Skip to main content
Original Article

Proposal for a Version of MWMS Across Mediterranean Countries

A Validation Study in Greece, Italy, and Spain

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000277

Abstract. Self-determination theory introduces a multidimensional view of motivation and explains how the different types of motivation can be promoted or hindered. Following Gagné et al. (2014), the purpose of this study was to create an abbreviated version of the Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale (MWMS) and to study the psychometric properties of the instrument using data from 1,035 workers from three Mediterranean countries (Greece, Italy, and Spain). Factorial analyses indicated that the 18-item scale has the same factor structure across the three Mediterranean languages, reflecting common cultural idiosyncrasies and influences. Convergent and discriminant validity indicated that intrinsic and integrated forms of autonomous motivation had a positive relationship with job satisfaction, affective and normative commitment, prosocial behavior, perceived organizational support, job autonomy, and leader-member exchange. Controlled forms of motivation (e.g., social and material) were unrelated or negatively related to most of the variables examined, with the exception of continuance commitment (positive association). Lastly, amotivation was negatively related to all employee-related variables, except for continuance commitment. Practical implications and suggestions for the development of future research based on self-determination theory are discussed.

References

  • Assor, A., Vansteenkiste, M. & Kaplan, A. (2009). Identified versus introjected approach and introjected avoidance motivations in school and in sports: The limited benefits of self-worth strivings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 482–497. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Battistelli, A., Galletta, M., Portoghese, I., Pohl, S. & Odoardi, C. (2013). Promoting organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of intrinsic work motivation. Travail Humain, 76, 205–226. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Battistelli, A., Galletta, M., Portoghese, I. & Vandenberghe, C. (2013). Mindsets of commitment and motivation: Interrelationships and contribution to work outcomes. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 147, 17–48. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. TriandisJ. W. BerryEds., Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (1994). Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 289–311. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 272–300. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872–882. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H. & West, S. G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 471–492. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L., Gagné, M., Ryan, R. M., Leone, D. L., Usunov, J. & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930–942. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R. & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14–23. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fernandez, S. (2013). Employee empowerment and job satisfaction in the US. Federal bureaucracy: A self-determination theory perspective. The American Review of Public Administration. doi: 10.1177/0275074013507478 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fernet, C., Senécal, C., Guay, F., Marsh, H. & Dowson, M. (2008). The work tasks motivation scale for teachers (WTMST). Journal of Career Assessment, 16, 256–279. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gagné, M. & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M.-H., Aubé, C., Morin, E. & Malorni, A. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 628–646. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., … Wang, Z. (2012). Validation evidence in ten languages for the revised motivation at work scale, Paper presented at the IWP International Conference, Sheffield, UK. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., … Westbye, C. (2014). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 178–196. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gagné, M., Sénécal, C. & Koestner, R. (1997). Proximal job characteristics, feelings of empowerment, and intrinsic motivation: A multidimensional model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1222–1240. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Galletta, M., Battistelli, A. & Portoghese, I. (2011). Validazione della scala di motivazione al lavoro (MAWS) nel contesto italiano: evidenza di un modello a tre fattori [Validation of the Motivation at Work Scale (MAWS) in the Italian context: Evidence for the three-factor model]. Risorsa Uomo: Rivista di Psicologia del Lavoro e dell’Organizzazione, 16, 201–217. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Galletta, M., Portoghese, I. & Battistelli, A. (2011). Intrinsic motivation, job autonomy and turnover intention in the Italian healthcare: The mediating role of affective commitment. Journal of Management Research, 3, 1–19. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graen, G. B. & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graves, L. M. & Luciano, M. M. (2013). Self-determination at work: Understanding the role of leader-member exchange. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 518–536. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gupta, N. & Shaw, J. D. (2014). Employee compensation: The neglected area of HRM research. Human Resource Management Review, 24, 1–4. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R. & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS® System for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institutte, Inc. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. R. & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238–247. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G. & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structural modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McNeely, B. L. & Meglino, B. M. (1994). The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 836–844. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E. & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 991–1007. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Milfont, T. L. & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 111–121. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mitchell, J. I., Gagné, M., Beaudry, A. & Dyer, L. (2012). The role of perceived organizational support, distributive justice and motivation in reactions to new information technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 729–738. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morgeson, F. P. & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321–1339. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Ryan, R. M., Chirkov, V. I., Kim, Y., Wu, C., … Sun, Z. (2004). Self-concordance and subjective well-being in four cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 209–223. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M. & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102–111. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spector, P. (1997). Job Satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes and consequences. California: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stajkovic, A. D. & Luthans, F. (1997). A meta-analysis of the effects of organizational behaviour modification on task performance, 1975–1995. Academy of Management Journal, 5, 1122–1149. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T. & Shapiro, D. L. (2004). The future of work motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 29, 379–387. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tabachnik, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2006). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Taylor, S., Pelletier, L. G. & Villeneuve, M. (2009). Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: Its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 41, 213–226. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tucker, L. R. & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 271–360). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar