Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

Developing a Brief Version of Ryff’s Scale to Assess the Psychological Well-Being of Adolescents in Hong Kong

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000403

Abstract. Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS) has provided a useful measure for investigating the eudaimonic well-being of adults and elderly people from the positive psychology perspective. However, its length and structure, and its applicability to younger populations have raised important concerns in the assessment with Chinese adolescents. Although different shortened versions of PWBS in various languages have been developed, they were mostly not adapted for use with adolescents and did not have satisfactory model fit and internal consistencies. This investigation aimed to develop a brief Chinese PWBS version to assess the eudaimonic well-being of adolescents in Hong Kong. Two studies related to scale development and validation involving three samples of 1,433 adolescents from Hong Kong were reported. Item selection, construct validation, model testing, and rewording of items to suit adolescent use were guided by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses as well as correlations with external scales assessing similar PWBS content dimensions. The resulting 24-item Chinese PWBS includes only positively keyed items in simple language suitable for adolescent use. Validation and cross-validation results have demonstrated that it is a brief, valid, and reliable scale for assessing adolescent psychological well-being in six dimensions in the Chinese context.

References

  • Abbott, R. A., Ploubidis, G. B., Huppert, F. A., Kuh, D., Wadsworth, M. E., & Croudace, T. J. (2006). Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff’s psychological well-being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 1. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-76 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Akaike, L. S. (1987). Factor analysis and the AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–322. doi: 10.1007/BF02294359 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burns, R. A., & Machin, M. A. (2009). Investigating the structural validity of Ryff’s psychological well-being scales across two samples. Social Indicators Research, 93, 359–375. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9329-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chan, D. W. (2002). Stress, self-efficacy, social support, and psychological distress among prospective Chinese teachers in Hong Kong. Educational Psychology, 22, 557–569. doi: 10.1080/0144341022000023635 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheng, S. T., & Chan, A. C. M. (2005). Measuring psychological well-being in the Chinese. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1307–1316. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.08.013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kállay, É., & Rus, C. (2014). Psychometric properties of the 44-item version of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 15–21. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000163 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Keyes, C. L., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kwan, Y. K. (2010). Life satisfaction and self-assessed health among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 383–393. doi: 10.1007/s10902-009-9146-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Li, R. H. (2014). Reliability and validity of a shorter Chinese version for Ryff’s psychological well-being scale. Health Education Journal, 73, 446–452. doi: 10.1177/0017896913485743 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lindfors, P., Berntsson, L., & Lundberg, U. (2006). Factor structure of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in Swedish female and male white-collar workers. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1213–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.016 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liu, Q., Shono, M., & Kitamura, T. (2009). Psychological well‐being, depression, and anxiety in Japanese university students. Depression and Anxiety, 26, E99–E105. doi: 10.1002/da.20455 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1986). Negative item bias in ratings scales for preadolescent children: A cognitive-developmental phenomenon. Developmental Psychology, 22, 37–49. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.22.1.37 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moeini, B., Shafii, F., Hidarnia, A., Babaii, G. R., Birashk, B., & Allahverdipour, H. (2008). Perceived stress, self-efficacy and its relations to psychological well-being status in Iranian male high school students. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 36, 257–266. doi: 10.2224/sbp. 2008.36.2.257 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muris, P. (2001). A brief questionnaire for measuring self-efficacy in youths. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23, 145–149. doi: 10.1023/A:1010961119608 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Noom, M. J., Deković, M., & Meeus, W. H. (1999). Autonomy, attachment and psychosocial adjustment during adolescence: A double-edged sword? Journal of Adolescence, 22, 771–783. doi: 10.1006/jado.1999.0269 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Robitschek, C., Ashton, M. W., Spering, C. C., Geiger, N., Byers, D., Schotts, G. C., & Thoen, M. A. (2012). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Personal Growth Initiative Scale–II. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 274–287. doi: 10.1037/a0027310 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryff, C. D. (2013). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 10–28. doi: 10.1159/000353263 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryff, C. D., Lee, Y. H., Essex, M. J., & Schmutte, P. S. (1994). My children and me: Midlife evaluations of grown children and of self. Psychology and Aging, 9, 195–205. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.9.2.195 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2006). Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 1103–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.01.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. Retrieved from http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1176344136 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Springer, K. W., & Hauser, R. M. (2006). An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-Being: Method, mode, and measurement effects. Social Science Research, 35, 1080–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.07.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Springer, K. W., Hauser, R. M., & Freese, J. (2006). Bad news indeed for Ryff’s six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 1120–1131. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.01.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Springer, K. W., Pudrovska, T., & Hauser, R. M. (2011). Does psychological well-being change with age? Longitudinal tests of age variations and further exploration of the multidimensionality of Ryff’s model of psychological well-being. Social Science Research, 40, 392–398. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20593 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stewart, S. M., Lam, T. H., Betson, C., & Chung, S. F. (1999). Suicide ideation and its relationship to depressed mood in a community sample of adolescents in Hong Kong. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 29, 227–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278X.1999.tb00299.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Dierendonck, D. (2004). The construct validity of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-Being and its extension with spiritual well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 629–643. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00122-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, X., & Kanungo, R. N. (2004). Nationality, social network and psychological well-being: Expatriates in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 775–793. doi: 10.1093/geront/44.5.596 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar