Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Applying the Latent State-Trait Analysis to Decompose State, Trait, and Error Components of the Self-Esteem Implicit Association Test

Published Online:December 29, 2016https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000378

Abstract

Abstract. In the literature, self-report scales of Self-Esteem (SE) often showed a higher test-retest correlation and a lower situational variability compared to implicit measures. Moreover, several studies showed a close to zero implicit-explicit correlation. Applying a latent state-trait (LST) model on a sample of 95 participants (80 females, mean age: 22.49 ± 6.77 years) assessed at five measurement occasions, the present study aims at decomposing latent trait, latent state residual, and measurement error of the SE Implicit Association Test (SE-IAT). Moreover, in order to compare implicit and explicit variance components, a multi-construct LST was analyzed across two occasions, including both the SE-IAT and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). Results revealed that: (1) the amounts of state and trait variance in the SE-IAT were rather similar; (2) explicit SE showed a higher consistency, a lower occasion-specificity, and a lower proportion of error variance than SE-IAT; (3) latent traits of explicit and implicit SE showed a positive and significant correlation of moderate size. Theoretical implications for the implicit measurement of self-esteem were discussed.

References

  • Bosson, J., Swann, W. B. Jr. & Pennebaker, J. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631–643. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.631 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buhrmester, M. D., Blanton, H. & Swann, W. (2011). Implicit self-esteem: Nature, measurement, and a new way forward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 365–385. doi: 10.1037/a0021341 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cai, H., Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., Wang, C., Carvallo, M., Xu, Y., … Eckstein-Jackson, L. (2011). Tactical self-enhancement in China: Is modesty at the service of self-enhancement in East-Asian culture? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 59–64. doi: 10.1177/1948550610376599 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeHart, T., Pelham, B. W. & Tennen, H. (2006). What lies beneath: Parenting style and implicit self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.12.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Deinzer, R., Steyer, R., Eid, M., Notz, P., Schwenkmezger, P., Ostendorf, F. & Neubauer, A. (1995). Situational effects in trait assessment: The FPI, NEO-FFI, and EPI questionnaires. European Journal of Personality, 9, 1–23. doi: 10.1002/per.2410090102 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dentale, F., San Martini, P., De Coro, A. & Di Pomponio, I. (2010). Alexithymia increases the discordance between implicit and explicit self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 762–767. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.022 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dentale, F., Vecchione, M., De Coro, A. & Barbaranelli, C. (2012). On the relationship between implicit and explicit self-esteem: The moderating role of dismissing attachment. Personality and Individual differences, 52, 173–177. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Egloff, B., Schwerdtfeger, A. & Schmukle, S. C. (2005). Temporal stability of the Implicit Association Test-Anxiety. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 82–88. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8401_14 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eid, M. (1996). Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis for polytomous item responses: Model definition and model selection on the basis of stochastic measurement theory. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 1, 65–85. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eid, M., Schneider, C. & Schwenkmezger, P. (1999). Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits. European Journal of Personality, 13, 283–306. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199907/08) First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. & Creighton, L. A. (2013). Dual-process theories. In D. E. CarlstonEd., The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 282–312). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B., Deutsch, R., LeBel, E. & Peters, K. (2008). Response interference as a mechanism underlying implicit measures: Some traps and gaps in the assessment of mental associations with experimental paradigms. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 218–228. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.218 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Geiser, C. & Lockhart, G. (2012). A comparison of four approaches to account for method effects in latent state trait analyses. Psychological Methods, 17, 255–283. doi: 10.1037/a0026977 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022–1038. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E. & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A. & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Heatherton, T. F. & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895–910. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T. & Schmitt, M. (2005). On implicit-explicit consistency: The moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment. European Journal of Personality, 19, 25–49. doi: 10.1002/per.537 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Holt. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Karpinski, A. & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16–32. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemas and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F. & Nagengast, B. (2010). Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22, 366–381. doi: 10.1037/a0019225 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L.K. & Muthén, B.O. (2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O. & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An Inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pohl, S. & Steyer, R. (2010). Modelling common traits and method effects in multitrait-multimethod analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 1–28. doi: 10.1080/00273170903504729 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pohl, S., Steyer, R. & Krause, K. (2008). Modelling method effects as individual causal effects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 171, 41–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00517.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Prezza, M., Trombaccia, F. R. & Armento, L. (1997). La scala dell’autostima di Rosenberg: Traduzione e validazione italiana.[Rosenberg self-esteem scale: Italian translation and validation] Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 223, 35–44. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A., Dohn, M. C. & Fairchild, K. (2007). Implicit Self-Esteem compensation: Automatic threat defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 798–813. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.798 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi: 10.1007/BF02296192 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmukle, S. C. & Egloff, B. (2004). Does the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety measure trait and state variance? European Journal of Personality, 18, 483–494. doi: 10.1002/per.525 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmukle, S. C. & Egloff, B. (2005). A latent state-trait analysis of implicit and explicit personality measures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 100–107. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.100 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Gonsalkorale, K., Hugenberg, K., Allen, T. J. & Groom, C. J. (2008). The self-regulation of automatic associations and behavioral impulses. Psychological Review, 115, 314–335. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.314 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steyer, R., Ferring, D. & Schmitt, M. J. (1992). States and traits in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8, 79–98. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steyer, R., Majcen, A. M., Schwenkmezger, P. & Buchner, A. (1989). A latent state-trait anxiety model and its application to determine consistency and specificity coefficients. Anxiety Research, 1, 281–299. doi: 10.1080/08917778908248726 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steyer, R. & Schmitt, M. (1990). The effects of aggregation across and within occasions on consistency, specificity, and reliability. Methodika, 4, 58–94. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steyer, R., Schmitt, M. & Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389–408. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steyer, R., Mayer, A., Geiser, C. & Cole, D. (2015). A theory of states and traits – Revised. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11, 71–98. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153719 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Teige-Mocigemba, S., Klauer, K. C. & Sherman, J. W. (2010). Practical guide to Implicit Association Test and related tasks. In B. GawronskiB. K. PayneEds., Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 117–139). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vecchione, M., Dentale, F., Alessandri, G. & Barbaranelli, C. (2014). Fakability of implicit and explicit measures of the Big five: Research findings from organizational settings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22, 211–218. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12070 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zeigler-Hill, V. & Jordan, C. H. (2010). Two faces of self-esteem: Implicit and explicit forms of self-esteem. In B. GawronskiB. K. PayneEds., Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 392–407). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar