Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

The Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of Positive and Negative Affect

A Study in Iran and the USA

Published Online:May 21, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000252

Abstract

Abstract. This study investigated the factor structure and measurement invariance of the Mroczek and Kolarz’s scales of positive and negative affect in Iran (N = 2,391) and the USA (N = 2,154), and across gender groups. The two-factor model of affect was supported across the groups. The results of measurement invariance testing confirmed full metric and partial scalar invariance of the scales across cultural groups, and full metric and full scalar invariance across gender groups. The results of latent mean analysis revealed that Iranians scored lower on positive affect and higher on negative affect than Americans. The analyses also showed that American men scored significantly lower than American women on negative affect. The significance and implications of the results are discussed.

References

  • Bakhshi, A., Daemi, F. & Ajilchi, B. (2009). Psychometric properties of the positive and negative affect scales in an Iranian sample. Journal of Iranian Psychologists, 20, 343–350 [in Persian]. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Busseri, M. A. & Sadava, S. W. (2011). A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 290–314. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J. & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1005–1017. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Diener, E., Oishi, S. & Ryan, K. (2013). Universal and cultural differences in the causes and structure of “happiness” – a multilevel review. In C. KeyesEd., Mental well-being: International contributions to the study of positive mental health (pp. 153–176). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Diener, E. & Suh, E. (1999). National differences in subjective well-being. In D. KahnemanE. DienerN. SchwarzEds., Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 434–452). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Diener, E., Tay, L. & Myers, D. G. (2011). The religion paradox: If religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1278–1290. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eid, M. & Diener, E. (2001). Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: Inter-and intranational differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 869–885. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fischer, A. H. & Manstead, A. S. R. (2000). The relation between gender and emotions in different cultures. In A. H. FischerEd., Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 71–94). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Good, M. J. & Good, B. J. (1988). Ritual, the state, and the transformation of emotional discourse in Iranian society. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry, 12, 43–63. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Joshanloo, M. (2013a). A comparison of western and Islamic conceptions of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1857–1874. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Joshanloo, M. (2013b). Mental well-being in Iran: The importance of comprehensive well-being in understanding the linkages of personality and values. In Corey. L. KeyesEd., Mental well-being: International contributions to the study of subjective well-being and positive mental health (pp. 177–207). New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Joshanloo, M. & Ghaedi, G. (2009). Value priorities as predictors of hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 294–298. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Joshanloo, M. & Weijers, D. (2014). Aversion to happiness across cultures: A review of where and why people are averse to happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 717–735. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Joshanloo, M. (2011). Investigation of the contribution of spirituality and religiousness to hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in Iranian young adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 915–930. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D. & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kim-Prieto, C. & Diener, E. (2009). Religion as a source of variation in the experience of positive and negative emotions. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 447–460. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kuppens, P., Ceulemans, E., Timmerman, M. E., Diener, E. & Kim-Prieto, C. (2006). Universal intracultural and intercultural dimensions of the recalled frequency of emotional experience. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 491–515. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lischetzke, T., Eid, M. & Diener, E. (2012). Perceiving one’s own and others’ feelings around the world: The relations of attention to and clarity of feelings with subjective well-being across nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 1249–1267. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mesquita, B. & Albert, D. (2007). The cultural regulation of emotions. In J. J. GrossEd., The handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 486–503). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Minkov, M. (2009). Predictors of differences in subjective well-being across 97 nations. Cross-Cultural Research, 43, 152–179. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morris, S. (2012). The science of happiness: A cross-cultural perspective. In H. SelinG. DaveyEds., Happiness across cultures (Vol. 6, pp. 435–450). Amsterdam: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mroczek, D. K. & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333–1349. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S. & Rusting, C. L. (2003). Gender differences in well-being. In D. KahnemanE. DienerN. SchwarzEds., Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 330–350). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ryff, C., et al. (2012). National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS II), 2004-2006. ICPSR04652-v6. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/landing.jsp. doi :10.3886/ICPSR04652.v6 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. In M. EidR. J. LarsenEds., The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steinmetz, H. (2011). Estimation and comparison of latent means across cultures. In E. DavidovP. SchmidtJ. BillietEds., Cross-Cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications (pp. 85–116). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tay, L. & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 354–365. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 227–242. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2012). Statistics of the human development report. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Walen, H. R. & Lachman, M. E. (2000). Social support and strain from partner, family, and friends: Costs and benefits for men and women in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 5–30. doi: 10.1177/0265407500171001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A. & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watts, F. N. (1996). Psychological and religious perspectives on emotion. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 6, 71–87. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar