Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000379

Abstract. Health care workers’ attitudes toward people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) can play an important role in the quality of life of PLWHA as well as in public health efforts in HIV prevention and treatment. The main aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of an instrument to measure health care workers’ attitudes toward PLWHA using bifactor and IRT analyses. We applied bifactor and Item Response Theory (IRT) analyses to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. A sample of 836 Italian health care workers was recruited in 2013, including medical practitioners, nurses, health care assistants, social workers, and psychologists. We tested a hierarchical item response model (bifactor model) with model fit comparisons with one-dimensional and five-dimensional models. The bifactor model was found to provide the best fit to the observed data. The results were used to construct a 15-item short form. The test information function showed that the scale was slightly more precise at higher levels of negative attitudes. Finally, the differential item functioning (DIF) analysis revealed that the items did not function differently across gender or professional groups. The instrument was found to have good criterion validity with regard to discriminatory practices toward HIV-infected patients.

References

  • Andrewin, A. & Chien, L. Y. (2008). Stigmatization of patients with HIV/AIDS among doctors and nurses in Belize. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 22, 897–906. doi: 10.1089/apc.2007.0219 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chalmers, R. P. (2012). mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–29. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E. & Crane, P. K. (2011). lordif: An R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Statistical Software, 39, 1–30. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Ocepek-Welikson, K., Cook, K., Cella, D., Narasimhalu, K., … Teresi, J. A. (2007). A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression. Quality of Life Research, 16, 69–84. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9185-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Froman, R. D. & Owen, S. V. (1997). Further validation of the AIDS Attitude Scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 20, 161–167. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199704)20:2<161::AID-NUR8>3.0.CO;2-I First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbons, R. D., Bock, R. D., Hedeker, D., Weiss, D. J., Segawa, E., Bhaumik, D. K., … Stover, A. (2007). Full-information item bifactor analysis of graded response data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 4–19. doi: 10.1177/0146621606289485 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glasman, L. R. & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 778–822. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hambleton, R. K. & Slater, S. C. (1997). Item response theory models and testing practices: Current international status and future directions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 21–28. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.13.1.21 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Li, L., Wu, Z., Wu, S., Zhaoc, Y., Jia, M. & Yan, Z. (2007). HIV-related stigma in health care settings: A survey of service providers in China. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 21, 753–762. doi: 10.1089/apc.2006.0219 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Naughton, J. D. & Vanable, P. A. (2013). HIV stigmatization among healthcare providers: Review of the evidence and implications for HIV care. In P. LiamputtongEd., Stigma, discrimination and living with HIV/AIDS (pp. 97–114). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nazik, E., Arslan, S., Özdemir, F. & Apay, S. (2012). Turkish nursing students’ attitudes about patients living with HIV/AIDS. Sexuality and Disability, 30, 433–439. doi: 10.1007/s11195-012-9281-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M. & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sanchez, G., Trinchera, L. & Russolillo, G. (2013). plspm: Tools for Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM) (Version 0.4.1). Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/plspm/index.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D. & Simonsohn, U. (2012). A 21 word solution. SPSP Dialogue, 4. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2160588 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stein, J. A. & Li, L. (2008). Measuring HIV-related stigma among Chinese service providers: Confirmatory factor analysis of a multidimensional scale. AIDS and Behavior, 12, 789–795. doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9339-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Brakel, W. H. (2006). Measuring health-related stigma – a literature review. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 11, 307–334. doi: 10.1080/13548500600595160 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Varas-Diaz, N. & Neilands, T. B. (2009). Development and validation of a culturally appropriate HIV/AIDS Stigma Scale for Puerto Rican health professionals in training. AIDS Care, 21, 1259–1270. doi: 10.1080/09540120902804297 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Visser, M. J., Kershaw, T., Makin, J. D. & Forsyth, B. W. (2008). Development of parallel scales to measure HIV-related stigma. AIDS and Behavior, 12, 759–771. doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9363-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wong, V. & Wong, L. (2006). Management of stigma and disclosure of HIV/AIDS status in healthcare settings. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 20, 95–114. doi: 10.1108/14777260610661501 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar