Skip to main content
Articles

An Electromyographic Examination of Response Execution and Inhibition in Between-Hand Choice Reaction Time

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.330

Abstract: In between-hand choice reaction time (RT) tasks, the activation of the cerebral motor structures involved in the required response is accompanied by an inhibition of the structures involved in the alternative response. The objectives were (1) to check whether the inhibition observed at the central level can be accompanied by signs of deactivation at the peripheral level during response execution and (2) to assess whether time preparation affects response execution. Surface electromyographic (EMG) activity of the first dorsal interosseus was recorded during the performance of a between-hand choice visual RT task in which the foreperiod duration was manipulated. The contraction of the muscle involved in the required response was accompanied by a reduction in the EMG activity of the muscle involved in the nonrequired response. The foreperiod duration influenced this EMG pattern. The findings reveal peripheral signs of a deactivation of the non-required response and suggest that time preparation influences the activity of the muscles involved in both the required and the nonrequired response. The present results are compatible with the view that, at least in between-hand choice RT tasks, the motor command specifies both the activation of the central structures involved in the required response and the inhibition of the central structures involved in the nonrequired response. They further indicate that time preparation affects the activity of the response agonists.

References

  • Angel, R. , Garland, H. , Alston, W. (1970). Interaction of spinal and supraspinal mechanisms during voluntary innervation of human muscle. Experimental Neurology, 28, 230– 242 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bertelson, P. , Boons, J.P. (1960). Time uncertainty and choice reaction time. Nature, 187, 531– 532 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burle, B. , Bonnet, M. , Vidal, F. , Possamaï, C.A. , Hasbroucq, T. (2002). A transcranial magnetic stimulation study of information processing in the motor cortex: Relationship between the silent period and the reaction time delay. Psychophysiology, 39, 207– 217 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burle, B. , Vidal, F. , Tandonnet, C. , Hasbroucq, H. (2004). Physiological evidence in response inhibition in choice reaction-time tasks. Brain and Cognition, 56, 153– 164 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carbonnell, L. , Hasbroucq, T. , Grapperon, J. , Vidal, F. (2004). Response selection and motor areas: A behavioral and electrophysiological study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 2164– 2174 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coles, M.G.H. , Gratton, G. , Bashore, T.R. , Eriksen, C. , Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529– 552 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hasbroucq, T. , Akamatsu, M. , Burle, B. , Bonnet, M. , Possamaï, C.A. (2000). Changes in spinal excitability during choice reaction time: The H-reflex as a probe of information transmission. Psychophysiology, 37, 385– 393 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hasbroucq, T. , Akamatsu, M. , Mouret, I. , Seal, J. (1995). Finger pairings in choice reaction-time tasks: Does the between-hands advantage reflect response preparation?. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 251– 262 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hasbroucq, T. , Burle, B. , Akamatsu, M. , Vidal, F. , Possamaï, C.A. (2001). An electromyographic investigation of the effect of stimulus-response mapping on choice reaction time. Psychophysiology, 38, 157– 162 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mattes, S. , Ulrich, R. (1997). Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 1089– 1097 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Näätänen, R. (1971). Non-aging foreperiods and simple reaction time. Acta Psychologica (Amst), 35, 316– 327 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Praamstra, P. , Seiss, E. (2005). The neurophysiology of response competition: Motor cortex activation and inhibition following subliminal response priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 483– 493 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sanders, A.F. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Smid, H.G.O. , Mulder, G. , Mulder, L.J.M. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of the continuous flow. Acta Psychologica, 74, 169– 201 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tandonnet, C. , Burle, B. , Hasbroucq, T. , Vidal, F. (2005). Spatial enhancement of EEG traces by surface Laplacian estimation: Comparison between local and global methods. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 18– 24 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tandonnet, C. , Burle, B. , Vidal, F. , Hasbroucq, T. (2003). The influence of time preparation on motor processes assessed by surface Laplacian estimation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 2376– 2384 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taniguchi, Y. , Burle, B. , Vidal, F. , Bonnet, M. (2001). Deficit in motor cortical activity for simultaneous bimanual responses. Experimental Brain Research, 137, 259– 268 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vidal, F. , Grapperon, J. , Bonnet, M. , Hasbroucq, T. (2003). The nature of unilateral motor commands in between-hand choice tasks as revealed by surface laplacian estimation. Psychophysiology, 40, 796– 805 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winer, B.J. (1970). Statistical principles in experimental design . London: McGraw-Hill First citation in articleGoogle Scholar