Skip to main content
Brief Report

Factor Structure and Longitudinal Factorial Validity of the Core Self-Evaluation Scale

Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000357

Abstract. The personality high-order concept of core self-evaluations (CSE), which refers to a basic evaluation of one’s worth, capability, and effectiveness, has attracted a lot of research interest. Yet little is known about the construct validity of the core self-evaluation scale (CSES) while information on its longitudinal factorial validity is wholly lacking. This study investigated the factor structure of the CSES using both confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis implemented in Mplus program. In addition, the factor loading invariance over time was investigated using exploratory structural equation modeling. Longitudinal data with three follow-ups over 2 years, gathered among university employees (n = 926 (T3)–2,137 (T1)), were used. The results showed that a two-factor solution comprising the sub-dimensions Internal and External self-evaluations fitted to the data better than the alternative factor models. The two-factor solution was also invariant across the three measurements. It is concluded that the CSES could be used as a two-dimensional instead of a one-dimensional scale. Splitting the scale into the two sub-dimensions of Internal and External self-evaluations revealed that the concept has a finer-grained structure than hitherto thought.

References

  • Albrecht, A-G., Paulus, F. M., Dilchert, S., Deller, J. & Ones, D. S. (2013). Construct- and criterion-related validity of the German Core Self-Evaluations Scale. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12, 85–91. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000070 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. doi: 10.1080/10705510903008204 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Booth, T. & Hughes, D. J. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling of personality data. Assessment, 21, 260–271. doi: 10.1177/1073191114528029 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chang, C-H., Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C. & Tan, J. A. (2012). Core self-evaluations: A review and evaluation of the literature. Journal of Management, 38, 81–128. doi: 10.1177/0149206311419661 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Biological dimensions of personality. In L. A. PervinEd., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 244–276). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heilmann, T. & Jonas, K. (2010). Validation of a German-language Core Self-Evaluations Scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 38, 209–226. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2010.38.2.209 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holt, D. T. & Jung, H.-H. (2008). Development of a Korean version of a Core Self-Evaluations Scale. Psychological Reports, 103, 415–425. doi: 10.2466/PRO.103.6.415-425 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E. & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluation scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00152.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A. & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. In L. CummingsB. StawEds., Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 151–188). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kinnunen, U., Mäkikangas, A., Mauno, S., Cuyper, N. & Witte, H. (2014). Development of perceived job insecurity across two years: Associations with antecedents and employee outcomes. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 243–258. doi: 10.1037/a0035835 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mauno, S., Cuyper, N., Kinnunen, U., Ruokolainen, M., Rantanen, J. & Mäkikangas, A. (2015). The prospective effects of work–family conflict and enrichment on job exhaustion and turnover intentions: comparing long-term temporary vs. permanent workers across three waves. Work & Stress, 29, 75–94. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2014.1003997 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus User’s Guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J-Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi: 10.1007/BF02296192 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sheykhshabani, S. H. (2011). Validity and reliability of the core self-evaluations scale in Iranian employees. Prodecia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1561–1565. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.331 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stumpp, T., Muck, P. M., Hülsheger, U. R., Judge, T. A. & Maier, G. W. (2010). Core self-evaluations in Germany: Validation of a German measure and its relationships with career success. Applied Psychology: An Internal Review, 59, 674–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00422.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar