Measurement Invariance of English and French Language Versions of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale
Abstract
Abstract. The alexithymia construct is commonly measured with the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), with more than 20 different language translations. Despite replication of the factor structure, however, it cannot be assumed that observed differences in mean TAS-20 scores can be interpreted similarly across different languages and cultural groups. It is necessary to also demonstrate measurement invariance (MI) for language. The aim of this study was to evaluate MI of the English and French versions of the TAS-20 using data from 17,866 Canadian military recruits; 71% spoke English and 29% spoke French as their first language. We used confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) to establish a baseline model of the TAS-20, and four increasingly restrictive multigroup CFA analyses to evaluate configural, metric, scalar, and residual error levels of MI. The best fitting factor structure in both samples was an oblique 3-factor model with an additional method factor comprised of negatively-keyed items. MI was achieved at all four levels of invariance. There were only small differences in mean scores across the two samples. Results support MI of English and French versions of the TAS-20, allowing meaningful comparisons of findings from investigations in Canadian French-speaking and English-speaking groups.
References
1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. doi: 10.1007/BF02294359
(2012). Alexithymia and emotional awareness in females with painful rheumatic conditions. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 73, 398–400. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.08.008
(2014). The internet administration version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Psychological Assessment, 26, 16–22. doi: 10.1037/a0034316
(1994). The Twenty-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale – I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 23–32. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1
(1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 33–40. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90006-X
(2006). The development of the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia: Item selection, factor structure, reliability and concurrent validity. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 75, 25–39. doi: 10.1159/000089224
(2005). ESQ 6.1 Structural equations program manual. Los Angeles, CA: Multivariate Software.
(2002). Effect of impaired recognition and expression of emotions on frontocingulate cortices: An fMRI study of men with alexithymia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 961–967.
(1993).
(Alternative ways of assessing model fit . In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
(2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1005–1018. doi: 10.1037/a0013193
(2002). Evaluating goodness-to-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
(2009). Assessing measurement and predictive invariance of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 in U.S. Anglo and U.S. Hispanic student samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 387–395. doi: 10.1080/00223890902936264
(2012). Alexithymia and dyadic adjustment in intimate relationships: Analyses using the actor partner interdependence model. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31, 1095–1111. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2012.31.10.1095
(2007). A confirmatory factor analytic investigation of the TAS-20: Corroboration of a five-factor model and suggestions for improvement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 247–257. doi: 10.1080/00223890701629730
(2009). The German version of the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia: Factor structure, reliability, and concurrent validity in a psychiatric patient sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 50, 424–430. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.11.008
(2010). Alexithymia in the interpersonal domain: A general deficit in empathy? Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 845–850. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.013
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
(2010). Descriptive analyses of the Recruit Health Questionnaire: 2003–2004 (DGMPRA TM 2010–010). Ottawa, Canada: Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis, Department of National Defence.
(2001). Factorial structure of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Confirmatory factorial analyses in nonclinical and clinical samples. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 50, 255–261. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00197-0
. (1996). Factor analysis of the French version of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). Psychopathology, 29, 139–144. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3
(2013). L’Alexithymie. Bruxelles, Belgium: De Boeck.
(2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
(2010). Taxometric analysis of alexithymia in a general population sample from Finland. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.038
(2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
(2008). Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment, 15, 36–47. doi: 10.1177/1073191107306140
(1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. doi: 10.1007/BF02294825
(2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 112–131.
(2003). Is there a reliable factorial structure in the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale? A comparison of factor models in clinical and normal adult samples. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55, 561–568. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00033-3
(1976).
(Alexithymia: A view of the psychosomatic process . In O. W. HillEd., Modern trends in psychosomatic medicine (Vol. 3, pp. 430–439). London, UK: Butterworths.2003). The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale III. Reliability and factorial validity in a community population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55, 269–275. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00578-0
(1994).
(Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis . In A. von EyeC. C. CloggEds., Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2008). SPSS Version 16.0 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Author.
(2012).
(The alexithymia personality dimension . In T. A. WidigerEd., The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 648–673). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.2013).
(Alexithymia and the five-factor model of alexithymia . In T. A. WidigerP. T. CostaJr.Eds., Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 193–207). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.2003). The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale IV. Reliability and factorial validity in different languages and cultures. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55, 277–283. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00601-3
(2010). Validation of a Greek adaptation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 51, 443–448. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.09.005
(2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002
(2007). Cross-cultural validation of a Chinese translation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 48, 489–496. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.04.007
(