Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Multistudy Report

Approach and Avoidance Temperament

An Examination of Its Construct and Predictive Validity at Work

Published Online:October 30, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000285

Abstract

Abstract. In four studies, we investigated the factorial structure and the construct and predictive validity of the approach-avoidance temperament questionnaire (ATQ; Elliot & Thrash, 2010) for attitudes and behavior at work. In Study 1 (N = 395 university students), we showed that a Dutch translation of the ATQ can be best described by a two-factorial structure. In Study 2 (N = 295 senior-year students), we documented approach and avoidance temperament as predictor of students’ career adaptability and engagement. In Study 3 (N = 103 employees), we demonstrated that approach and avoidance temperament have incremental predictive validity for work engagement beyond goal orientation (three-dimensional model). In Study 4 (N = 93 employees), approach temperament was positively related to peer ratings of job performance, independent of achievement goals (four-dimensional model). Overall, we showed that individual differences in terms of a predisposition for the orientation and reaction to positive/negative stimuli across situations can be used to increase our understanding of behavior at work. Our results support the practical utility of approach and avoidance temperament for work settings.

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). Amos™ 18 User’s Guide. Crawfordsville, IN: Amos Development Corp. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W. & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779–806. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B. & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development Journal, 13, 209–223. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B. & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job Demands-Resources Theory. In P. Y. ChenC. L. CooperEds., Work and Wellbeing: Wellbeing: A complete reference guide (Vol. 3, pp. 37–64). Chichester, UK: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K. & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the New Millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bipp, T. & Demerouti, E. (in press). Which employees craft their jobs and how? Basic dimensions of personality and employees’ job crafting behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/joop.12089 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. SchmittW. C. BormanEds., Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Corr, P. J., DeYoung, C. G. & McNaughton, N. (2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 158–175. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1998). Six approaches to the explanation of facet-level traits: Examples from conscientiousness. European Journal of Personality, 12, 117–134. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeShon, R. P. & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1096–1127. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J. & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K. & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632–648. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J. & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J. & Thrash, T. M. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 78, 865–906. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ferris, D. L., Rosen, C. C., Johnson, R. E., Brown, D. J., Risavy, S. D. & Heller, D. (2011). Approach or avoidance (or both?): Integrating core self-evaluations within an approach/avoidance-framework. Personnel Psychology, 64, 137–161. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gorman, C. A., Meriac, J. P., Overstreet, B. L., Apodaca, S., McIntyre, A. L., Park, P. & Godbey, J. N. (2012). A meta-analysis of the regulatory focus nomological network: Work-related antecedents and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 160–172. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hansen, J. C., Sullivan, B. A. & Luciana, M. (2011). A social neuroscientific model of vocational behavior. Journal of Career Assessment, 19, 216–227. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. W. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johnson, R. E., Chang, C. H., Meyer, T., Lanaj, K. & Way, J. (2013). Approaching success or avoiding failure? Approach and avoidance motives in the work domain. European Journal of Personality, 27, 424–441. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Langelaan, S., Bakker, A. B., Van Doornen, L. J. P. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference? Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 521–532. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miron, E., Erez, M. & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 175–199. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roskes, M., Elliot, A. J., Nijstad, B. A. & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2013). Time pressure undermines performance under avoidance than approach motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 803–813. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rossier, J., Zecca, G., Stauffer, S. D., Maggiori, C. & Dauwalder, J. P. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale in a French-speaking Swiss sample: Psychometric properties and relationships to personality and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 734–743. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Savickas, M. L. & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 661–673. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire – a cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518–528. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B. & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 173–186. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Dam, K. & Menting, L. (2012). The role of approach and avoidance motives for unemployed job search behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 108–117. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995–1015. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Vianen, A. E. M., Klehe, U. C., Koen, J. & Dries, N. (2012). Career adaptability scale – Netherlands form: Psychometric properties and relationships to ability, personality, and regulatory focus. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 716–724. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Construction and validation of the Dutch goal orientation questionnaire [in Dutch]. Gedrag & Organisatie, 17, 387–401. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wallace, C. & Chen, G. (2006). A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation, and performance. Personnel Psychology, 59, 529–557. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wallace, J. C., Johnson, P. D. & Frazier, M. L. (2009). An examination of the factorial, construct, and predictive validity and utility of the regulatory focus at work scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 805–831. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A. & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Williams, L. J. & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar