Are Workaholism and Work Engagement in the Eye of the Beholder?
A Multirater Perspective on Different Forms of Working Hard
Abstract
Abstract. Virtually all studies on workaholism and engagement – two forms of heavy work investment – rely on self-part questionnaires. However, the limitations of self-reports are widely acknowledged and in their final sections, papers on workaholism and engagement typically lament the use of such measures. Investigating data other than respondents’ self-reports, such as peer ratings, may overcome these limitations. Using a sample of 73 dyads composed of focal workers and their colleagues, the present study aimed: (1) to compare focal workers’ and coworkers’ perceptions concerning their levels of work engagement and workaholism; and (2) to explore the discriminant validity of engagement and workaholism. A multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix and a correlated trait-correlated method model, the CT-C(M-1) model, were examined. Our results showed a considerable agreement between both raters (i.e., focal workers and coworkers) in levels of engagement and workaholism. In contrast to previous findings, a significant difference between raters on the cognitive dimension of workaholism (i.e., working compulsively) was observed. Moreover, our results provided further evidence for the discriminant validity between the two forms of heavy work investment.
References
2005). Amos 6.0 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
(2011). “Workaholism” and potential outcomes in well-being and health in a cross-occupational sample. Stress and Health, 27, e209–e214. doi: 10.1002/smi.1366.
(2006). A cluster analysis investigation of workaholism as a syndrome. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 52–62. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.11.1.52.
(2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 4–28. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2010.485352.
(2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 189–206. doi: 10.1348/096317909X402596.
(2009). The crossover of work engagement between working couples: A closer look at the role of empathy. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 220–236. doi: 10.1108/02683940910939313.
(2013). Workaholism and daily recovery: A day reconstruction study of leisure activities. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 87–107. doi: 10.1002/job.1796.
(2006). Crossover of burnout and engagement in work teams. Work and Occupations, 33, 464–489. doi: 10.1177/0730888406291310.
(2009). The crossover of daily work engagement: Test of an actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1562–1571. doi: 10.1037/a0017525.
(2010). Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES-9): A cross-cultural analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 143–149. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000020.
(1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.
(2007). Workaholic behaviors: Do colleagues agree? International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 312–320. doi: 10.1037/1072-5245.14.3.312.
(1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016.
(2002). Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 245–260. doi: 10.1023/A:1019637632584.
(1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 170–177. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170.
(2003). Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models: A multiple-indicator CT-C(M-1) model. Psychological Methods, 8, 38–60. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.1.38.
(2010).
(Passion for work: Work engagement versus workaholism . In S.L. AlbrechtEd., Handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 264–271). Glos, UK: Edward Elgar.2012). Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 141, 415–424.
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
(2011). Association between workaholism and sleeping problems among hospital nurses. Industrial Health, 48, 864–871.
(2004). The impact of workaholism on personal relationships. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 32, 171–186. doi: 10.1080/03069880410001697729.
(2012). Workaholism: Definitions, measures, and dynamics, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Torino, Torino, Italia
(2006).
(Understanding workaholism: The case of behavioral tendencies . In R.J. BurkeEd., Research companion to working time and work addiction (pp. 108–128). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.2007). Dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of workaholism: A conceptual integration and extension. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 111–136. doi: 10.1002/job.424.
(1967). Psychometric theory, (1st ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
(1994). Psychometric theory, (3rd ed.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
(2009). A CTC(M-1) model for different types of raters. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 5, 88–98. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.5.3.88.
(1971). Confessions of a workaholic. New York, NY: World.
(1996). Organizational impact of workaholism: Suggestions for researching the negative outcomes of excessive work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 70–84. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.70.
(2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293–315. doi: 10.1002/job.248.
(2006). The measurement of work engagement with a Short Questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282471.
(2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 893–917. doi: 10.1002/job.595.
(2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326.
(2009). Being driven to work excessively hard: The evaluation of a two-factor measure of workaholism in the Netherlands and Japan. Cross-Cultural Research, 43, 320–348. doi: 10.1177/1069397109337239.
(2008).
(It takes two to tango: Workaholism is working excessively and working compulsively . In R. J. BurkeC. L. CooperEds., The long work hours culture: Causes, consequences and choices (pp. 203–226). Bingley, UK: Emerald.2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 173–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00285.x.
(2012). Do workaholism and work engagement predict employee well-being and performance in opposite directions? Industrial Health, 50, 316–321. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.MS1355.
(1992). Workaholism: Definition, measurement, and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 160–178. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5801_15.
(2012). For fun, love, or money: What drives workaholic, engaged, and burned-out employees at work? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61, 30–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00454.x.
(2011). Workaholic and work engaged employees: Dead ringers or worlds apart? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 468–482. doi: 10.1037/a0024392.
(2001). Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations, 54, 717–752. doi: 10.1177/00187267015460.
(