Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Free AccessEditorial

50 Facets of a Trait – 50 Ways to Mess Up?

Published Online:June 06, 2016https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000372
Free first page

References

  • Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beauducel, A. & Kersting, M. (2002). Fluid and crystallized intelligence and the Berlin Model of Intelligence Structure (BIS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 97–112. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bejar, I. I. (1983). Achievement testing: Recent advances. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brunner, M. & Süß, H. M. (2005). Analyzing the reliability of multidimensional measures: An example from intelligence research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 227–240. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Campbell, D. T. & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1995a). Domains and facets – Hierarchical personality-assessment using the revised neo personality-inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21–50. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1995b). Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: A reply to Block. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 216–220. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cronbach, L. J. & Gleser, G. (1965). The bandwidth-fidelity dilemma. Psychological tests and personnel decisions (pp. 97–107). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cronbach, L. J. & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 391–418. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Di Blas, L. (2000). A validation study of the Interpersonal Circumplex Scales in the Italian language. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 177. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1947). The dimensions of human personality. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R. & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hofstee, W. K., De Raad, B. & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146–163. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horstmann, K. T. & Ziegler, M. (2016). Situational Perception: Its Theoretical Foundation, Assessment, and Links to Personality. In U. KumarEd., The Wiley Handbook of Personality Assessment (pp. 31–43). Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, K. & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, K. & Ashton, M. C. (2006). Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form. Psychological Assessment, 18, 182–191. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leue, A. & Beauducel, A. (2011). The PANAS structure revisited: On the validity of a bifactor model in community and forensic samples. Psychological Assessment, 23, 215–225. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1986). Negative item bias in ratings scales for preadolescent children: A cognitive-developmental phenomenon. Developmental Psychology, 22, 37–49. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810–819. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Martínez-Arias, R., Silva, F., Díaz-Hidalgo, M. T., Ortet, G. & Moro, M. (1999). The structure of Wiggins’ interpersonal circumplex: Cross-cultural studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 196–205. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R. (2015). A more nuanced view of reliability: Specificity in the trait hierarchy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 97–112. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S. & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 28–50. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McGrew, K. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37, 1–10. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., Gaughan, E. T., Maples, J. & Price, J. (2011). A comparison of agreeableness scores from the Big Five Inventory and the NEO PI-R: Consequences for the study of narcissism and psychopathy. Assessment, 18, 335–339. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ones, D. & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609–626. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pace, V. L. & Brannick, M. T. (2010). How similar are personality scales of the “same” construct? A meta-analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 669–676. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paunonen, S. V. & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524–539. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paunonen, S. V. & Ashton, M. C. (2013). On the prediction of academic performance with personality traits: A replication study. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 778–781. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rauthmann, J. F. & Sherman, R. A. (2016). Measuring the situational eight DIAMONDS characteristics of situations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 165–174. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Rauthmann, J. F., Sherman, R. A. & Funder, D. C. (2015). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 363–381. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Raykov, T. & Pohl, S. (2013). On studying common factor variance in multiple-component measuring instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 191–209. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S. & Berges, A. (2013). Conscientiousness, its facets, and the prediction of job performance ratings: Evidence against the narrow measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 74–84. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Siegling, A. B., Petrides, K. V. & Martskvishvili, K. (2015). An examination of a new psychometric method for optimizing multi-faceted assessment instruments in the context of trait emotional intelligence. European Journal of Personality, 29, 42–54. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sparfeldt, J. R., Brunnemann, N., Wirthwein, L., Buch, S. R., Schult, J. & Rost, D. H. (2015). General versus specific achievement goals: A re-examination. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 170–177. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Woods, S. A. & Anderson, N. R. (2016). Toward a periodic table of personality: Mapping personality scales between the five-factor model and the circumplex model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 582–604. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ziegler, M. (2014). Stop and state your intentions! Let’s not forget the ABC of test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 239–242. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Ziegler, M., Bensch, D., Maaß, U., Schult, V., Vogel, M. & Bühner, M. (2014). Big Five facets as predictor of job training performance: The role of specific job demands. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 1–7. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ziegler, M., Booth, T. & Bensch, D. (2013). Getting entangled in the nomological net. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 157–161. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Ziegler, M. & Brunner, M. (2016). Test standards and psychometric modeling. In A. A. LipnevichF. PreckelR. RobertsEds., Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century (pp. 29–55). New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, M. & Bühner, M. (2009). Modeling socially desirable responding and its effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 548–565. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Schölmerich, F. & Bühner, M. (2010). Predicting academic success with the Big 5 rated from different points of view: Self-rated, other rated and faked. European Journal of Personality, 24, 341–355. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ziegler, M., Dietl, E., Danay, E., Vogel, M. & Bühner, M. (2011). Predicting training success with general mental ability, specific ability tests, and (un) structured interviews: A meta analysis with unique samples. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 170–182. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ziegler, M. & Hagemann, D. (2015). Testing the unidimensionality of items: Pitfalls and loopholes. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31, 231–237. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Ziegler, M. & Horstmann, K. (2015). Discovering the second side of the coin: Integrating situational perception into psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31, 69–74. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Ziegler, M., Poropat, A. & Mell, J. (2014). Does the length of a questionnaire matter? Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 250–261. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Ziegler, M. & Ziegler, J. (2015). Better understanding of psychological situations: opportunities and challenges for psychological assessment. European Journal of Personality, 29, 418–419. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I. & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar