Skip to main content
Original Article

Personality and Intelligence

Examining the Associations of Investment-Related Personality Traits With General and Specific Intelligence

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000391

Abstract. In this study, we examine the associations of the scales of the California Psychological Inventory (CPI; a measure of personality traits) with intelligence measured by four cognitive ability tests, completed by a sample of 4,876 working adults. We framed our analyses of the correlations around the investment perspective on the personality-intelligence relationship that proposes traits are associated with investment in intellectual activity, which develops cognitive abilities over time. In particular, we report associations between investment-related scales (Intellectual Efficiency, Flexibility, Achievement via Independence, Psychological-mindedness, and Tolerance) and a higher-order personality factor (Originality) of the CPI with intelligence measured at broad and narrow levels of abstraction. We found positive associations between investment-related scales, and Originality with observed ability test scores and factor g extracted from test scores. We found positive associations of traits with unique variance in verbal ability measures, but negative with measures of quantitative and visuospatial abilities. Our study extends the literature on investment theories of intelligence-personality relations, is the first study to examine the associations of multiple scales of the CPI with intelligence measures, and adds much needed data to the literature from a working adult sample.

References

  • Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.2.219 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arteche, A., Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., Ackerman, P., & Furnham, A. (2009). Typical intellectual engagement as a byproduct of openness, learning approaches, and self‐assessed intelligence. Educational Psychology, 29, 357–367. doi: 10.1080/01443410902927833 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J. B., & Van Aken, M. A. (2003). Validity of Big Five personality judgments in childhood: A 9 year longitudinal study. European Journal of Personality, 17, 1–17. doi: 10.1002/per.460 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., & Gibson, G. J. (1997). Relationships between ability and personality: Three hypotheses tested. Intelligence, 25, 49–70. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90007-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73, 825–858. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00330.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Djapo, N., Kolenovic-Djapo, J., Djokic, R., & Fako, I. (2011). Relationship between Cattell’s 16PF and fluid and crystallized intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 63–67. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1994). Personality and intelligence: Psychometric and experimental approaches. In R. J. SternbergP. RuzgisEds., Personality and intelligence (pp. 3–31). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Furnham, A., Dissou, G., Sloan, P., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2007). Personality and intelligence in business people: A study of two personality and two intelligence measures. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 99–109. doi: 10.1007/s10869-007-9051-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gough, H. G. (1987). The California Psychological Inventory administrator’s guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gough, H. G., & Bradley, P. (1996). The California Psychological Inventory manual. Mountain View, CA: CPP. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Grice, J. W. (2001). Computing and evaluating factor scores. Psychological Methods, 6, 430–450. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.430 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. (2005). The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393–416. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2004.12.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Major, J. T., Johnson, W., & Deary, I. J. (2014). Linear and nonlinear associations between general intelligence and personality in Project TALENT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 638–654. doi: 10.1037/a0035815 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Piedmont, R. L. (1993). Folk concepts, natural language, and psychological constructs: The California Psychological Inventory and the Five‐Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 61, 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00276.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Paltiel, L. (2005). Can personality factors predict intelligence? Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1021–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.06.023 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pearson Talent Lens (2007). Wesman Personnel Classification Test (Verbal Reasoning), Technical Report. Retrieved from http://us.talentlens.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Wesman_Technical_Report.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reeve, C. L., Meyer, R. D., & Bonaccio, S. (2006). Intelligence-personality associations reconsidered: The importance of distinguishing between general and narrow dimensions of intelligence. Intelligence, 34, 387–402. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2005.11.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruch, W. W., Stang, S. W., McKillip, R. H., & Dye, D. A. (1994). Employee aptitude survey technical manual (2nd ed.). Glendale, CA: Psychological Services. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2009). A general factor of personality in 16 sets of the Big Five, the Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey, the California Psychological Inventory, and the Temperament and Character Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 558–564. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2009). Using the California Psychological Inventory to assess the Big Five personality domains: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Soubelet, A., & Salthouse, T. A. (2011). Personality-cognition relations across adulthood. Developmental psychology, 47, 303. doi: 10.1037/a0021816 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • von Stumm, S., & Ackerman, P. L. (2013). Investment and intellect: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 841–869. doi: 10.1037/a0030746 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • von Stumm, S., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Quiroga, M. A., & Colom, R. (2009). Separating narrow and general variances in intelligence-personality associations. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 336–341. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.024 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wainwright, M. A., Wright, M. J., Luciano, M., Geffen, G. M., & Martin, N. G. (2008). Genetic covariation among facets of Openness to Experience and general cognitive ability. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 11, 275–286. doi: 10.1375/twin.11.3.275 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, G. B., & Glaser, E. M. (2002). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal forms A and B manual. England: The Psychological Corporation. Retrieved from http://us.talentlens.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/WatsonGlaser_Form_AB_M001.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wesman, A. G. (1965). Wesman Personnel Classification Test manual. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wolf, M. B., & Ackerman, P. L. (2005). Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 531–542. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.020 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woods, S. A., & Anderson, N. R. (2016). Toward a periodic table of personality: Mapping Personality Scales between the Five-Factor Model and the Circumplex Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 582–604. doi: 10.1037/apl0000062 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woods, S. A., & Hampson, S. E. (2010). Predicting adult occupational environments from childhood personality traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1045–1057. doi: 10.1037/a0020600 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woods, S. A., & Hardy, C. (2012). The higher-order factor structures of five personality inventories. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woods, S. A., Lievens, F., De Fruyt, F., & Wille, B. (2013). Personality across working life: The longitudinal and reciprocal influences of personality on work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, S7–S25. doi: 10.1002/job.1863 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woods, S. A., & West, M. A. (2014). The Psychology of Work and Organizations (2nd ed.). Hampshire: CENGAGE. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2000). Personality and intelligence. In R. J. SternbergEd., Handbook of Human Intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 581–610) doi: 101017/CBO9780511807947027. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, M., Cengia, A., Mussel, P., & Gerstorf, D. (2015). Openness as a buffer against cognitive decline: The Openness-Fluid-Crystallized-Intelligence (OFCI) model applied to late adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 30, 573. doi: 10.1037/a0039493 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Heene, M., Asendorpf, J., & Bühner, M. (2012). Openness, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimprich, D., Allemand, M., & Dellenbach, M. (2009). Openness to experience, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence in middle-aged and old adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 444–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.018 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar