Abstract
Abstract. Grid-based measures, where item stems are rated across diverse domains or subjects, represent an economic measure to assess multifaceted constructs such as academic self-concept. Although testing for measurement invariance between groups (e.g., based on gender or age) and within subjects over time (e.g., in longitudinal research) is common practice, research on invariance across domains is still lacking. We examine measurement invariance across selected self-concept domains in the Differentiated School Self-Concept (DISC) Grid as an example of grid-based self-concept measures. Using a highly diverse student sample, we assessed invariance of the DISC grid across three academic domains (German, English, and mathematics). Based on adequate model fit within each domain, the DISC grid proved to be strictly invariant across the three subject-specific self-concepts (German, English, and mathematics). Implications for theory (e.g., Möller and Marsh’s Dimensional Comparison Theory), empirical research (e.g., on the Internal/External Frame of Reference model), assessment (e.g., regarding other measures using similarly worded items across domains, such as the Self-Description Questionnaires [SDQ]), and practice (e.g., academic counseling) are discussed.
References
1977). Temporal comparison theory. Psychological Review, 84, 485–503. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.6.485
(2007). Sensitivity of goodness-of-fit indicators to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
(2012). Longitudinal invariance of measurement and structure of global self-concept: A population-based study examining trajectories among adolescents with and without chronic illness. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 38, 425–437. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jss112
(2011). Datenanalyse mit Mplus
([Data analysis with Mplus] (2nd corrected ed.). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129–149. doi: 10.3102/00028312023001129
(1992a). Self Description Questionnaire I: SDQ I. A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept. An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, Australia: University of Western Sydney.
(1992b). Self-Description Questionnaire (SDQ) III: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of late adolescent self-concept: A test manual and a research monograph. Macarthur, Australia: University of Western Sydney.
(1999). Self Description Questionnaire II: SDQ II. Macarthur, NSW, Australia: University of Western Sydney.
(2014). Dimensional comparison theory: An extension of the internal/external frame of reference effect on academic self-concept formation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 326–341. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.003
(2013).
(Academic self-concept . In J. HattieE. M. AndermanEds., International guide to student achievement (pp. 62–63). New York, NY: Routledge.2013). Dimensional comparison theory. Psychological Review, 120, 544–560. doi: 10.1037/a0032459
(1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
(2007). DISK-Gitter mit SKSLF-8. Differentielles Schulisches Selbstkonzept-Gitter mit Skala zur Erfassung des Selbstkonzepts schulischer Leistungen und Fähigkeiten (Manual)
([DISC grid with SKSLF-8, Differentiated School Self-Concept grid including academic and ability self-concept sclaes] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.2004). Wie generell ist das Modell? Analysen zum Geltungsbereich des “Internal/External Frame of Reference”-Modells
([How general is the model? Analyzing the applicability of the Internal/External Frame of Reference model to more than two school subjects] . Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 18, 221–230. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.18.4.2212006). Facetten schulischen Selbstkonzepts. Welchen Unterschied macht das Geschlecht?
([Gender differences in subject-specific academic self-concepts] . Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20, 9–18. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.20.1.92006). Blocked versus randomized format of questionnaires: A confirmatory multigroup analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 961–974. doi: 10.1177/0013164405285906
(1995). Assessment of self-concept. ERIC digest. Retrieved from http://www.ericdigests.org/1996-3/self.htm
(2004). The relations between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A systematic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111–133. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3902
(