Self-Efficacy in Retrieving Positive Emotional Experience and Using Humor
A Validation Study of a New Instrument in Three Countries
Abstract
Abstract. Recent research has pointed to the benefits of positive emotions and their appropriate modulation in buffering the impact of negative experience, and in promoting well-being. Two studies examined the psychometric properties of a new scale that was designed to assess perceived self-efficacy in using memories of positive emotional experiences and humor to face challenges and to cope with stressful experiences. In the first study, we examined the factor structure and internal validity of two scales in youths from the United States (N = 1,277), Italy (N = 363), and Spain (N = 223). In the second study, we examined correlations of the two scales with positive affect, as well as other indicators of well-being and adjustment in the three countries (US: N = 499; Italian and Spanish samples of Study 1). The results of the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported two distinct factors and showed acceptable partial invariance of the scales across countries. Correlations supported the scales’ construct and discriminant validity. Overall, the findings corroborated the psychometric properties of the two scales and the view of retrieval of positive emotional experiences and humor as distinct self-regulatory strategies.
References
1994).
(The evaluation of structural equation models and hypothesis testing . In R. P. BagozziEd., Principles of marketing research (pp. 386–422). Malden, MA: Blackwell.1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
(2006).
(Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales . In F. PajaresT. UrdanEds., Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.2003). Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy in diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning. Child Development, 74, 769–782. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00567
(1987). Gender differences in perceived intimacy with different members of adolescents’ social networks. Sex Roles, 17, 689–718. doi: 10.1007/BF00287683
(1993).
(Alternative ways of assessing model fit . In K. A. BollenS. J. LongEds., Testing structural equation model (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.2003). Savoring Beliefs Inventory (SBI): A scale for measuring beliefs about savouring. Journal of Mental Health, 12, 175–196. doi: 10.1080/0963823031000103489
(2005). Using the past to enhance the present: Boosting happiness through positive reminiscence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 227–260. doi: 10.1007/s10902-005-3889-4
(1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre-and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the Friendship Qualities Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 471–484. doi: 10.1177/0265407594113011
(1994). Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 289–311. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2903_5
(2013). The longitudinal relations between self-esteem and affective self-regulatory efficacy. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 859–870. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.011
(2008). Assessing regulatory emotional self-efficacy in three countries. Psychological Assessment, 20, 227–237. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.3.227
(2013). Mastery of negative affect: A hierarchical model of emotional self-efficacy beliefs. Psychological Assessment, 25, 105–116. doi: 10.1037/a0029136
(2001).
(Affective perceived self-efficacy: The capacity to regulate negative affect and to express positive affect . In G. V. CapraraEd., Self-efficacy assessment (pp. 35–50). Trento, Italy: Edizioni Erickson.2010). Counteracting depression and delinquency in late adolescence: The role of regulatory emotional and interpersonal self-efficacy beliefs. European Psychologist, 15, 34–48. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000004
(2013). Emotional stability and affective self‐regulatory efficacy beliefs: Proofs of integration between trait theory and social cognitive theory. European Journal of Personality, 27, 145–154. doi: 10.1002/per.1847
(2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
(2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. The American Psychologist, 55, 647–654. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.647
(2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. The American Psychologist, 56, 218–226. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
(2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. The American Psychologist, 60, 678–686. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.678
(2000). The undoing effect of positive emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 24, 237–258. doi: 10.1023/A:1010796329158
(2013). Self-efficacy in regulating positive and negative emotions: A validation study in Germany. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 197–204. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000151
(1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 32, 179–185. doi: 10.1177/1094428104263675
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
(1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206–1217. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1206
(1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
(2012). Humor and resiliency: Towards a process model of coping and growth. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8, 475–491. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v8i3.464
(1993). Coping humor, stress, and cognitive appraisals. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 25, 81–96. doi: 10.1037/h0078791
(2013). Self-efficacy for affect regulation as a predictor of future life satisfaction and moderator of the negative affect-Life satisfaction relationship. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9312-4
(2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.647
(2006). The costs and benefits of writing, talking, and thinking about life’s triumphs and defeats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 692–708. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.69
(2001). Humor, laughter, and physical health: Methodological issues and research findings. Psycological Bulletin, 127, 504–519. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.504
(2015). Reciprocal relations between emotional self‐efficacy beliefs and ego‐resiliency across time. Journal of Personality, 5, 552–563. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12131
(2008). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
(2011). Measuring individual differences in emotion regulation: The Emotion Regulation Profile-Revised (ERP-R). Psychologica Belgica, 51, 49–91. doi: 10.5334/pb-51-1-49
(2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402. doi: 10.3758/BF03200807
(2010). Positive emotion regulation and well-being: Comparing the impact of eight savoring and dampening strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 368–373. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.048
(2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
. (2015). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
(2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 383–388. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605198104
(2000). Retrieving positive memories to regulate negative mood: Consequences for mood-congruent memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 737–752. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.737
(2009). Finding comfort in a joke: Consolatory effects of humor through cognitive distraction. Emotion, 9, 574–578. doi: 10.1037/a0015951
(2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 320–333. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320
(2002). Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 139–158. doi: 10.1177/1094428102005002001
(2003). Life is pleasant and memory helps to keep it that way!. Review of General Psychology, 7, 203–210. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.7.2.203
(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
(2006). Nice to know you: Positive emotions, self-other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of a new relationship. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 93–106. doi: 10.1080/17439760500510569
(