models imply the use of online standards. Both offline and online standards can be either quantitative or qualitative. We show that using qualitative standards leads to a higher validity of the assessment than using quantitative standards. This advantage of qualitative standards can be shown for both offline standards as well as online standards.

References

  • Anderson, J.R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Artelt, C. (2000). Strategisches Lernen [Strategic learning]. Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Artelt, C. (2006). Lernstrategien in der Schule [Learning strategies in school]. In H. Mandl, H.F. Friedrich (Eds.), Handbuch Lernstrategien [Handbook of learning strategies] (pp. 337–351). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Artelt, C. , Baumert, J. , Julius-McElvany, N. (2003). Selbstreguliertes Lernen: Motivation und Strategien in den Ländern der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Self-regulated learning: Motivation and strategies in the German federal states]. In J. Baumert, C. Artelt, E. Klieme, M. Neubrand, M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele , et al. (Eds.), PISA 2000 – Ein differenzierter Blick auf die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [PISA 2000 – A closer look at the German federal states] (pp. 51–76). Opladen: Leske + Budrich. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Artelt, C. , Demmrich, A. , Baumert, J. (2001). Selbstreguliertes Lernen [Self-regulated learning]. In J. Baumert, C. Artelt, E. Klieme, M. Neubrand, M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele , et al. (Eds.), PISA 2000 – Ein differenzierter Blick auf die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [PISA 2000 – A closer look at the German federal states] (pp. 271–298). Opladen: Leske + Budrich. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baumert, J. , Köller, O. (1996). Lernstrategien und schulische Leistungen [Learning strategies and school achievement]. In J. Möller, O. Köller (Eds.), Emotionen, Kognitionen und Schulleistung [Emotions, cognitions, and school achievement] (pp. 137–154). Weinheim: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Biggs, J.B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 266–279. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–475. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Butler, D.L. , Winne, P.H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Commission of the European Community (2000). A memorandum for lifelong learning. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Desoete, A. , Roeyers, H. , De Clercq, A. (2003). Can offline metacognition enhance mathematical problem solving? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 188–200. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Entwistle, N.J. (1988). Motivational factors in student’s approaches to learning. In R.R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 21–52). New York: Plenum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Funke, J. , Töpfer, S. , Wagener, S. (1998). Finite Automaten als Instrumente zur Erfassung von Problemlösefähigkeiten bei Schülern [Finite automata for assessing problem solving competence of students]. Heidelberg: Psychologisches Institut der Universität Heidelberg. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jamieson-Noel, D.L. , Winne, P.H. (2003). Comparing self-reports to traces of studying behavior as representations of students’ studying and achievement. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17, 159–171. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Leopold, C. , den Elzen-Rump, V. , Leutner, D. (2007). Self-regulated learning from science texts. In M. Prenzel (Ed.), Studies on the educational quality of schools. The final report on the DFG Priority Program (pp. 221–238). Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leutner, D. , Leopold, C. (2006). Selbstregulation beim Lernen aus Sachtexten [Self-regulation when learning from science texts]. In H. Mandl, H.F. Friedrich (Eds.), Handbuch Lernstrategien [Handbook of learning strategies] (pp. 162–171). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lompscher, J. (1994). Lernstrategien: Zugänge auf der Reflexions- und Handlungsebene [Learning strategies: Theoretical perspectives on the reflective and the behavioral level]. In LLF-Berichte 9 [LLF reports 9] (pp. 114–129). Potsdam: Universität Potsdam. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, G.A. , Galanter, E. , Pribram, K.H. (1965). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paris, S.G. , Lipson, M.Y. , Wixson, K.K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pintrich, P.R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pintrich, P.R. , Smith, D.A.F. , Garcia, T. , McKeachie, W.J. (1991). The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: NCRIPTAL, The University of Michigan. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pressley, M. , Borkowski, J.G. , Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 857–867. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ramm, G. , Prenzel, M. , Baumert, J. , Blum, W. , Lehmann, R. , Leutner, D. et al. (Eds.). (2006). PISA 2003. Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente [PISA 2003. Documentation of the assessment instruments]. Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schlagmüller, M. , & Schneider, W. (2007). Würzburger Lesestrategie-Wissenstest für die Klassen 7–12 (WLST 7–12) [Würzburg learning strategy knowledge test for grades 7–12 (WLST 7–12)]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schreiber, B. (1998). Selbstreguliertes Lernen [Self-regulated learning]. Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Spiel, C. , Schober, B. (2002). Lebenslanges Lernen als Ziel: Zur systematischen Förderung von Bildungsmotivation [The goal of life-long learning. Toward a systematic support of learning motivation]. Erziehung und Unterricht, 152, 1282–1293. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thillmann, H. (2007). Selbstreguliertes Lernen durch Experimentieren: Von der Erfassung zur Förderung [Self-regulated learning by experimenting. Assessment and support] (Dissertation). Universität Duisburg-Essen, Fachbereich Bildungswissenschaften, Essen. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Veenman, M.V.J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multi-method designs. In C. Artelt, B. Moschner (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition. Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis [Learning strategies and metacognition. Theoretical and practical implications] (pp. 77–99). Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weinstein, C.E. (1987). Learning and study strategies inventory (LASSI). Clearwater, FL: H und H Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wild, K.-P. , Schiefele, U. , Winteler, A. (1992). LIST – Ein Verfahren zur Erfassung von Lernstrategien im Studium [LIST – An instrument for assessing learning strategies of students]. Neubiberg: Gelbe Reihe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Winne, P.H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 327–353. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winne, P.H. , Hadwin, A.F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Winne, P.H. , Perry, N.E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wirth, J. (2004). Selbstregulation von Lernprozessen [Self-regulation of learning strategies]. Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wirth, J. (2005). Selbstreguliertes Lernen in komplexen und dynamischen Situationen. Die Nutzung von Handlungsdaten zur Erfassung verschiedener Aspekte der Lernprozessregulation [Self-regulated learning in complex and dynamic situations. Using behavioral data for assessing specific aspects of self-regulated learning]. In C. Artelt, B. Moschner (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis [Learning strategies and metacognition: Theoretical and practical implications] (pp. 101–127). Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wirth, J. , Leutner, D. (2006). Selbstregulation beim Lernen in interaktiven Lernumgebungen [Self-regulation when learning in interactive learning environments]. In H. Mandl, H.F. Friedrich (Eds.), Handbuch Lernstrategien [Handbook of learning strategies] (pp. 172–184). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, B.J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D.H. Schunk, B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning (pp. 1–19). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar