Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Multistudy Report

An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

Published Online:April 07, 2017https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000390

Abstract

Abstract. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) assesses five subscales for measuring child adjustment. In the present study, an item response theory approach was used to analyze the parent version of the SDQ subscales and the total difficulties score (TDS), which is obtained by summing up the scores of the four problem subscales. Analyses are based on two data sets: The German Family Panel “Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam, N = 1,078)” and the survey “Growing up in Germany” (Aufwachsen in Deutschland: Alltagswelten; AID:A, N = 1,346). Partial credit and generalized partial credit models were estimated for each subscale and a bifactor model was applied to the TDS. The results showed satisfying psychometric properties in both samples for each of the five subscales, except for the “Hyperactivity/Inattention” subscales which seemed to have a two-dimensional structure. Item discrimination and category threshold parameters were broadly comparable between the samples. According to the bifactor models, there is evidence for multidimensionality in the TDS, but the general factor was strong. Thus, the TDS can be treated as essentially unidimensional, although some subscales may be of additional value.

References

  • Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4–18, YSR, and TRF profiles. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, A., Woerner, W., Hasselhorn, M., Banaschewski, T. & Rothenberger, A. (2004). Validation of the parent and teacher SDQ in a clinical sample. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, ii11–ii16. doi: 10.1007/s00787-004-2003-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Böhnke, J. R. & Croudace, T. J. (2015). Factors of psychological distress: Clinical value, measurement substance, and methodological artefacts. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50, 515–524. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1022-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Böhnke, J. R. & Lutz, W. (2014). Using item and test information to optimize targeted assessments of psychological distress. Assessment, 21, 679–693. doi: 10.1177/1073191114529152 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brunner, M., Nagy, G. & Wilhelm, O. (2012). A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs. Journal of Personality, 80, 796–846. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00749.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Caci, H., Morin, A. J. S. & Tran, A. (2015). Investigation of a bifactor model of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24, 1291–1301. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0679-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cai, L. (2010). A two-tier full-information item factor analysis model with applications. Psychometrika, 75, 581–612. doi: 10.1007/s11336-010-9178-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cai, L., Yang, J. S. & Hansen, M. (2011). Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 221–248. doi: 10.1037/a0023350 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chalmers, R. P. (2012). mirt: A Multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–29. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i06 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, W. H. & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265–289. doi: 10.3102/10769986022003265 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dumenci, L. & Achenbach, T. M. (2008). Effects of estimation methods on making trait-level inferences from ordered categorical items for assessing psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 20, 55–62. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.55 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gignac, G. E. (2014). On the inappropriateness of using items to calculate total scale score reliability via coefficient alpha for multidimensional scales. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 130–139. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000181 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Goodman, A., Lamping, D. L. & Ploubidis, G. B. (2010). When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Data from British parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 1179–1191. doi: 10.1007/s10802-010-9434-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337–1345. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hagquist, C. (2007). The psychometric properties of the self-reported SDQ: An analysis of Swedish data based on the Rasch model. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1289–1301. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Heiervang, E., Stormark, K. M., Lundervold, A. J., Heimann, M., Goodman, R., Posserud, M. B., … Gillberg, C. (2007). Psychiatric disorders in Norwegian 8-to 10-year-olds: An epidemiological survey of prevalence, risk factors, and service use. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 438–447. doi: 10.1097/chi.0b013e31803062bf First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Huinink, J., Brüderl, J., Nauck, B., Walper, S., Castiglioni, L. & Feldhaus, M. (2011). Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung – Journal of Family Research, 23, 77–101. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jennrich, R. I. & Bentler, P. M. (2011). Exploratory bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 76, 537–549. doi: 10.1007/s11336-011-9218-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klasen, H., Woerner, W., Wolke, D., Meyer, R., Overmeyer, S., Kaschnitz, W., … Goodman, R. (2000). Comparing the German versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the child behavior checklist. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 271–276. doi: 10.1007/s007870070030 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kóbor, A., Takács, Á. & Urbán, R. (2013). The bifactor model of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 299–307. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000160 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174. doi: 10.1007/BF02296272 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159–176. doi: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1992.tb01436.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Niclasen, J., Skovgaard, A. M., Nybo Andersen, A.-M., Somhovd, M. J. & Obel, C. (2013). A confirmatory approach to examining the factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): A large scale cohort study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 355–365. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9683-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Patalay, P., Fonagy, P., Deighton, J., Belsky, J., Vostanis, P. & Wolpert, M. (2015). A general psychopathology factor in early adolescence. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 207, 15–22. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.14959 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Prady, S. L., Pickett, K. E., Croudace, T., Mason, D., Petherick, E. S., McEachan, R. R., … Wright, J. (2016). Maternal psychological distress in primary care and association with child behavioural outcomes at age three. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 25(6), 601–613. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0777-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rauschenbach, T. & Bien, W. (2012). Aufwachsen in Deutschland. AID:A – Der neue DJI-Survey [Growing up in Germany. AID:A – The new DJI survey]. Weinheim, Germany: Juventa. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reckase, M. D. (2009). Multidimensional item reponse theory. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667–696. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M. & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P. & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. doi: 10.1037/met0000045 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rost, J. & Von Davier, M. (1994). A conditional item-fit index for Rasch models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 171–182. doi: 10.1177/014662169401800206 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rothenberger, A., Becker, A., Erhart, M., Wille, D. P. N. & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2008). Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: Results of the BELLA study. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 99–105. doi: 10.1007/s00787-008-1011-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometric Monograph Supplement, 34 (Monograph No. 17). Richmond, VA: Psychometric Society. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stone, L. L., Janssens, J. M., Vermulst, A. A., van der Maten, M., Engels, R. C. & Otten, R. (2015). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7. BMC Psychology, 3, 4. doi: 10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Engels, R. C., Vermulst, A. A. & Janssens, J. M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: A review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13, 254–274. doi: 10.1007/s10567-010-0071-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Ringlever, L., Hiemstra, M., Engels, R. C., Vermulst, A. A. & Janssens, J. M. (2013). The parent version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 44–50. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000119 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Van Roy, B., Veenstra, M. & Clench-Aas, J. (2008). Construct validity of the five-factor Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early- and late adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 1304–1312. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01942.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Von Davier, M. (2001). WINMIRA 2001 user’s guide. Kiel, Germany: IPN. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wirth, R. J. & Edwards, M. C. (2007). Item factor analysis: Current approaches and future directions. Psychological Methods, 12, 58–79. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.58 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Woerner, W., Becker, A. & Rothenberger, A. (2004). Normative data and scale properties of the German parent SDQ. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, ii3–ii10. doi: 10.1007/s00787-004-2002-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar