Abstract
Abstract. Most evidence available has found multidimensional solutions for the General Health Questionnaire’s (GHQ12) structure, contrary to the authors’ original one-factor solution. Recently, the study of method effects associated to negatively worded items has been included in the study of GHQ12’s factor structure, and the most common conclusion has been that the best-fitting structure is a single factor confounded by response bias. Current study analyzes the factor structure of the Portuguese version of the GHQ12. The sample consisted of 1,332 young Angolan adults. Previously-reported structures, including one-factor and multidimensional substantive ones, as well as bifactor structures, and models positing method effects among negatively worded items were tested via Confirmatory Factor Analyses. Results suggested that a three substantive factor solution adequately represented the scale’s underlying structure. The emerging factors were dysphoria, social dysfunction, and loss of confidence. Method effects did not play a clear role in explaining the multidimensionality observed in the factor structures tested for the GHQ12.
References
2006). Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff’s psychological well-being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 76. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-76
(1989). The General Health Questionnaire: A psychometric analysis using latent trait theory. Psychological Medicine, 19, 469–485.
(2011). Validity of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in detecting depressive and anxiety disorders among high school students. Psychiatry Research, 187, 291–296.
(1980). The use of the General Health Questionnaire as an indicator of mental health in occupational studies. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 187–194.
(2007). A confirmatory factor analysis of the GHQ12 using a large scale Australian sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 2–8.
(2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the GHQ-12: Can I see that again? The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 37, 475–483.
(1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
(2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 189–225.
(2002). A confirmatory factor analysis of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire among older people. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 739–744.
(2013). The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants. BMC Public Health, 13, 128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-128
(2001). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Arabic version of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 89, 85–94.
(2003). Factor structure of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire in the Japanese general adult population. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 57, 379–383.
(1998). The mental health of hospital nurses in Tasmania as measured by the 12-item General health Questionnaire. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28, 707–712.
(2013). Factorial Validity and Invariance of the GHQ-12 among Clinical and Nonclinical Samples. Assessment, 20, 219–229.
(2004). Measurement invariance in the General Health Questionnaire-12 in young Australian adolescents. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 1–7.
(1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
(1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
(2003). A utilização do QSG-12 na População Geral: Estudo de sua Validade de Construto
([The use of the GHQ-12 in a general population: A study of its construct validity] . Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 19, 241–248.1991). Multidimensional properties of the General Health Questionnaire. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 26, 132–138.
(2008). The factor structure of the twelve item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): The result of negative phrasing? Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 4, 10. doi: 10.1186/1745-0179-4-10
(2003). Wording effects in self-esteem scales: Methodological artefact or response style? Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 435–455.
(1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
(2010). The accuracy of HADS and GHQ-12 in detecting psychiatric morbidity in breast cancer patients. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 21, 1–10.
(2006). The factor structure and factorial invariance of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) across time: Evidence from two community-based samples. Psychological Assessment, 18, 444–451.
(2011). Estimating the prevalence of anxiety and mood disorders in an adolescent general population: An evaluation of the GHQ12. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 9, 410–420.
(1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810–819.
(1999). Assessing the multidimensionality of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 84, 927–935.
(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
(2012). Confirmatory factor analysis of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in Spanish adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 21, 1291–1298.
(1994). Reliability and validity and factor structure of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire among young males in Italy. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 90, 432–437.
(1995).
(Bayesian model selection in social research . In P. V. MarsdenEd., Sociological Methodology (pp. 111–196). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667–696. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
(2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559.
(2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research, 16, 19–31.
(2011). Propiedades psicométricas y valores normativos del General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) en población general española.
([Psychometric properties and normative values of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in Spanish general population] International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11, 125–139.2013). What is the General Health Questionnaire-12 assessing? Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the General Health Questionnaire-12 in a large scale German population sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 54, 406–413.
(2002). Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 1103–1119.
(2009). Factor structure and internal consistency of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and the Subjective Vitality Scale (VS), and the relationship between them: A study from France. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 22. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-22
(2008). The 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): Reliability, external validity and factor structure in the Spanish population. Psicothema, 20, 839–843.
(1999). Psychometric properties of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in a German primary care sample. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 100, 432–437.
(2005). Alternative factor models and factorial invariance of the GHQ-12: A large sample analysis using confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Assessment, 17, 231–236.
(2010). A Rasch and confirmatory factor analysis of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 45. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-45
(2013). The factor structure of the GHQ-12: The interaction between item phrasing, variance and levels of distress. Quality of Life Research, 22, 145–152. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0133-7
(2006). An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being: Method, mode, and measurement effects. Social Science Research, 35, 1080–1102.
(2006). Bad news indeed for Ryff’s six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 1120–1131.
(2013). Factor structure of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 748–764.
(1999). Rosenberg’s self-steem scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 84–98.
(2013). Explaining method effects associated with negatively worded items in trait and state global and domain-specific self-esteem scales. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 299–313. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2013.769394
(2005). The construct validity of Ryff’s scale of psychological well-being and its extension with spiritual well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 629–644.
(2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804.
(2001). Factorial structure of Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale among crack-cocaine drug users. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 275–286.
(2011). Wording effects and the dimensionality of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1056–1061.
(2000). The stability of the factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 30, 823–829.
(1989). The General Health Questionnaire: Reliability and validity for Australian youth. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 23, 53–58.
(2009). Factor structure of the general health questionnaire (GHQ-12): The role of wording effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 197–201.
(