An Initial Investigation of the Use of Comparative Referents to Assess Social Anxiety
Abstract
Abstract. The current study examined the validity of two self-report measures of social anxiety constructed using social comparative referent points. It was hypothesized that these comparison measures would be both reliable and valid. Results indicated that two different comparative versions – one invoking injunctive norms and another invoking descriptive norms – showed good reliability, excellent internal consistency, and acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. The comparative measures also predicted positive functioning, some aspects of social quality of life, and social anxiety as measured by an independent self-report. These findings suggest that adding a comparative reference point to instructions on social anxiety measures may aid in the assessment of social anxiety.
References
2005). Assessment of adult psychopathology: Meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant correlations. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 361–382. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.361
(2002). The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale as a self-report instrument: A preliminary psychometric analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 701–715. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00060-2
(1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897.
(1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
(1989). The Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory: Concurrent and external validity. Behavior Therapy, 20, 417–427. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(89)80060-7
(1998). Structural relationships among dimensions of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders and dimensions of negative affect, positive affect, and autonomic arousal. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 179–192. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.107.2.179
(1998).
(Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance . In D. T. GilbertS. T. FiskeG. LindzeyEds., The handbook of social psychology (Vols. 1 and 2, pp. 151–192) (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2014). Dimensional assessment of DSM-5 social anxiety symptoms among university students and its relationship with functional impairment. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 10, 1325–1332.
(2007). “If I’m better than average, then I’m ok?” Comparative information influences beliefs about risk and benefits. Patient Education and Counseling, 69, 140–144. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.008
(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. doi: 10.1177/001872675400700202
(2001). The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: A comparison of the psychometric properties of self-report and clinician-administered formats. Psychological Medicine, 31, 1025–1035. doi: 10.1017/S0033291701004056
(1994). Quality of life inventory manual and treatment guide. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson and Pearson Assessments.
(2011). Is it all relative? Comparative judgments and the possible improvement of self-ratings and ratings of others. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 48–60. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393521
(2005). Cognitive assessment of social anxiety: A comparison of self-report and thought listing methods. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 34, 3–15. doi: 10.1080/16506070410030106
(1997). Objective standards are not enough: Affective, self-evaluative, and behavioral responses to social comparison information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 763–774. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.763
(2002). Comparative risk estimates relative to the average peer predict behavioral intentions and concern about absolute risk. Risk, Decision & Policy, 7, 193–202. doi: 10.1017/S1357530902000613
(1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 141–173.
(2013). Am I abnormal? Relative rank and social norm effects in judgments of anxiety and depression symptom severity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 174–184. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1754
(2000). Quality of life in individuals with anxiety disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 669–682.
(2007). Not so above average after all: When people believe they are worse than average and its implications for theories of bias in social comparison. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 42–58. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.005
(2011). Is the Beck Anxiety Inventory a good tool to assess the severity of anxiety? A primary care study in the Netherlands study of depression and anxiety (NESDA) BMC Family Practice, 12, 1–6.
(2007). Relative versus absolute measures of explicit attitudes: Implications for predicting diverse attitude-relevant criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 907–926. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.907
(1996). Comparing correlated but nonoverlapping correlations. Psychological Methods, 1, 178–183. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.178
(2010). Are direct or indirect measures of comparative risk better predictors of concern and behavioural intentions? Psychology & Health, 25, 149–165. doi: 10.1080/08870440802340164
(2009). Screening for social anxiety disorder with the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Depression and Anxiety, 26, 34–38.
(2002). The effects of range restriction on estimates of criterion interrater reliability: Implications for validation research. Personnel Psychology, 55, 807–825. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00130.x
(1996). Quality of life in social phobia. Depression and Anxiety, 4, 126–133. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1996)4:3<126::AID-DA5>3.0.CO;2-E
(1999).
(Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications . In D. KahnemanE. DienerN. SchwarzEds., Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.1998). Comorbidity of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: An integrative review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1, 125–144. doi: 10.1023/A:1021887712873
(2000). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
(2007). Development and validation of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS). Psychological Assessment, 19, 253–268. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.253
(1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231–248. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.231
(