Development of an Inventory Assessing Social and Emotional Skills in Brazilian Youth
Abstract
Abstract. Whereas the structure of individual differences in personal attributes is well understood in adults, much less work has been done in children and adolescents. On the assessment side, numerous instruments are in use for children but they measure discordant attributes, ranging from one single factor (self-esteem; grit) to three factors (social, emotional, and academic self-efficacy) to five factors (strength and difficulties; Big Five traits). To construct a comprehensive measure for large-scale studies in Brazilian schools, we selected the eight most promising instruments and studied their structure at the item level (Study 1; N = 3,023). The resulting six-factor structure captures the major domains of child differences represented in these instruments and resembles the well-known Big Five personality dimensions plus a negative self-evaluation factor. In a large representative sample in Rio de Janeiro State (Study 2; N = 24,605), we tested a self-report inventory (SENNA1.0) assessing these six dimensions of socio-emotional skills with less than 100 items and found a robust and replicable structure and measurement invariance across grades, demonstrating feasibility for large-scale assessments across diverse student groups in Brazil. Discussion focuses on the contribution to socio-emotional research in education and its measurement as well as on limitations and suggestions for future research.
References
(2011).
Personality psychology and economics . In E. HanushekS. MachinL. WoessmanEds., Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 4, pp. 1–181). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.(2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 645–664.
(2012). Adaptação e validação de instrumentos psicológicos entre culturas: algumas considerações
[Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Psychological Instruments: Some Considerations] . Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 22, 423–432. doi: 10.1590/S0103-863X2012000300014(1992). A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
(2014). Advancements in the field of personality development. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 763–769. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.04.009
(2015). Employability in the 21st Century: Complex (Interactive) Problem Solving and Other Essential Skills. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 276–281. doi: 10.1017/iop.2015.33
(2014). A Roadmap for Further Progress in Research on Personality Development. European Journal of Personality, 28, 213–215. doi: 10.1002/per.1967
(2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166–174.
(2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
(1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.
(2014, September). An integrative framework for the assessment of social-emotional skills, Lecture presented at the Institute Ayrton Senna, Sao Paulo.
(1991). The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California.
(2008).
Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues . In O. P. JohnR. W. RobinsL. A. PervinEds., Handbook of Personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.(2003). The core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00152.x
(2009). Empirical identification of the major facets of conscientiousness. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 451–458. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.03.007
(2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471.
(1995). The validity of the Big-5 as a model for teachers ratings of individual-differences among children aged 4–12 years. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 525–534.
(2001). A brief questionnaire for measuring self-efficacy in youths. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23, 145–149.
(2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
(1973). A locus of control scale for children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40, 148–154. doi: 10.1037/h0033978
. (2015). Draft proposal: OECD Longitudinal Study of Skills Development in Cities. Paris, France: OECD.
(2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338. doi: 10.1037/a0014996
(1979). Conceiving the Self. New York, NY: Basic Books.
(2005). crossdes: A package for design and randomization in crossover studies. Rnews, 5, 24–27.
(2011). The socio-economic importance of personality characteristics, Retrieved from http://educacaosec21.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/The-socio-economic-importance-of-personality-characteristics.pdf
(2014). Social and emotional development and school earning: a measurment proposal in support of public policy. São Paulo, Brazil: Ayrton Senna Institute.
(2014). Traits in transition: The structure of parent-reported personality traits from early childhood to early adulthood. Journal of Personality, 82, 182–199. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12044
(2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 330–348.
(2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1041–1053.
(1987). Reexamining basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors, Paper presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
(2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
