Skip to main content
Original Article

A Cross-National Study on the Psychometric Quality of the Italian Version of the Dutch Work Addiction Scale (DUWAS)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000300

Abstract. We investigated the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Dutch Work Addiction Scale (DUWAS) by using an Italian sample (N = 1,027) and a comparable Dutch sample (N = 7,523). We first conducted multigroup confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis. We then examined the correlations of the DUWAS with job demands, work-family conflict, job-related affective well-being, and psychological and physical strain. Results showed that a two-factor solution of the DUWAS was equivalent across the Italian and Dutch samples, with data supporting factor variance and covariance equivalence in addition to metric equivalence. Internal consistencies of the DUWAS and its subscales were adequate, and test-retest reliability showed a strong stability of the measure at one year. The DUWAS and its subscales showed a pattern of correlations in the expected direction with the adopted criterion measures. Overall, the Italian version of the DUWAS shows adequate validity and reliability.

References

  • Balducci, C., Cecchin, M., Fraccaroli, F. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Exploring the relationship between workaholism and workplace aggressive behaviour: The role of job-related emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 629–634. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W. (2008). Testing equivalence in the structure, means, and variances of higher order constructs with structural equation modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 593–613. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, M. A., Michel, J. S., Zhdanova, L., Pui, S. Y. & Baltes, B. B. (2015). All work and no play? A meta-analytic examination of the correlates and outcomes of workaholism. Journal of Management. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0149206314522301 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • del Líbano, M., Llorens, S., Salanova, M. & Schaufeli, W. (2010). Validity of a brief workaholism scale. Psicothema, 22, 143–150. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T. & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Maudsley monograph N. 21. London, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Grzywacz, J. G., Frone, M. R., Brewer, C. S. & Kovner, C. T. (2006). Quantifying work-family conflict among registered nurses. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 414–426. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guglielmi, D., Simbula, S., Schaufeli, W. & Depolo, M. (2012). Self-efficacy and workaholism as initiators of the job demands-resources model. Career Development International, 17, 375–389. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Iacobucci, D. & Duhachek, A. (2003). Advancing alpha: Measuring reliability with confidence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 478–487. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karasek, R., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., Bongers, P. & Amick, B. (1998). The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 322–355. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Littman-Ovadia, H., Balducci, C. & Ben-Moshe, T. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Hebrew version of the Dutch Work Addiction Scale (DUWAS-10). The Journal of Psychology, 148, 327–346. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C. & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, B. E. (1999). The work addiction risk test: Development of a tentative measure of workaholism. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 199–210. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., van der Heijden, F. M. M. A. & Prins, J. T. (2009). Workaholism, burnout, and well-being among junior doctors: The mediating role of role conflict. Work & Stress, 23, 155–172. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A. & Taris, T. W. (2009). Being driven to work excessively hard: The evaluation of a two-factor measure of workaholism in the Netherlands and Japan. Cross-Cultural Research, 43, 320–348. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W. & Bakker, A. B. (2008). It takes two to tango: Workaholism is working excessively and working compulsively. In R. J. BurkeC. L. CooperEds., The long work hours culture: Causes, consequences and choices (pp. 203–225). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schweizer, K. (2010). Some guidelines concerning the modeling of traits and abilities in test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 1–2. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B. & Taris, T. (2010). How does workaholism affect worker health and performance? The mediating role of coping. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17, 154–160. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spence, J. T. & Robbins, A. S. (1992). Workaholics: Definition, measurement, and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 160–178. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van den Broeck, A., Schreurs, B., De Witte, H., Vansteenkiste, M., Germeys, F. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). Understanding Workaholics’ Motivations: A self-determination perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 60, 600–621. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vanderberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Katwyk, P. T., Fox, S., Spector, P. E. & Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Using the Job-related Affective Well-being Scale (JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 219–230. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar