Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Brief Report

Tests of Scholastic Aptitude Cover Reasoning Facets Sufficiently

Published Online:May 21, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000247

Abstract

Abstract. This study explores how reasoning facets relate to tests of scholastic aptitude and to academic performance. Intelligence test scores and academic aptitude test scores from freshman students in science (n = 284) and economics (n = 359) as well as subsequent grades from their first year in college were used to analyze structural equation models. The direct influence of reasoning facets on academic performance is fully mediated by academic aptitude test scores. Numeric abilities dominate the aptitude tests’ predictive power. Verbal reasoning explains a significant amount of aptitude test score variance in science but not in economics. The mediation analysis suggests that verbal, numeric, and figural reasoning are covered sufficiently by the aptitude tests.

References

  • ACT. (2014). Newsroom: Other frequently asked questions about the ACT. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/newsroom/factsheets/view.php?p=160 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Atkinson, R. C. & Geiser, S. (2009). Reflections on a century of college admissions tests. Educational Researcher, 38, 665–676. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09351981 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Berry, C. M. & Sackett, P. R. (2009). Individual differences in course choice result in underestimation of the validity of college admissions systems. Psychological Science, 20, 822–830. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02368.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bucik, V. & Neubauer, A. C. (1996). Bimodality in the Berlin model of intelligence structure (BIS): A replication study. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 987–1005. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00129-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Coyle, T. R. & Pillow, D. R. (2008). SAT and ACT predict college GPA after removing g. Intelligence, 36, 719–729. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2008.05.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fischer, F., Schult, J. & Hell, B. (2013). Sex differences in secondary school success: Why female students perform better. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 529–543. doi: 10.1007/s10212-012-0127-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fischer, F., Schult, J. & Hell, B. (2015). Unterschätzung der Studienleistungen von Frauen durch Studierfähigkeitstests: Erklärbar durch Persönlichkeitseigenschaften? [Underestimation of women’s college grades by college admission tests: Explainable by personality traits?]. Diagnostica, 61, 34–46. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924/a000120 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Frey, M. C. & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15, 373–378. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00687.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jackson, D. N. & Rushton, J. P. (2006). Males have greater g: Sex differences in general mental ability from 100,000 17- to 18-year-olds on the Scholastic Assessment Test. Intelligence, 34, 479–486. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2006.03.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hell, B., Trapmann, S. & Schuler, H. (2007). Eine Metaanalyse der Validität von fachspezifischen Studierfähigkeitstests im deutschsprachigen Raum [A meta-analysis of the validity of subject-specific scholastic aptitude tests in German speaking countries]. Empirische Pädagogik, 21, 251–270. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Koenig, K. A., Frey, M. C. & Detterman, D. K. (2008). ACT and general cognitive ability. Intelligence, 36, 153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2007.03.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Liepmann, D., Beauducel, A., Brocke, B. & Amthauer, R. (2007). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R [Intelligence-Structure-Test] (2nd ed.). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Patterson, F. & Ferguson, E. (2010). Selection for medical education and training. In T. SwanwickEd., Understanding medical education: Evidence, theory and practice (pp. 352–365). West Sussex, UK: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pösse, B. (2004). SFBT Naturwissenschaften. Handanweisung [Subject-specific counseling test series science. Manual]. Nürnberg, Germany: Bundesagentur für Arbeit. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sander, N. & Yousfi, S. (2013). SFBT Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Handanweisung [Subject-specific counseling test series economics. Manual]. Nürnberg, Germany: Bundesagentur für Arbeit. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar