Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

The Factorial Structure of a 15-Item Version of the Italian Empathy Quotient Scale

Published Online:August 03, 2016https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000348

Abstract

Abstract. The Empathy Quotient (EQ) scale is a self-report measure designed to assess empathy in adults. Although the scale is widely used and has been validated into different languages, its dimensionality is still controversial, as well as it is not clear which scale version should be considered. The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the EQ scale. The Italian version of the EQ scale was administered to a sample of 633 adults. Results showed that the 15-item EQ scale version proposed by Muncer and Ling (2006) had excellent reliability and validity indices, with a gender invariant three-factor structure (Cognitive Empathy, Emotional Reactivity, and Social Skills) and a higher order factor of general empathy. The overall results confirmed that the 15-item EQ scale is an eligible and stable tool for the assessment of empathy.

References

  • Allison, C., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. J., Stone, M. H. & Muncer, S. J. (2011). Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient (EQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 829–835. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Angst, J., Adolfsson, R., Benazzi, F., Gamma, A., Hantouche, E., Meyer, T. D., … Scott, J. (2005). The HCL-32: Towards a self-assessment tool for hypomanic symptoms in outpatients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 88, 217–233. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J. & Parker, J. D. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatics Research, 38, 33–40. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). Zero degrees of empathy: A new theory of human cruelty. London, UK: Allen Lane. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baron-Cohen, S. & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning autism and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Berthoz, S., Wessa, M., Kedia, G., Wicker, B. & Grèzes, J. (2008). Cross-cultural validation of the empathy quotient in a French-speaking sample. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 469–477. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dimitrijević, A., Hanak, N., Vukosavljević-Gvozden, T. & Opačić, G. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Serbian version of the Empathy Quotient (S-EQ). Psihologija, 45, 257–276. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M. & Bruno, D. Z. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17, 1–13. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Groen, Y., Fuermaier, A. B. M., Den Heijer, A. E., Tucha, O. & Althaus, M. (2015). The empathy and systemizing quotient: The psychometric properties of the Dutch version and a review of the cross-cultural stability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 2848–2864. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2448-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hommel, G. (1988). A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika, 75, 383–386. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kim, J. & Lee, S. J. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Empathy Quotient Scale. Psychiatry Investigation, 7, 24–30. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klein, K. J. K. & Hodges, S. D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 720–730. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S. & David, A. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34, 911–924. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muncer, S. J. & Ling, J. (2006). Psychometric analysis of the empathy quotient (EQ) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1111–1119. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, B. & Kaplan, D. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor-analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 19–30. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Preti, A., Vellante, M., Baron-Cohen, S., Zucca, G., Petretto, D. R. & Masala, C. (2011). The empathy quotient: A cross-cultural comparison of the Italian version. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 16, 50–70. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Revelle, W. (2015). psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychVersion=1.5.8 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Senese, V. P., Bornstein, M. H., Haynes, O. M., Rossi, G. & Venuti, P. (2012). A cross-cultural comparison of mothers’ beliefs about their parenting very young children. Infant Behavior and Development, 35, 479–488. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Senese, V. P., Ruotolo, F., Ruggiero, G. & Iachini, T. (2012). The Italian version of the Weinstein Noise Sensitivity Scale: Measurement invariance across age, gender, and context. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 118–124. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Thissen, D., Steinberg, L. & Gerrard, M. (1986). Beyond group-mean differences: The concept of item bias. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 118–128. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vellante, M., Baron-Cohen, S., Melis, M., Marrone, M., Petretto, D. R., Masala, C. & Preti, A. (2013). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test: Systematic review of psychometric properties and a validation study in Italy. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 18, 326–354. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Goldenfeld, N., Delaney, J., Fine, D., … Weil, L. (2006). Development of short forms of the Empathy Quotient (EQShort) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ-Short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 929–940. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar