Advances and Continuing Challenges in Objective Personality Testing
References
2011). The Risk Propensity Task (PTR): A proposal for a behavioral performance-based computer test for assessing risk propensity. Anales de Psicologia, 27, 862–870.
(2011). Modeling effects of faking on an objective personality test. Journal of Individual Differences, 32, 210–218. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000053
(2014). Economic games: A performance-based assessment of fairness and altruism. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 178–192. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000183
(1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
(1941). An objective test of character-temperatment I. Journal of General Psychology, 25, 59–73.
(1944). An objective test of character-temperatment II. Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 99–114.
(1946). Description and measurement of personality. New York, NY: World Book.
(1955). Handbook for the objective-analytic personality test batteries: (including adult and child O-A batteries). Savoy, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
(1958). What is “objective” in “objective personality tests”? Journal of Consulting Psychology, 5, 285–289.
(1977). The scientific analysis of personality and motivation. London, UK: Academic Press.
(1967). Objective personality and motivation tests: A theoretical introduction and practical compendium. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
(2008). Analyzing the convergent and discriminant validity of states and traits: Development and applications of multimethod latent state-trait models. Psychological Assessment, 20, 270–280. doi: 10.1037/a0012812
(1970). Essentials of psychological testing. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
(1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
(2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368. doi: 10.1037/a0014211
(2012). Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-concepts of intelligence predict performance on tests of intelligence. European Journal of Personality, 26, 212–220.
(2010). Convergence of direct, indirect, and objective risk taking measures in the domain of gambling: The moderating role of impulsiveness and self-control. Journal of Psychology, 218, 20–27.
(1996). Effects of dissimulation on self-report and objective measures of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 335–343.
(2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
(1946). German applied psychology during World War II. American Psychologist, 1, 151–161.
(2008). When and why do implicit measures predict behaviour? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 285–338. doi: 10.1080/10463280802556958
(2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. [Review]. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731.
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
(2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. doi: 10.1037/a0015575
(2008). Convergent and predictive validity of implicit and explicit anxiety measures as a function of specificity similarity and content similarity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 254–262. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.254
(1975). Objektive Testbatterie, OA-TB 75
([Objective Test Battery, OA-TB 75] . Weinheim: Beltz.2004). An algorithm for the separation of skill and working style. Psychology Science, 4, 433–450.
(2001). Herkömmliche Persönlichkeitsfragebogen und Objektive Persönlichkeitstests im “Wettstreit” um Unverfälschbarkeit
([Personality questionnaires and objective personality tests in contest: More or less fakeable?] Report Psychologie, 26, 298–304.2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385. doi: 10.1177/0146167205275613
(2006). What moderates implicit-explicit consistency? European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 335–390.
(2008). Advances and challenges in the indirect measurement of individual differences at age 10 of the implicit association test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 207–209. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.207
(1965). Personality factors in objective test devices. San Diego, CA: Knapp.
(2014). The tendency to fall for distracting information while making judgments – development and validation of the Objective Heuristic Thinking Test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 30, 193–207. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000214
(2014). Evaluating the construct validity of objective personality tests using a Multitrait-Multimethod-Multioccasion (MTMM-MO) approach. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 208–230. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000212
(2009). The technique of objective personality-tests sensu R. B. Cattell nowadays: The Viennese pool of computerized tests aimed at experiment-based assessment of behavior. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41, 1024–1036.
(1996). Arbeitshaltungen – Kurze Testbatterie: Anspruchsniveau, Frustrationstoleranz, Leistungsmotivation, Impulsivität/Reflexivität
([Working Style – A short test-battery: Level of aspiration, achievement motivation, frustration tolerance, impulsiveness/reflexiveness][Software and Manual] . Frankfurt/M.: Swets Test Services.2003). The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 26–33. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.11.1.26
(2003). Evaluation of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviors. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 475–479. doi: 10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00036-8
(2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology–Applied, 8, 75–84. doi: 10.1037//1076-898x.8.2.75
(2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology – Applied, 8, 75–84. doi: 10.1037//1076-898X.8.2.75
(2006). Advancing personality assessment terminology: Time to retire “objective” and “projective” as personality test descriptors. [Editorial Material]. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 223–225. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8703_01
(2007). Implicit-explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 65–69.
(2012). Teachers’ burnout is related to lowered speed and lowered quality for demanding short-term tasks. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54, 20–35.
(2007). Standortbestimmung und Zukunft Objektiver Persönlichkeitstests
([Current Situation and Future of Objective Personality Tests] . Report Psychologie, 75.2006). Belastbarkeits-Assessment: Computerisierte Objektive Persönlichkeits-Testbatterie – Deutsch (BAcO-D)
([Stress resistance assessment: Computerized objective test-battery – German version]. Test: Software und Manual Frankfurt/M.: Harcourt Assessment.2006). Theorie und Praxis Objektiver Persönlichkeitstests
([Theory and praxis of objective personality tests] . Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.2006). Objektive Tests in der Persönlichkeitsforschung
([Objective personality tests in personality research] . In , Theorie und Praxis Objektiver Persönlichkeitstests[Theory and practice of objective personality tests] (pp. 16–23). Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293.
(2014). Personality in action: Can brief behavioral personality tests predict children’s academic and social adjustment across the transition to secondary school? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 169–177. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000186
(2007). Convergence of conventional and behavior-based measures: Towards a multimethod approach in the assessment of vocational interests. Psychology Science Quarterly, 49, 168–183.
(2007). Assessing behavior in standardized settings: The role of objective personality tests. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 537–546.
(2008). Multimethodische Objektive Interessentestbatterie (MOI)
([Multi-methodic objective test battery] . Mödling, Austria: Schuhfried.2014). Submerging the surface of conscious emotions: Using the IPANAT to measure implicit trait and state affect. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 231–237. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000190
(2010). Can we predict risk-taking behavior? Two behavioral tests for predicting guessing tendencies in a multiple-choice test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 87–94. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000013
(2006). The objective assessment of personality: Cattells’s T-data revisited and more. Psychology Science, 48, 53–68.
(2007). Objektiver Leistungsmotivations Test (OLMT)
([Objective Achievement Motivation Test] [Software and Manual] . Mödling, Austria: Dr. G. Schuhfried GmbH.1975). Objektive Persönlichkeitsmessung in diagnostischer und klinischer Psychologie
([Objective Measurement of Personality in Assesssment and Clinical Psychology] . Weinheim: Beltz.2006). Conceptual, theoretical, and historical foundations of multimethod assessment. In , Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 9–25). New York, NY: American Psychological Association.
(2009a). Moderated consistency between direct, indirect, and behavioral indicators of dispositions Retrieved from www.uni-landau.de/schmittmanfred/english/forschung/IAT/index.html
(2009b). Person x situation-interactions as moderators. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 267.
(2010). On the diversity of dynamic person x situation interactions. European Journal of Personality, 24, 497–500.
(2013). Proposal of a nonlinear interaction of person and situation (NIPS) model. Frontiers in Psychology in Personality Science and Individual Differences, 4, 499.
(in press ). A model of moderated convergence between direct, indirect, and behavioral measures of personality traits. In , Behavior Based Assessment: Going beyond Self Report in the Personality, Affective, Motivation, and Social Domains. Göttingen: Hogrefe.1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389–408.
(2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.
(2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126.
(2007). Fakability of different measurement methods for achievement motivation: Questionnaire, semi-projective, and objective. Psychology Science, 49, 291–307.
(2010). Investigating Measures of Achievement Motivation(s). Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 15–21.
(