A Look Back and a Glimpse Forward
A Personal Exchange Between the Current and the Incoming Editor-in-Chief of EJPA
References
2016). Anomalous results in g-factor models. Explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/met0000083
(2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009
(2014). The time on task effect in reading and problem solving is moderated by task difficulty and skill: Insights from a computer-based large-scale assessment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 608–626. doi: 10.1037/a0034716
(2015). Computer-generated log-file analyses as a window into students’ minds? A showcase study based on the PISA 2012 assessment of problem solving. Computers & Education, 91, 92–105. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.018
(2015). Connecting personality structure and dynamics. Towards a more evidence-based and clinically useful diagnostic scheme. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 431–448. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.431
(2008). The role of psychophysiology in forensic assessments. Deception detection, ERPs, and virtual reality mock crime scenarios. Psychophysiology, 45, 286–298.
(2010). Two- vs. three-dimensional presentation of mental rotation tasks. Sex differences and effects of training on performance and brain activation. Intelligence, 38, 529–539. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2010.06.001
(2014). The Situational Eight DIAMONDS. A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0037250
(2016a). Measuring the Situational Eight DIAMONDS characteristics of situations. An optimization of the RSQ-8 to the S8*. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 155–164. doi: 10.1027/1015–5759/a000246
(2016b). Ultra-brief measures for the Situational Eight DIAMONDS domains. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 165–174. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000245
(2015). Principles of situation research. Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 363–381. doi: 10.1002/per.1994
(2016). Advances in the science of assessment. Educational Assessment, 2016, 1–27. doi: 10.1080/10627197.2015.1127752
(2014a). Comments on item selection procedures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 1–2. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000196
(2014b). Stop and state your intentions! Let’s not forget the ABC of test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 239–242. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000228
(2015). “F*** you, I won’t do what you told me!” Response biases as threats to psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31, 153–158. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000292
(2013). Lost in translation. Thoughts regarding the translation of existing psychological measures into other languages. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 81–83. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000167
(2015). Discovering the second side of the coin. Integrating situational perception into psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31, 69–74. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000258
(