Pictorial Empathy Test (PET)
An Easy-to-Use Method for Assessing Affective Empathic Reactions
Abstract
Abstract. Research on empathy has increased rapidly during the last decades but brief assessment methods are not easily available. The aim was to develop a test for affective empathic reactions which would be simple to translate into different languages, easy to use in a variety of research settings, and which would catch the empathic reactions at the moment they arise. We describe the development and validation of the Pictorial Empathy Test (PET) in three studies (Study 1, N = 91; Study 2, N = 2,789; and Study 3, N = 114). The PET includes seven photographs about distressed individuals and the participants are asked to rate on a 5-point scale how emotionally moving they find the photograph. The results indicated that the PET displayed a unitary factor structure and it had high internal consistency and good seven-month test-retest reliability. In addition, the results supported convergent and discriminant validity of the test. The results suggest that the PET is a useful addition to the prevailing methods for assessing affective empathy.
References
2012). The psychopath magnetized: Insights from brain imaging. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.008
(2011). Emotional face recognition, EMG response, and medial prefrontal activity in empathic behaviour. Neuroscience Research, 71, 251–259. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2011.07.1833
(1999).
(The evolution of a theory of mind . In M. CorballisS. LeaEds., The descent of mind: Psychological perspectives on hominid evolution (pp. 261–277). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 248–254. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01904-6
(2005). Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Science, 310, 819–823. doi: 10.1126/science.1115455
(2004). The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175. doi: 10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
(2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00715
(2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
(1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
(2003). Facial expressions, their communicatory functions and neuro-cognitive substrates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 561–572. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1220
(2007a). The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in morality and psychopathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 387–392. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.003
(2007b).
(Empathic dysfunction in psychopathic individuals . In T. F. D. FarrowP. W. R. WoodruffEds., Empathy in mental illness (pp. 3–16). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.2001). A selective impairment in the processing of sad and fearful expressions in children with psychopathic tendencies. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 491–498. doi: 10.1023/A:1012225108281
(1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81. doi: 10.1037/h0046016
(2013). The Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form. Psychological Assessment, 25, 679–691. doi: 10.1037/a0032297
(2001). Parents’ judgments and students’ self-judgments of empathy: The structure of empathy and agreement of judgments based on the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 36–47. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.17.1.36
(1993). Multivariate group comparisons of variable systems: MANOVA and structural equation modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 174–184. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.174
(2003). Autistic traits in the general population: A twin study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 524–530. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.5.524
(2012). The balance between feeling and knowing: Affective and cognitive empathy are reflected in the brain’s intrinsic functional dynamics. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 727–737. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr051
(2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245–265. doi: 10.1348/0144665031752934
(1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–125. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
(2006).
(Empathy . In J. StetsJ. H. TurnerEds., Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 443–466). New York, NY: Springer.2013). An fMRI study of affective perspective taking in individuals with psychopathy: Imagining another in pain does not evoke empathy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7 Article 489, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00489
(2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3, 71–100. doi: 10.1177/1534582304267187
(2010). Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities: Neural correlates and gender differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35, 67–82. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.10.006
(2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
(2008). Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 464–473. doi: 10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x
(1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91
(1987). Universals and cultural differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 712–717. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.712
(2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685
(2011). Is there a core neural network in empathy? An fMRI based quantitative meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 903–911. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.009
(2014). Spontaneous versus deliberate vicarious representations: Different routes to empathy in psychopathy and autism. Brain, 137, e272. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt364
(2009). Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 1–25. doi: 10.1080/13546780903395748
(2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
(2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93
(1997).
(When women’s intuition isn’t greater than men’s . In W. IckesEd., Empathic accuracy (pp. 117–143). New York, NY: Guilford Press.2010). Double dissociation between cognitive and affective empathy in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Research, 175, 277–279. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.03.002
(2011). The construction and validation of an abridged version of the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ-Short). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 589–596. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1073-0
(2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00006
(2007). Empathy for positive and negative emotions in the gustatory cortex. Neuroimage, 34, 1744–1753. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.032
(2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 441–476. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2003.03.001
(2006a). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 589–611. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010
(2006b). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 540–550. doi: 10.1002/ab.20154
(1998). Is gender or gender-role orientation a better predictor of empathy in adolescence? Sex Roles, 39, 45–59. doi: 10.1023/A:1018825732154
(2011). Autistic symptomatology, face processing abilities, and eye fixation patterns. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 158–167. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1032-9
(2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259–289. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654
(2013). Understanding advanced theory of mind and empathy in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35, 655–668. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2013.809700
(2010). Neural basis of extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation. Neuroimage, 51, 1468–1475. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.025
(1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x
(2006). Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient (EQ) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1111–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.020
(2011). An experiential thinking style: Its facets and relations with objective and subjective criterion measures. Journal of Personality, 79, 1043–1080. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00718.x
(1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
(1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 33–60. doi: 10.1080/14792779108401856
(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
(2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1–20. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X02000018
(2011). The QCAE: A Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 84–95. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.528484
(2011). Lack of empathy in patients with narcissistic personality disorder. Psychiatry Research, 187, 241–247. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.09.013
(2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
(2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132, 617–627. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn279
(2009). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 62–71. doi: 10.1080/00223890802484381
(2012). The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 794–799. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.008
(2013). SPSS and SAS programs for comparing Pearson correlations and OLS regression coefficients. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 880–895. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0344-z
(