Semantic Conflict Processing in the Color-Word Stroop and the Emotional Stroop
Event-Related Potential (ERP) Correlates
Abstract
With the aim of establishing the temporal locus of the semantic conflict in color-word Stroop and emotional Stroop phenomena, we analyzed the Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) elicited by nonwords, incongruent and congruent color words, colored words with positive and negative emotional valence, and colored words with neutral valence. The incongruent, positive, negative, and neutral stimuli produced interference in the behavioral response to the color of the stimuli. The P150/N170 amplitude was sensitive to the semantic equivalence of both dimensions of the congruent color words. The P3b amplitude was smaller in response to incongruent color words and to positive, negative, and neutral colored words than in response to the congruent color words and colored nonwords. There were no differences in the ERPs induced in response to colored words with positive, negative, and neutral valence. Therefore, the P3b amplitude was sensitive to interference from the semantic content of the incongruent, positive, negative, and neutral words in the color-response task, independently of the emotional content of the colored words. In addition, the P3b amplitude was smaller in response to colored words with positive, negative, and neutral valence than in response to the incongruent color words. Overall, these data indicate that the temporal locus of the semantic conflict generated by the incongruent color words (in the color-word Stroop task) and by colored words with positive, negative, and neutral valence (in the emotional Stroop task) appears to occur in the range 300–450 ms post-stimulus.
References
(2003). Event-related potential to Stroop and reverse Stroop stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 47, 1–21.
(2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.
(2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.
(1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instructions manual and affective ratings. Gainesville, FL: Centre for Research in Psychophysiology University of Florida.
(1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
(2011). Increase anterior brain activation to correct response on high-conflict Stroop task in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology, 122, 107–113.
(2011). Neural correlates of stimulus and response interference in a 2-1 mapping stroop task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 80, 129–138.
(1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.
(2003). Stroop interference, practice, and aging. Neuropsychology, Developmental, and Cognition. Section B, Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 10, 85–98.
(2003). On the role of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility in the Stroop effect. Memory and Cognition, 31, 353–359.
(1998). Addressing misallocation of variance in principal component analysis of event-related potentials. Brain Topography, 11, 43–55.
(2004). Principal components analysis of ERPs data. In , Event-related potentials: A methods handbook (pp. 189–207). Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
(1981). Surprise! … Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18, 493–513.
(1992). Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 470–484.
(1980). The locus of interference in the Stroop task: When you read “blue”, do you see “red”? Psychophysiology, 17, 308–309.
(1981). The Stroop effect: Brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science, 214, 938–940.
(1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Memory and Cognition, 1, 106–120.
(1996). Effects of caffeine, practice, and mode of presentation on Stroop task performance. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 54, 309–315.
(1994). Effects of practice of serial test of attention in healthy subjects. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 436–447.
(2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152–170.
(2009). Automatic processing of emotional words during an emotional Stroop task. Neuroreport, 20, 776–781.
(2011). Time course of implicit processing and explicit processing of emotional faces and emotional words. Biological Psychology, 87, 265–274.
(2011). Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: An ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 79, 356–363.
(1998). The contribution of cognitive evoked potentials to knowledge of mechanism on the Stroop test. Clinical Neurophysiology, 28, 207–220.
(1983). A new method for off-line removal ocular artefact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468–484.
(2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage, 30, 1383–1400.
(2004). Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1090–1103.
(2004). Effects of borderline personality disorder features and a family history of alcohol or drug dependence on P300 in adolescents. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 53, 57–70.
(1999). P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 367–373.
(1980). The event-related potentials as an index of display monitoring workload. Human Factors, 22, 211–224.
(2005). The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 2613–2631.
(2009). Emotion and attention in visual word processing – An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 80, 75–83.
(1987). A psychophysiological assessment of operator workload during simulated flight missions. Human Factors, 29, 145–160.
(2005). Age differences in attentional control. An event-related potential approach. Psychophysiology, 42, 407–416.
(1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792–795.
(1999). Toward a functional explanation of the locus of the Stroop Interference: A psychophysiological study. Brain and Cognition, 40, 167–170.
(2007). Trait anxiety modulates supraliminal and subliminal threat: Brain potential evidence for early and late processing influences. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 25–36.
(2004). Changes in P300 amplitude during an active standard auditory oddball task. Biological Psychology, 66, 153–167.
(1999). Semantic competition as the basis of Stroop interference: Evidence from color-word matching tasks. Psychological Science, 10, 35–40.
(1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
(1998). Training on integrated versus separated Stroop task: The progression of interference and facilitation. Memory and Cognition, 26, 201–211.
(2007). Age-related changes in cognitive conflict processing: And event-related potential study. Neurobiology of Aging, 28, 1925–1935.
(2009). Stroop interference effect in schizophrenic patients: An electrophysiological approach. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 248–257.
(2004). Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: The role of fast and slow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 382–392.
(2008). Neurophysiological evidence of cognitive inhibition anomalies in persons with major depressive disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 1578–1589.
(2003). Neurophysiological evidence for disturbances of conflict processing in patients with schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 679–688.
(1969). Categories of interference: Verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting. British Journal of Psychology, 60, 329–346.
(1973). Selective attention to words and colours. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 387–397.
(1986). Apparent response incompatibility effects on P3 latency depend on the task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 64, 424–437.
(2007). The automaticity of emotional Stroop: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 184–199.
(1975). Attention and cognitive control. In , Information processing and cognition (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2002). Effect of mild head injury on event-related potential correlates of Stroop task performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 828–837.
(1997). The Stroop test evokes a negative brain potential, the N400. International Journal of Neuroscience, 91, 85–94.
(2007). The Spanish adaptation of ANEW (affective norms for English words). Behavior Research Methods, 39, 600–605.
(2006). P300-based Stroop study with low probability and target Stroop oddballs: The evidence still favours the response selection hypothesis. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 240–250.
(2010). Time course of attentional bias in anxiety: Emotion and gender specificity. Psychophysiology, 47, 247–259.
(2000). LEXESP: Léxico informatizado del español
[LEXESP: Lexicon of Computer Science in Spanish Language] . Barcelona, Spain: Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.(2003). Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event-related potentials. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 489–493.
(1998). Stablishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport, 9, 2195–2200.
(1977). Conceptual encoding and locus of the Stroop effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 245–265.
(2001). The role of time pressure on the emotional Stroop task. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 471–481.
(2010). The time course of activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulated cortex during top-down attentional control. Neuroimage, 50, 1292–1302.
(1989). Resource reciprocity: An event-related brain potential analysis. Acta Psychologica, 70, 77–97.
(1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 387–401.
(2010). Attentional bias to negative emotion as a function of approach and withdrawal anger styles: An ERP investigation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 76, 9–18.
(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
(2010). Stimulus and response conflict in the color-word Stroop task: A combined electro-myography and event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1325, 63–76.
(2009). Early frontal responses elicited by physical threat words in an emotional Stroop task: Modulation by anxiety sensitivity. Biological Psychology, 81, 48–57.
(2007). Event-related potentials during an emotional Stroop task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63, 221–231.
(2008). Neural correlates of intrusion of emotion words in a modified Stroop task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 67, 23–34.
(2002). The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulated cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 593–602.
(2005). Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 27, 497–504.
(1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131–156.
(2005). Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. Psychophysiology, 19, 165–181.
(2005). Generalizability of carry-over effects in the emotional Stroop task. Behaviour Research Therapy, 43, 715–732.
(2003). Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digit-location tasks. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1122–1135.
(2004). The effects of aging on controlled attention and conflict processing in the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 101–113.
(1999). Event-related neural activity associated with the Stroop task. Cognitive and Brain Research, 8, 157–164.
(2000a). Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults. Psychophysiology, 37, 179–189.
(2000b). Effects of task context and fluctuations of attention on neural activity supporting performance of Stroop task. Brain Research, 873, 102–111.
(2004). Sensitivity of medial frontal cortex to response and nonresponse conflict. Psychophysiology, 41, 739–748.
(2005). Neural correlates of conflict processing. Experimental Brain Research, 167, 38–48.
(1983). Performance of concurrent task: A psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. Science, 221, 1080–1082.
(1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3–24.
(2009). Event-related potentials with the Stroop colour-word task: Timing of semantic conflict. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72, 246–252.
