Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000584

Abstract.Objective: There is limited knowledge about the effects of a workshop intervention on responsible reporting on suicide (RRS) by media professionals. The study aimed to test how a workshop can shape reporting-relevant attitudes and beliefs among media professionals. Method: A pre–postintervention survey of Swiss media professionals (N = 26, 55.7% male, Mage = 38.1, SDage = 12.8, all Swiss nationals) was conducted. All participants received the same intervention and survey questions. The analytical focus was on within-person changes caused by the workshop intervention. Results: Among media professionals, the workshop intervention increased perceived knowledge sufficiency about RRS, raised awareness that RRS can save lives, decreased insecurities related to RRS, and reduced the misperception that there are no clear recommendations about RRS. Limitations: Despite the missing randomization of workshop participants, the repeated measures design allows to speak to the short-term changes in RRS. Conclusion: An RRS workshop intervention has multifaceted positive effects on media professionals. The study found no evidence for unintended effects of the intervention.

References

  • Bohanna, I., & Wang, X. (2012). Media guidelines for the responsible reporting of suicide. Crisis, 33(4), 190–198. 10.1027/0227-5910/a000137 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Frey, C., Michel, K., & Valach, L. (1997). Suicide reporting in Swiss print media: Responsible or irresponsible? European Journal of Public Health, 7(1), 15–19. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gould, M., Jamieson, P., & Romer, D. (2003). Media contagion and suicide among the young. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(9), 1269–1284. 10.1177/0002764202250670 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Michel, K., Frey, C., Wyss, K., & Valach, L. (2000). An exercise in improving suicide reporting in print media. Crisis, 21(2), 71–79. 10.1027//0227-5910.21.2.71 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 105–125. 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.105 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Niederkrotenthaler, T., & Sonneck, G. (2007). Assessing the impact of media guidelines for reporting on suicides in Austria: Interrupted time series analysis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 41(5), 419–428. 10.1080/00048670701266680 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Niederkrotenthaler, T., Voracek, M., Herberth, A., Till, B., Strauss, M., Etzersdorfer, E., … Sonneck, G. (2010). Role of media reports in completed and prevented suicide: Werther v. Papageno effects. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 197, 234–243. 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.074633 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Pirkis, J. E., Blood, R. W., Beautrais, A., Burgess, P. M., & Skehan, J. (2006). Media guidelines on the reporting of suicide. Crisis, 27(2), 82–87. 10.1027/0227-5910.27.2.82 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Reinemann, C., & Scherr, S. (2011). Der Werther-Defekt: Plädoyer für einen neuen Blick auf den Zusammenhang von suizidalem Verhalten und Medien [The Werther defect: Plea for a new view on the association between suicidal behavior and the media]. Publizistik, 56(1), 89–94. 10.1007/s11616-010-0109-y First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schäfer, R., Althaus, D., Brosius, H.-B., & Hegerl, U. (2006). Suizidberichte in Nürnberger Printmedien – Häufigkeit und Form der Berichterstattung vor und nach der Implementierung eines Medienguides [Suicide reports in Nuremberg print media – frequency and form of reporting before and after the implementation of a media guide]. Psychiatrische Praxis, 33, 132–137. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Scherr, S. (2013). Medien und Suizide: Überblick über die kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschung zum Werther-Effekt [Media and suicide: Review of research on the Werther effect in communication science]. Suizidprophylaxe, 40(3), 96–107. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scherr, S. (2016). Depression – Medien – Suizid: Zur empirischen Relevanz von Depressionen und Medien für die Suizidalität [Depression – media – suicide: On the empirical relevance of depression and media for suicidality]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scherr, S., Arendt, F., & Schäfer, M. (2016). Supporting reporting: On the positive effects of text- and video-based awareness material on responsible journalistic suicide news writing. Archives of Suicide Research, 21(4), 646–658. 10.1080/13811118.2016.1222975 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Scherr, S., & Steinleitner, A. (2015). Zwischen dem Werther- und Papageno-Effekt [Between Werther and Papageno effects]. Nervenarzt, 86(5), 557–565. 10.1007/s00115-015-4260-6 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Skehan, J., Burns, L. S., & Hazell, T. (2009). The Response Ability Project: Integrating the reporting of suicide and mental illness into journalism curricula. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 64(2), 191–204. 10.1177/​107769​580906400205 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skehan, J., Greenhalgh, S., Hazell, T., & Pirkis, J. (2006). Reach, awareness and uptake of media guidelines for reporting suicide and mental illness: An Australian perspective. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 8(4), 29–35. 10.1080/14623730.2006.9721749 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • World Health Organization. (2017). Preventing suicide: A resource for media professionals. Update 2017. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/258814/1/WHO-MSD-MER-17.5-eng.pdf?ua=1 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar