Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Construct Validity of the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI)

An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Published Online:April 22, 2016https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000316

Abstract

Abstract. Despite the wide use of the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI), its construct validity is still an issue of debate. Whereas previous studies primarily have relied on confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs), the present study aimed to evaluate the Norwegian 22-item version of the ECBI intensity scale using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), which offers more flexibility compared to traditional CFA. The study used data from three samples of parents with children with emerging or existing problem behaviors. Results showed that the ESEM model showed good fit and identified the three factors Oppositional defiant behavior, Conduct problem behavior, and Inattentive behavior. In addition, the ESEM approach revealed several small and significant (λ ≤ .21) cross-loadings. The results illustrated the strengths of ESEM over CFA and suggest that ESEM provide a useful statistical framework to evaluate the structure of ECBI items.

References

  • Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Axberg, U., Hanse, J. J. & Broberg, A. (2008). Parents’ description of conduct problems in their children: A test of the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) in a Swedish sample aged 3–10. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 497–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00670.x. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Burns, G. L. & Patterson, D. R. (1990). Conduct problem behaviors in a stratified random sample of children and adolescents: New standardization data on the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2 (4), 391. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Burns, G. L. & Patterson, D. R. (1991). Factor structure of the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory: Unidimensional or multidimensional measure of disruptive behavior? Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20, 439–444. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Burns, G. L. & Patterson, D. R. (2000). Factor structure of the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory: A parent rating scale of oppositional defiant behavior toward adults, inattentive behavior, and conduct problem behavior. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 569–577. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP2904_9. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Burns, G., Patterson, D. R., Nussbaum, B. R. & Parker, C. M. (1991). Disruptive behaviors in an outpatient pediatric population: Additional standardization data on the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 202–207. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.3.2.202. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Butler, A. M. (2010). Cross-racial measurement equivalence of the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory Factors among young African American and European American children. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 70, 7844. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cole, D. A., Truglio, R. & Peeke, L. (1997). Relation between symptoms of anxiety and depression in children: A Multitrait-Multimethod-Multigroup Assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 110–119. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eyberg, S. M. (1992). Assessing therapy outcome with preschool-children – Progress and problems. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 21, 306–311. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eyberg, S. M. & Robinson, E. A. (1983). Conduct problem behavior: Standardization of a behavioural rating scale with adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 12, 347–354. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eyberg, S. M. & Ross, A. W. (1978). Assessment of child-behavior problems – Validation of a New Inventory. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 7, 113–116. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Furr, M. (2011). Scale Construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. London, UK: The SAGE Library of Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 11, 1337–1345. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kjøbli, J., Hukkelberg, S. & Ogden, T. (2013). A randomized trial of group parent training: Reducing child conduct problems in real-world settings. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51, 113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.11.006. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kjøbli, J. & Ogden, T. (2012). A randomized effectiveness trial of brief parent training in primary care settings. Prevention Science, 13, 616–626. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0289-y. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kjøbli, J. & Ogden, T. (2014). A randomized effectiveness trial of individual child social skills training: Six-month follow-up. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 8, 31. doi: 10.1186/s13034-014-0031-6. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S. & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439–476. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D. & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Life-course-persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial behavior. In D. CicchettiD. J. CohenEds., Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder and adaptation (2 ed.., pp. 570–598). Mahwah, NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, B. O. & Muthén, L. K. (1998–2011). Mplus Software (Version 6.11). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus user's guide, (4th ed.) Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2008). Mplus User’s Guide, (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Myers, K. & Winters, N. C. (2002). Ten-year review of rating scales. I: overview of scale functioning, psychometric properties, and selection. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41 (2), 114–122. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reedtz, C., Bertelsen, B., Lurie, J. I. M., Handegard, B. H., Clifford, G. & Morch, W. T. (2008). Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI): Norwegian norms to identify conduct problems in children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 31–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00621.x. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reedtz, C., Handegård, B. H. & Morch, W. T. (2010). Promoting positive parenting practices in primary pare: Outcomes and mechanisms of change in a randomized controlled risk reduction trial. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 131–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00854.x. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Robinson, E. A., Eyberg, S. M. & Ross, A. (1980). The standardization of an inventory of child conduct problem behaviors. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 9, 22–29. doi: 10.1080/15374418009532938. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Solholm, R., Kjøbli, J. & Christiansen, T. (2013). Early initiatives for children at risk – development of a program for the prevention and treatment of behavior Problems in primary services. Prevention Science, 14 (6), 535–544. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Statistics Norway (2012). Inntekt for par med barn og enslige forsørgere, [Incomes for couples with children and single parents] Retrieved from http://statbank.ssb.no/statistikkbanken First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weis, R., Lovejoy, M. & Lundahl, B. W. (2005). Factor structure and discriminative validity of the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory with young children. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27, 269–278. doi: 10.1007/s10862-005-2407-7. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Werba, B. E. (2003). Standardization and cross-cultural validity of the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory with Australian preschoolers. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 63, 43–91. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar