News Within the European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Never Change a Running System, or Change it?
References
2010). A historical analysis of the European Journal of Psychological Assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 238–247. doi 10.1027/1015-5759/a000032
(2007). Higher-Order Factors in a Five-Factor Personality Inventory and its Relation to Social Desirability. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 63–70. doi 10.1027/1015-5759.23.2.63
(2002). Fluid and crystallized intelligence and the Berlin Model of Intelligence Structure (BIS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 97–112. doi 10.1027//1015-5759.18.2.97
(2000). Detecting measurement invariance in organizational surveys. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 20–30. doi 10.1027//1015-5759.16.1.20
(2013). Intellect: A theoretical framework for personality traits related to intellectual achievements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 885–906. doi 10.1037/a0031918
(2003). The overclaiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 890–904.
(2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524–539.
(2005). A latent state-trait analysis of implicit and explicit personality measures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 100–107. doi 10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.100
(2006). Predicting spontaneous big five behavior with implicit association tests. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 13–20. doi 10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.13
(1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89–99. doi 10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.89
K. (2013). Lost in translation: Thoughts regarding the translation of existing psychological measures into other languages. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 81–83. doi 10.1027/1015-5759/a000167
(2013). Getting entangled in the nomological net. Thoughts on validity and conceptual overlap. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 157–161. doi 10.1027/1015-5759/a000173
(