Abstract
Abstract. We developed a new instrument designed to measure fear of intimacy in romantic relationships. We suggest assessing fear of intimacy through two dimensions: self-revelation and dependence. The Fear of Intimacy Components Questionnaire (FICQ) was validated across three studies in which a 10-item solution systematically emerged. Consistently with a two component perspective, a two-factor solution fitted data the best: fear of losing the self (FLS) and fear of losing the other (FLO). Qualitative analyses verified content validity. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses tested the factor structure. Multigroup analyses supported the structural invariance across gender, age, and relationship status. Both factors showed adequate discriminant validity and internal consistency, and good 3-week period test-retest reliability. Associations between the FICQ and insecure attachment orientations demonstrated convergent validity. The association between the FICQ and relationship satisfaction above and beyond a preexisting measure offered criterion validity. By going beyond traditional self-revelation-focused conception of fear of intimacy, that is, by proposing a bi-dimensional structure to fear of intimacy, we believe that this new measure will contribute to future research on fear of intimacy.
References
(2006). Impediments to intimacy. Clinical Social Work Journal, 34, 559–572.
(2009). Intimacy status, attachment, separation-individuation patterns, and identity status in female university students. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 697–712.
(2010). Does identity precede intimacy? Testing Erikson’s theory on romantic development in emerging adults of the 21st century. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25, 387–415.
(1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
(1969). Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
(1998).
Self-report measures of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview . In J. A. SimpsonW. S. RholesEds., Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.(2007). Perceptions of risk in intimacy in dating couples: Conversation and relationship quality. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 92–119.
(2004). Body image in an inter-personal context: Adult attachment, fear of intimacy and social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 89–103.
(1991). Development and validation of a fear-of intimacy scale. Psychological Assessment, 3, 218–225.
(1963). Childhood and society. New York, NY: Norton.
(2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354.
(1990).
Toward a behavioral conceptualization of adult intimacy: Implications for marital therapy . In E. A. BlechmanEd., Emotions and the family (pp. 117–136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.(1971). Using tests in counseling. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
(1984).
The dangers of intimacy . In V. DerlagaEd., Communication, intimacy and close relationships (pp. 207–220). New York, NY: Praeger.(1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.
(2003). How close are we? Measuring intimacy and examining gender differences. Journal of Counseling & Development, 81, 462–472.
(2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.
(2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2001). Post-divorce conflict and avoidance of intimacy. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 35, 93–105.
(1991). Intimidade: O outro espaço da afectividade
[Intimacy: Another field of affectivity] . Lisboa, Portugal: Difusão Cultural.(1988). Perceptions of risk in intimacy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 503–508.
(2001). Too close for comfort: Exploring the risks of intimacy. Boston, MA: Perseus.
(2002). In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and social Psychology Bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1629–1646.
(2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.
(2007). The experiences in close relationship scale (ECR) – short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204.
(1994). A process model of adult attachment formation. In S. DuckEd., Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions. New York, NY: Wiley.
