Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

The Effect of Alternative Scoring Procedures on the Measurement Properties of a Self-Administered Depression Scale

An IRT Investigation on the CES-D Scale

Published Online:November 07, 2016https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000371

Abstract

Abstract. To investigate the effect of response alternatives/scoring procedures on the measurement properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) which has the four response alternatives, a polytomous item response theory (IRT) model was applied to the responses of 2,061 workers and university students (1,640 males, 421 females). Test information functions derived from the polytomous IRT analyses on the CES-D data with various scoring procedures indicated that: (1) the CES-D with its standard (0-1-2-3) scoring procedure should be useful for screening to detect subjects with “at high-risk” of depression if the θ point showing the highest information corresponds to the cut-off point, because of its extremely higher information; (2) the CES-D with the 0-1-1-2 scoring procedure could cover wider range of depressive severity, suggesting that this scoring procedure might be useful in cases where more exhaustive discrimination in symptomatology is of interest; and (3) the revised version of CES-D with replacing original positive items into negatively revised items outperformed the original version. These findings have never been demonstrated by the classical test theory analyses, and thus the utility of this kind of psychometric testing should be warranted to further investigation for the standard measures of psychological assessment.

References

  • Cho, M. J. & Kim, K. H. (1998). Use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale in Korea. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 186, 304–310. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199805000-00007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cook, K. F., Ashton, C. M., Byrne, M. M., Brody, B., Geraci, J., Giesler, R. B., … Wray, N. P. (2001). A psychometric analysis of the measurement level of the rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1275–1285. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200208000-00163 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Culp, A. M., Clyman, M. M. & Culp, R. E. (1995). Adolescent depressed mood, reports of suicide attempts, and asking for help. Adolescence, 30, 827–837.PMID: 8588519 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fava, G. A. (1983). Assessing depressive symptoms across cultures: Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 249–251. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198303)39:23.0.CO;2-Y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ferrari, A. J., Charlson, F. J., Norman, R. E., Patten, S. B., Freedman, G., Murray, C. J. L., … Whiteford, H. A. (2013). Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS Medicine, 10, e1001547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001547 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fuhrer, R. & Rouillon, F. (1989). La version francaise de l’echelle CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale). Description et traduction de l’echelle d’autoevaluation. [The French version of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale)]. European Psychiatry, 4, 163–166.[In French] First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, D. & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. NFER-Nelson Publishing: Windsor. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goodchild, M. E. & Duncan-Jones, P. (1985). Chronicity and the General Health Questionnaire. British Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 55–61. doi: 10.1192/bjp.146.1.55 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hambleton, R. K. & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Iwata, N. & Buka, S. (2002). Race/ethnicity and depressive symptoms: A cross-cultural/ethnic comparison among university students in East Asia, North and South America. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 2243–2252. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00003-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Iwata, N. & Higuchi, H. R. (2000). Responses of Japanese and American university students to the STAI items that assess the presence or absence of anxiety. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 48–62. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA740104 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Iwata, N. & Saito, K. (1987). Relationships of the Todai Health Index to the General Health Questionnaire and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Japanese Journal of Hygiene, 42, 865–873. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Iwata, N., Saito, K. & Roberts, R. E. (1994). Responses to a self-administered depression scale among younger adolescents in Japan. Psychiatry Research, 53, 275–287. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(94)90055-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Iwata, N., Umesue, M., Egashira, K., Hiro, H., Mizoue, T., Mishima, N. & Nagata, S. (1998). Can positive affect items be used to assess depressive disorders in the Japanese population? Psychological Medicine, 28, 153–158. doi: 10.1017/S0033291797005898 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jones, N. S. & Fonda, S. J. (2004). Use of an IRT-based latent variable model to link different forms of the CES-D from the Health and Retirement Study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 828–835. doi: 10.1007/s00127-004-0815-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mackinnon, A., McCallum, J., Andrews, G. & Anderson, I. (1998). The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in older community samples in Indonesia, North Korea, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, and Thailand. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 53B, 343–352.PMID: 9826965 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159–176. doi: 10.1177/014662169201600206 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muraki, E. & Bock, R. D. (2003). PARSCALE: Parameter scaling of rating data [Computer program]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software, Inc. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Myers, J. K. & Weissman, M. M. (1980). Use of a self-report symptom scale to detect depression in a community sample. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 1081–1084. PMID:7425160. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Orlando, M., Sherbourne, C. D. & Thissen, D. (2000). Summed-score linking using item response theory: Application to depression measurement. Psychological Assessment, 12, 354–359. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.12.3.354 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pickard, A. S., Dalal, M. R. & Bushnell, D. M. (2006). A comparison of depressive symptoms in stroke and primary care: Applying Rasch models to evaluate the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Value in Health, 9, 59–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00082.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Radloff, L. S. (1989). The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20, 149–166. doi: 10.1007/BF01537606 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shima, S., Shikano, T., Kitamura, T. & Asai, M. (1985). New self-rating scale for depression. Clinical Psychiatry, 27, 717–723.[In Japanese] First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shimomitsu, T., Yokoyama, K., Ono, Y., Maruta, T. & Tanigawa, T. (1998). Development of a novel Brief Job Stress Questionnaire. In S. KatoEd., Report of the research grant for the prevention of work-related diseases from the Ministry of Labour (pp. 107–115) [In Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Labour. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1989). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Bibliography (2nd Ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stansbury, J. P., Ried, L. D. & Velozo, C. A. (2006). Unidimensionality and bandwidth in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 10–22. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_03 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Takane, Y. & de Leeuw, J. (1987). On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika, 52, 393–408. doi: 10.1007/BF02294363 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar