Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000213
Free first page

References

  • Aguado, D. , Rubio, V. J. , Lucía, B. (2011). The Risk Propensity Task (PTR): A proposal for a behavioral performance-based computer test for assessing risk propensity. Anales de Psicologia, 27, 862–870. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Arendasy, M. , Sommer, M. , Herle, M. , Schützhofer, B. , Inwanschitz, D. (2011). Modeling effects of faking on an objective personality test. Journal of Individual Differences, 32, 210–218. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000053 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Baumert, A. , Schlösser, T. , Schmitt, M. (2014). Economic games: A performance-based assessment of fairness and altruism. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 178–192. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000183 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, D. T. , Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. (1941). An objective test of character-temperatment I. Journal of General Psychology, 25, 59–73. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. (1944). An objective test of character-temperatment II. Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 99–114. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. (1946). Description and measurement of personality. New York, NY: World Book. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. (1955). Handbook for the objective-analytic personality test batteries: (including adult and child O-A batteries). Savoy, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. (1958). What is “objective” in “objective personality tests”? Journal of Consulting Psychology, 5, 285–289. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. , Kline, P. (1977). The scientific analysis of personality and motivation. London, UK: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. , Warburton, F. W. (1967). Objective personality and motivation tests: A theoretical introduction and practical compendium. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Courvoisier, D. S. , Nussbeck, F. W. , Eid, M. , Cole, D. A. (2008). Analyzing the convergent and discriminant validity of states and traits: Development and applications of multimethod latent state-trait models. Psychological Assessment, 20, 270–280. doi: 10.1037/a0012812 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing. New York, NY: Harper & Row. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cronbach, L. J. , Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J. , Teige-Mocigemba, S. , Spruyt, A. , Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368. doi: 10.1037/a0014211 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dislich, F. X. R. , Imhoff, R. , Banse, R. , Altstötter-Gleich, C. , Zinkernagel, A. , Schmitt, M. (2012). Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-concepts of intelligence predict performance on tests of intelligence. European Journal of Personality, 26, 212–220. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dislich, F. X. R. , Zinkernagel, A. , Ortner, T. M. , Schmitt, M. (2010). Convergence of direct, indirect, and objective risk taking measures in the domain of gambling: The moderating role of impulsiveness and self-control. Journal of Psychology, 218, 20–27. First citation in articleAbstractGoogle Scholar

  • Elliot, S. , Lawty-Jones, M. , Jackson, C. (1996). Effects of dissimulation on self-report and objective measures of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 335–343. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. , Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fitts, P. M. (1946). German applied psychology during World War II. American Psychologist, 1, 151–161. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Friese, M. , Hofmann, W. , Schmitt, M. (2008). When and why do implicit measures predict behaviour? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 285–338. doi: 10.1080/10463280802556958 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. , Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. [Review]. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , McGhee, D. E. , Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , Poehlman, T. A. , Uhlmann, E. L. , Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. doi: 10.1037/a0015575 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gschwendner, T. , Hofmann, W. , Schmitt, M. (2008). Convergent and predictive validity of implicit and explicit anxiety measures as a function of specificity similarity and content similarity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 254–262. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.254 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Häcker, H. , Schmidt, L. R. , Schwenkmezger, P. , Utz, H. E. (1975). Objektive Testbatterie, OA-TB 75 [Objective Test Battery, OA-TB 75]. Weinheim: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Häusler, J. (2004). An algorithm for the separation of skill and working style. Psychology Science, 4, 433–450. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, K. , Kubinger, K. D. (2001). Herkömmliche Persönlichkeitsfragebogen und Objektive Persönlichkeitstests im “Wettstreit” um Unverfälschbarkeit [Personality questionnaires and objective personality tests in contest: More or less fakeable?] Report Psychologie, 26, 298–304. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W. , Gawronski, B. , Gschwendner, T. , Le, H. , Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385. doi: 10.1177/0146167205275613 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W. , Gschwendner, T. , Nosek, B. , Schmitt, M. (2006). What moderates implicit-explicit consistency? European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 335–390. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W. , Schmitt, M. (2008). Advances and challenges in the indirect measurement of individual differences at age 10 of the implicit association test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 207–209. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.207 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Hundleby, J. D. , Pawlik, K. , Cattell, R. B. (1965). Personality factors in objective test devices. San Diego, CA: Knapp. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jasper, F. , Ortner, T. M. (2014). The tendency to fall for distracting information while making judgments – development and validation of the Objective Heuristic Thinking Test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 30, 193–207. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000214 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Koch, T. , Ortner, T. M. , Eid, M. , Caspers, J. , & Schmitt, M. (2014). Evaluating the construct validity of objective personality tests using a Multitrait-Multimethod-Multioccasion (MTMM-MO) approach. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 208–230. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000212 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kubinger, K. D. (2009). The technique of objective personality-tests sensu R. B. Cattell nowadays: The Viennese pool of computerized tests aimed at experiment-based assessment of behavior. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41, 1024–1036. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kubinger, K. D. , Ebenhöh, J. (1996). Arbeitshaltungen – Kurze Testbatterie: Anspruchsniveau, Frustrationstoleranz, Leistungsmotivation, Impulsivität/Reflexivität [Working Style – A short test-battery: Level of aspiration, achievement motivation, frustration tolerance, impulsiveness/reflexiveness][Software and Manual]. Frankfurt/M.: Swets Test Services. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lejuez, C. W. , Aklin, W. M. , Jones, H. A. , Richards, J. B. , Strong, D. R. , Kahler, C. W. , Read, J. P. (2003). The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 26–33. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.11.1.26 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lejuez, C. W. , Aklin, W. M. , Zvolensky, M. J. , Pedulla, C. M. (2003). Evaluation of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviors. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 475–479. doi: 10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00036-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lejuez, C. W. , Read, J. P. , Kahler, C. W. , Richards, J. B. , Ramsey, S. E. , Stuart, G. L. , … Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology–Applied, 8, 75–84. doi: 10.1037//1076-898x.8.2.75 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lejuez, C. W. , Richards, J. B. , Read, J. P. , Kahler, C. W. , Ramsey, S. E. , Stuart, G. L. , … Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology – Applied, 8, 75–84. doi: 10.1037//1076-898X.8.2.75 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, G. J. , Kurtz, J. E. (2006). Advancing personality assessment terminology: Time to retire “objective” and “projective” as personality test descriptors. [Editorial Material]. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 223–225. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8703_01 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. (2007). Implicit-explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 65–69. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ortner, T. M. (2012). Teachers’ burnout is related to lowered speed and lowered quality for demanding short-term tasks. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54, 20–35. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ortner, T. M. , Horn, R. , Kersting, M. , Krumm, S. , Kubinger, K. D. , Proyer, R. T. , … Westhoff, K. (2007). Standortbestimmung und Zukunft Objektiver Persönlichkeitstests [Current Situation and Future of Objective Personality Tests]. Report Psychologie, 75. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ortner, T. M. , Kubinger, K. D. , Schrott, A. , Radinger, R. , Litzenberger, M. (2006). Belastbarkeits-Assessment: Computerisierte Objektive Persönlichkeits-Testbatterie – Deutsch (BAcO-D) [Stress resistance assessment: Computerized objective test-battery – German version]. Test: Software und Manual Frankfurt/M.: Harcourt Assessment. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ortner, T. M. , Proyer, R. T. , Kubinger, K. D. (2006). Theorie und Praxis Objektiver Persönlichkeitstests [Theory and praxis of objective personality tests]. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pawlik, K. (2006). Objektive Tests in der Persönlichkeitsforschung [Objective personality tests in personality research]. In T. M. Ortner, R. T. Proyer, K. D. Kubinger, (Eds.), Theorie und Praxis Objektiver Persönlichkeitstests [Theory and practice of objective personality tests] (pp. 16–23). Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Payne, B. K. , Cheng, C. M. , Govorun, O. , Steward, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poorthuis, A. M. G. , Thomaes, S. , Denissen, J. A. A. , de Castro, B. O. , van Aken, M. A. G. (2014). Personality in action: Can brief behavioral personality tests predict children’s academic and social adjustment across the transition to secondary school? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 169–177. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000186 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R. T. (2007). Convergence of conventional and behavior-based measures: Towards a multimethod approach in the assessment of vocational interests. Psychology Science Quarterly, 49, 168–183. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R. T. , Häusler, J. (2007). Assessing behavior in standardized settings: The role of objective personality tests. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 537–546. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R. T. , Häusler, J. (2008). Multimethodische Objektive Interessentestbatterie (MOI) [Multi-methodic objective test battery]. Mödling, Austria: Schuhfried. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Quirin, M. , & Bode, R. C. (2014). Submerging the surface of conscious emotions: Using the IPANAT to measure implicit trait and state affect. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 231–237. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000190 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rubio, V. J. , Hernández, J. M. , Zaldivar, F. , Marquez, O. , Santacreu, J. (2010). Can we predict risk-taking behavior? Two behavioral tests for predicting guessing tendencies in a multiple-choice test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 87–94. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000013 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Santacreu, J. , Rubio, V. J. , Hernández, J. M. (2006). The objective assessment of personality: Cattells’s T-data revisited and more. Psychology Science, 48, 53–68. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt-Atzert, L. (2007). Objektiver Leistungsmotivations Test (OLMT) [Objective Achievement Motivation Test] [Software and Manual]. Mödling, Austria: Dr. G. Schuhfried GmbH. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, L. R. (1975). Objektive Persönlichkeitsmessung in diagnostischer und klinischer Psychologie [Objective Measurement of Personality in Assesssment and Clinical Psychology]. Weinheim: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. (2006). Conceptual, theoretical, and historical foundations of multimethod assessment. In M. Eid, E. Diener, (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 9–25). New York, NY: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. (2009a). Moderated consistency between direct, indirect, and behavioral indicators of dispositions Retrieved from www.uni-landau.de/schmittmanfred/english/forschung/IAT/index.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. (2009b). Person x situation-interactions as moderators. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 267. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. , Baumert, A. (2010). On the diversity of dynamic person x situation interactions. European Journal of Personality, 24, 497–500. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. , Gollwitzer, M. , Baumert, A. , Blum, G. , Geschwendner, T. , Hofmann, W. , Rothmund, T. (2013). Proposal of a nonlinear interaction of person and situation (NIPS) model. Frontiers in Psychology in Personality Science and Individual Differences, 4, 499. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. , Hofmann, W. , Gschwendner, T. , Gerstenberg, F. X. , Zinkernagel, A. (in press). A model of moderated convergence between direct, indirect, and behavioral measures of personality traits. In A. J. R. Van de Vijver, T. M. Ortner, (Eds.), Behavior Based Assessment: Going beyond Self Report in the Personality, Affective, Motivation, and Social Domains. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steyer, R. , Schmitt, M. , Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389–408. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strack, F. , & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, T. D. , Lindsey, S. , Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, M. , Schmidt-Atzert, L. , Bühner, M. , Krumm, S. (2007). Fakability of different measurement methods for achievement motivation: Questionnaire, semi-projective, and objective. Psychology Science, 49, 291–307. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, M. , Schmukle, S. C. , Egloff, B. , & Bühner, M. (2010). Investigating Measures of Achievement Motivation(s). Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 15–21. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar