Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000383

Abstract. Student conceptions about assessment may be positive or negative, exemplify various beliefs and expectations, and are hypothesized to relate to student outcomes, for example, grades. The current study investigates the factorial structure of the Students’ Conceptions of Assessment-VI inventory using data from Gymnasium students, that is, 7th- to 9th-graders, in Cyprus. Acceptable fit was found for a multidimensional hierarchical model with four second-order factors relating to assessment conceptions: improvement of teaching and learning, external motives, affective/social activity, and a negative, unfair, or valueless practice. Strong evidence of measurement invariance with respect to gender was found, with higher endorsement of some positive beliefs about assessment by females. The conception of assessment for improvement positively predicted language grades, while the other three assessment conceptions had negative regression coefficients. The adaptation of the inventory in Greek demonstrated good psychometric properties. Findings suggest that conceptions about assessment can be adaptive or maladaptive and relate to achievement outcomes.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior (2nd ed.). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, G. T. (2004). Measuring attitude with positively packed self-report ratings: Comparison of agreement and frequency scales. Psychological Reports, 94, 1015–1024. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, G. T. (2011). Self-regulation of assessment beliefs and attitudes: A review of the Students’ Conceptions of Assessment inventory. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology 31(6), 731–748. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Student conceptions of assessment across cultural and contextual differences: University student perspectives of assessment from Brazil, China, Hong Kong, and New Zealand. In G. A. D. LiemA. B. I. BernardoEds., Advancing cross-cultural perspectives on educational psychology: A Festschrift for Dennis McInerney (pp. 143–167). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, G. T. L. & Harris, L. R. (2012). Student conceptions of assessment by level of schooling: Further evidence for ecological rationality in belief systems. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 12, 46–59. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, G. T. & Hirschfield, G. H. (2007). Students’ conceptions of assessment and mathematics: Self-regulation raises achievement. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 7, 63–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, G. T. L. & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2008). Students’ conceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practices, 15, 3–17. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, G. T. L., Irving, S. E., Peterson, E. R. & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2009). Use of interactive-informal assessment practices: New Zealand secondary students’ conceptions of assessment. Learning and Instruction, 19, 97–111. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, G. T. L. & Michaelides, M. P. (2011). Ecological rationality in teachers’ conceptions of assessment across samples from Cyprus and New Zealand. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26, 319–337. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, G. T., Peterson, E. R. & Irving, S. E. (2009). Beliefs that make a difference: Adaptive and Maladaptive Self-regulation in Students’ Conceptions of Assessment. In D. M. McInerneyG. T. L. BrownG. A. D. LiemEds., Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 159–186). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, G. T. & Wang, Z. (2013). Illustrating assessment: How Hong Kong university students conceive of the purposes of assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 1037–1057. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Higher Education, 22, 201–204. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fan, X. & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 509–529. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hirschfeld, G. H. & Brown, G. T. (2009). Students’ conceptions of assessment: Factorial and structural invariance of the SCoA across sex, age, and ethnicity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 30–38. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Hox, J. J. & Maas, C. J. (2001). The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modeling with pseudobalanced groups and small samples. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 157–174. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matos, D. A. S. & Brown, G. T. L. (2015). Comparing university student conceptions of assessment: Brazilian and New Zealand beliefs. In C. CarvalhoJ. ConboyEds., Feedback, Identidade, Trajetórias Escolares: Dinâmicas e Consequências (pp. 177–194). Lisbon, Portugal: Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto de Educação. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Michaelides, M. P. (2014). Validity considerations ensuing from examinees’ perceptions about high-stakes national examinations in Cyprus. Assessment in Education: Principles. Policy & Practice, 21, 427–441. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Michaelides, M. P. & Theodorou, C. (2014, October). Teachers’ conceptions about assessment: Adaptation of a scale on a Cypriot sample [in Greek]. The Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the Pedagogical Association of Cyprus (265–275). Nicosia, Cyprus: PEK. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Segers, M. & Dochy, F. (2001). New assessment forms in problem-based learning: The value-added of the students’ perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 327–343. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Struyven, K., Dochy, F. & Janssens, S. (2002). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 325–341. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taras, M. (2005). Assessment–summative and formative–some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53, 466–478. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weekers, A. M., Brown, G. T. & Veldkamp, B. P. (2009). Analyzing the Dimensionality of the Students’ Conceptions of Assessment (SCoA) Inventory. In D. M. McInerneyG. T. L. BrownG. A. D. LiemEds., Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 133–157). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wise, S. L. & Cotten, M. R. (2009). Test-taking effort and score validity: The influence of student conceptions of assessment. In D. M. McInerneyG. T. L. BrownG. A. D. LiemEds., Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 187–205). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar