Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

The Multiple Faces of Risk-Taking

Scoring Alternatives for the Balloon-Analogue Risk Task

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000335

Abstract. The Balloon-Analogue Risk Task (BART; Lejuez et al., 2002) is one of the most popular behavioral tasks suggested to assess risk-taking in the laboratory. Previous research has shown that the conventionally computed score is predictive, but neglects available information in the data. We suggest a number of alternative scores that are motivated by theories of risk-taking and that exploit more of the available data. These scores can be grouped around (1) risk-taking, (2) task performance, (3) impulsive decision making, and (4) reinforcement sequence modulation. Their theoretical rationale is detailed and their validity is tested within the nomological network of risk-taking, deviance, and scholastic achievement. Two multivariate studies were conducted with youths (n = 435) and with adolescents/young adults (n = 316). Additionally, we tested formal models suggested for the BART that decompose observed behavior into a set of meaningful parameters. A simulation study with parameter recovery was conducted, and the data from the two studies were reanalyzed using the models. Most scores were reliable and differentially predictive of criterion variables and may be used in basic research. However, task specificity and the generally moderate validity do not warrant use of the experimental paradigm for diagnostic purposes.

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Oxford, UK: Holt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Appelt, K. C., Milch, K. F., Handgraaf, M. J. & Weber, E. U. (2011). The decision making individual differences inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 252–262. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ashenhurst, J. R., Bujarski, S., Jentsch, J. & Ray, L. A. (2014). Modeling behavioral reactivity to losses and rewards on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART): Moderation by alcohol problem severity. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 22, 298–306. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Battin-Pearson, S., Newcomb, M. D., Abbott, R. D., Hill, K. G., Catalano, R. F. & Hawkins, J. (2000). Predictors of early high school dropout: A test of five theories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 568–582. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beauducel, A., Strobel, A. & Brocke, B. (2003). Psychometric properties and norms of a German version of the Sensation Seeking Scales, Form V. Diagnostica, 49, 61–72. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293–1295. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Busemeyer, J. R. & Stout, J. C. (2002). A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. Psychological Assessment, 14, 253–262. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C. S. (2005). Impulse and constraint: Perspectives from personality psychology, convergence with theory in other areas, and potential for integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 312–333. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C. S. & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Casey, B., Getz, S. & Galvan, A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Developmental Review, 28, 62–77. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. (1958). A need for alertness to multivariate experimental findings in integrative surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 253–256. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. (2008). Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1596–1603. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K. & Groom, C. J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469–487. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O. & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corr, P. J. (2008). Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST): Introduction. In P. J. CorrEd., The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 1–43). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; US. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cyders, M. A. & Coskunpinar, A. (2011). Measurement of constructs using self-report and behavioral lab tasks: Is there overlap in nomothetic span and construct representation for impulsivity? Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 965–982. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cyders, M. A. & Coskunpinar, A. (2012). The relationship between self-report and lab task conceptualizations of impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 121–124. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dawe, S. & Loxton, N. J. (2004). The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 343–351. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeYoung, C. G. (2011). Impulsivity as a personality trait. In K. D. VohsR. F. BaumeisterEds., Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 485–502). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dick, D. M., Smith, G., Olausson, P., Mitchell, S. H., Leeman, R. F., O’Malley, S. S. et al. (2010). Understanding the construct of impulsivity and its relationship to alcohol use disorders. Addiction Biology, 15, 217–226. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Essex, B. G., Lejuez, C. W., Qian, R. Y., Bernstein, K. & Zald, D. H. (2011). The Balloon Analog Insurance Task (BAIT): A behavioral measure of protective risk management. PLoS One, 6, e21448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021448 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Friedman, N. P. & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. & De Houwer, J. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In H.T.J. ReisM. CharlesEds., Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gladwin, T. E., Figner, B., Crone, E. A. & Wiers, R. W. (2011). Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 364–376. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gottfredson, M. R. (2011). In pursuit of a General Theory of Crime. In F. T. CullenC. LeroA. J. MyerF. AdlerEds., The origins of American criminology (pp. 333–346). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gottfredson, M. R. & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gray, J. A. & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An inquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Harden, K. & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2011). Individual differences in the development of sensation seeking and impulsivity during adolescence: Further evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 47, 739–746. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heyn, S., Baumert, J. & Köller, O. (1994). Kieler Lernstrategien-Inventar (KSI) [Kiel learning strategy inventory]. Kiel, Germany: Institut für Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Nosek, B. A. & Schmitt, M. (2005). What moderates implicit-explicit consistency? European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 335–390. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Honaker, J., King, G. & Blackwell, M. (2011). Amelia II: A program for missing data. Journal of Statistical Software, 45, 1–47. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jäger, A. O., Süß, H.-M. & Beauducel, A. (1997). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-Test. BIS-Test, Form 4. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, J., Tellis, G. J. & Macinnis, D. J. (2005). Losers, winners, and biased trades. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 324–329. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kail, R. (1991). Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 490–501. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kirby, K. N., Winston, G. C. & Santiesteban, M. (2005). Impatience and grades: Delay-discount rates correlate negatively with college GPA. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 213–222. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klauer, K. C., Schmitz, F., Teige-Mocigemba, S. & Voss, A. (2010). Understanding the role of executive control in the implicit association test: Why flexible people have small IAT effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 595–619. doi: 10.1080/17470210903076826 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F. & Teige-Mocigemba, S. (2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 353–368. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.353 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Knyazev, G. G. (2004). Behavioural activation as predictor of substance use: Mediating and moderating role of attitudes and social relationships. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 75, 309–321. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kubinger, K. D. (2009). The technique of objective personality-tests sensu R. B. Cattell nowadays: The Viennese pool of computerized tests aimed at experiment-based assessment of behavior. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41, 1024–1036. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lauriola, M., Panno, A., Levin, I. P. & Lejuez, C. W. (2014). Individual differences in risky decision making: A meta-analysis of sensation seeking and impulsivity with the balloon analogue risk task. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27, 20–36. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1784 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leigh, B. C. (1999). Peril, chance, adventure: Concepts of risk, alcohol use and risky behavior in young adults. Addiction, 94, 371–383. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lejuez, C., Aklin, W. M., Zvolensky, M. J. & Pedulla, C. M. (2003). Evaluation of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviours. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 475–479. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lejuez, C., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., … Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75–84. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K. & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285–300. doi: 10.1037/a0033266 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores (with contributions by Allan Birnbaum). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J. & Von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right-Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18, 257–284. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Millisecond Software (2012, June). Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Retrieved June 16, 2012, from http://www.millisecond.com/download/library/BART/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mohammed, S. & Schwall, A. (2009). Individual differences and decision making: What we know and where we go from here. In G. P. F. HodgkinsonEd., International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24 (pp. 249–312). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Newcomb, M. D., Abbott, R. D., Catalano, R. F., Hawkins, J., Battin-Pearson, S. & Hill, K. (2002). Mediational and deviance theories of late high school failure: Process roles of structural strains, academic competence, and general versus specific problem behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 172–186. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ortner, T. M., Proyer, R. T. & Kubinger, K. D. (2006). Theorie und Praxis Objektiver Persönlichkeitstests [Theory and application of objective persoanliyt tests]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, J. D. A., Summerfeldt, L. J., Hogan, M. J. & Majeski, S. A. (2004). Emotional intelligence and academic success: examining the transition from high school to university. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 163–172. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00076-X First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338. doi: 10.1037/a0014996 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Revelle, W. (2015). psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research (Version 1.5.1.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reynolds, B., Ortengren, A., Richards, J. B. & de Wit, H. (2006). Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 305–315. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.024 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reynolds, B., Penfold, R. B. & Patak, M. (2008). Dimensions of impulsive behavior in adolescents: Laboratory behavioral assessments. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16, 124–131. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Suess, H.-M. & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414–429. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitz, F., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Voss, A. & Klauer, K. C. (2013). When scoring algorithms matter: Effects of working memory load on different IAT scores. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 103–121. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02057 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schonberg, T., Fox, C. R. & Poldrack, R. A. (2011). Mind the gap: Bridging economic and naturalistic risk-taking with cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 11–19. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simons, J. S., Dvorak, R. D. & Batien, B. D. (2008). Methamphetamine use in a rural college population: Associations with marijuana use, sensitivity to punishment, and sensitivity to reward. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 444–449. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simons, J. S., Gaher, R. M., Correia, C. J., Hansen, C. L. & Christopher, M. S. (2005). An affective-motivational model of marijuana and alcohol problems among college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 326–334. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spreng, R. A. (1994). A reassessment of the reliability of difference scores in the measurement of disconfirmation of expectations. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior, 7, 114–118. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stahl, C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., Nuszbaum, M., Tüscher, O., Lieb, K., Klauer, K. C. & (2014). Behavioral components of impulsivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 850–886. doi: 10.1037/a0033981 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steinberg, L. (2010). A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Psychobiology, 52, 216–224. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stout, J. C., Busemeyer, J. R., Lin, A., Grant, S. J. & Bonson, K. R. (2004). Cognitive modeling analysis of decision-making processes in cocaine abusers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 742–747. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strack, F. & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strobel, A., Beauducel, A., Debener, S. & Brocke, B. (2001). A German version of Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 216–227. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • The MathWorks (2014). MATLAB. Natick, MA: The MathWorks. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Torrubia, R., Avila, C. & Caseras, X. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity scales. In P. J. CorrEd., The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 188–227). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Torrubia, R., Avila, C., Molto, J. & Caseras, X. (2001). The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 837–862. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Townsend, L., Flisher, A. J., Gilreath, T. & King, G. (2006). A systematic literature review of tobacco use among adults 15 years and older in sub-Saharan Africa. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 84, 14–27. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Townsend, L., Flisher, A. J. & King, G. (2007). A systematic review of the relationship between high school dropout and substance use. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 10, 295–372. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect-theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ulrich, M., Keller, J., Hoenig, K., Waller, C. & Gron, G. (2014). Neural correlates of experimentally induced flow experiences. NeuroImage, 86, 194–202. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Ravenzwaaij, D., Dutilh, G. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Cognitive model decomposition of the BART: Assessment and application. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 94–105. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wallsten, T. S., Pleskac, T. J. & Lejuez, C. (2005). Modeling behavior in a clinically diagnostic sequential risk-taking task. Psychological Review, 112, 862–880. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R. & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263–290. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whiteside, S. P. & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wild, K. P. & Schiefele, U. (1994). Lernstrategien im Studium: Ergebnisse zur Faktorenstruktur und Reliabilität eines neuen Fragebogens [Learning strategies in the studies: Results concerning factor structure and reliability of a new questionnaire]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15, 185–200. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wilhelm, O., Hildebrandt, A. & Oberauer, K. (2013). What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 433. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00433 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Xu, S., Korczykowski, M., Zhu, S. & Rao, H. (2013). Risk-taking and impulsive behaviors: A comparative assessment of three tasks. Social Behavior and Personality, 41, 477–486. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yechiam, E., Busemeyer, J. R., Stout, J. C. & Bechara, A. (2005). Using cognitive models to map relations between neuropsychological disorders and human decision-making deficits. Psychological Science, 16, 973–978. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zuckerman, M. (1996). Item revisions in the Sensation Seeking Scale Form V (SSS-V). [Comment/Reply]. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 515. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zuckerman, M. (2008). Personality and sensation seeking. In G. J. BoyleG. MatthewsD. H. SaklofskeEds., The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Personality theories and models (Vol. 1, pp. 379–398). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zuckerman, M. & Kuhlman, D. (2000). Personality and risk-taking: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68, 999–1029. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar