Are Three Items Sufficient to Measure Sense of Coherence?
Evidence From Nonclinical and Clinical Samples
Abstract
Abstract. The present study aimed at evaluating if the three-item sense of coherence (SOC) scale developed by Lundberg and Nystrom Peck (1995) can be effectively used for research purpose in both nonclinical and clinical samples. To provide evidence that it represents adequately the measured construct we tested its validity in a nonclinical (N = 658) and clinical sample (N = 764 patients with cancer). Results obtained in the nonclinical sample attested a positive relation of SOC – as measured by the three-item SOC scale – with Antonovsky’s 13-item and 29-item SOC scales (convergent validity), and with dispositional optimism, sense of mastery, anxiety, and depression symptoms (concurrent validity). Results obtained in the clinical sample confirmed the criterion validity of the scale attesting the positive role of SOC – as measured by the three-item SOC scale – on the person’s capacity to respond to illness and treatment. The current study provides evidence that the three-item SOC scale is a valid, low-loading, and time-saving instrument for research purposes on large sample.
References
1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
(1993). The structure and properties of the Sense of Coherence Scale. Social Science & Medicine, 36, 725–733.
(1996). The sense of coherence: An historical and future perspective. Journal of Medical Science, 32, 170–178.
(1986). The development of a sense of coherence and its impact on responses to stress situations. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 213–225.
(2005). Fear of recurrence, sense of coherence and posttraumatic stress disorder in haematological cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 14, 510–515.
(2014). Use and perceived benefits of complementary therapies by cancer patients receiving conventional treatment in Italy. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 47, 26–34.
(2012). The dimensionality of Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scales. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Psychology, TPM, 19, 115–134. doi: 10.4473/TPM19.2.4
(1989). Trait-anxiety and sense of coherence: A longitudinal study. Psychological Reports, 65, 221–222.
(1992). The role of optimism and sense of coherence in predicting recovery following surgery. Psychology and Health, 7, 301–310.
(2013). The Accuracy of the Life Orientation Test–Revised (LOT–R) in measuring dispositional optimism: Evidence from item response theory analyses. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 523–529. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.781029
(1966). A short clinical diagnostic self-rating scale for psychoneurotic patients: The Middlesex Hospital Questionnaire (MHQ). The British Journal of Psychiatry, 112, 917–923.
(2005). Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 59, 460–466.
(2006). Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 376–381.
(1998). The structure of Antonovsky’s Orientation to Life Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 505–516.
(2005). Sense of coherence, coping and quality of life following a critical illness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49, 173–181.
(1993). Psychometric evaluation of Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 145–153.
(2010). Sense of coherence, health and lifestyle in middle-aged women. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:326065/FULLTEXT01.pdf
(2007). Sense of coherence and distress in cancer patients and their partners. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 1100–1110.
(2005).
(Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures . In R. K. HambletonP. F. MerendaC. D. SpielbergerEds., Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-cultural Assessment (pp. 3–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.2005). Sense of coherence and biomarkers of health in 43-year-old women. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12, 98–102.
(1997). Childhood conditions, sense of coherence, social class and adult ill health: Exploring their theoretical and empirical relations. Social Science & Medicine, 44, 821–831.
(1995). A simplified way of measuring sense of coherence Experiences from a population survey in Sweden. The European Journal of Public Health, 5, 56–59.
(2012). Components and determinants of quality of life in community-dwelling older adults. European Journal of Ageing, 9, 255–263.
(1996). Assessing psychological distress in cancer patients: Validation of a self-administered questionnaire. Oncology, 53, 295–302.
(2009). Do different scales measure the same construct? Three sense of coherence scales. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 63, 66–167.
(1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 19, 2–21.
(2009). Education as related to job satisfaction and health. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:222667/FULLTEXT01.pdf
(2014). Can’t we make it any shorter? The limits of personality assessment and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 212–220.
(2005). Sense of coherence as a moderator of the effects of stressful life events on health. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 59, 979–984.
(1998). The factor structure of Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scale in Swedish clinical and nonclinical samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 701–711.
(2013). Relationship of sense of coherence to stressful events, coping strategies, health status, and quality of life in women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 22, 20–27.
(1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.
(2003). Measuring sense of coherence with only three items: A useful tool for population surveys. British Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 409–421.
(2011). Some thoughts concerning the recent shift from measures with many items to measures with few items. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 71–72.
(2000). On the sins of short form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102–111.
(2014). A weak sense of coherence is associated with a higher mortality risk. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 68, 411–417. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203085
(2006). Resilience, misfortune, and mortality: Evidence that sense of coherence is a marker of social stress adaptive capacity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 61, 221–227.
(2003). Sense of coherence and mortality in men and women in the EPIC-Norfolk United Kingdom prospective cohort study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158, 1202–1209.
(2014). Short scales – five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 185–189. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000148
(2007). Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence in psychosomatic patients – a contribution to construct validation. GMS Psycho-Social Medicine, 4, 1–9.
(1992). Contributo alla taratura italiana del Middlesex Hospital Questionnaire (MHQ): dati statistici da un campione di 303 adulti normali
([A contribution to the Italian calibration of the Middlesex Hospital Questionnaire (MHQ): Statistical data from a sample of 303 normal adults] . Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 202–203, 23–29.