Developing a Brief Version of Ryff’s Scale to Assess the Psychological Well-Being of Adolescents in Hong Kong
Abstract
Abstract. Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS) has provided a useful measure for investigating the eudaimonic well-being of adults and elderly people from the positive psychology perspective. However, its length and structure, and its applicability to younger populations have raised important concerns in the assessment with Chinese adolescents. Although different shortened versions of PWBS in various languages have been developed, they were mostly not adapted for use with adolescents and did not have satisfactory model fit and internal consistencies. This investigation aimed to develop a brief Chinese PWBS version to assess the eudaimonic well-being of adolescents in Hong Kong. Two studies related to scale development and validation involving three samples of 1,433 adolescents from Hong Kong were reported. Item selection, construct validation, model testing, and rewording of items to suit adolescent use were guided by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses as well as correlations with external scales assessing similar PWBS content dimensions. The resulting 24-item Chinese PWBS includes only positively keyed items in simple language suitable for adolescent use. Validation and cross-validation results have demonstrated that it is a brief, valid, and reliable scale for assessing adolescent psychological well-being in six dimensions in the Chinese context.
References
2006). Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff’s psychological well-being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 1. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-76
(1987). Factor analysis and the AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–322. doi: 10.1007/BF02294359
(2009). Investigating the structural validity of Ryff’s psychological well-being scales across two samples. Social Indicators Research, 93, 359–375. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9329-1
(2002). Stress, self-efficacy, social support, and psychological distress among prospective Chinese teachers in Hong Kong. Educational Psychology, 22, 557–569. doi: 10.1080/0144341022000023635
(2005). Measuring psychological well-being in the Chinese. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1307–1316. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.08.013
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
(2014). Psychometric properties of the 44-item version of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 15–21. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000163
(2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
(2011). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
(2010). Life satisfaction and self-assessed health among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 383–393. doi: 10.1007/s10902-009-9146-5
(2014). Reliability and validity of a shorter Chinese version for Ryff’s psychological well-being scale. Health Education Journal, 73, 446–452. doi: 10.1177/0017896913485743
(2006). Factor structure of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in Swedish female and male white-collar workers. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1213–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.016
(2009). Psychological well‐being, depression, and anxiety in Japanese university students. Depression and Anxiety, 26, E99–E105. doi: 10.1002/da.20455
(1986). Negative item bias in ratings scales for preadolescent children: A cognitive-developmental phenomenon. Developmental Psychology, 22, 37–49. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.22.1.37
(2008). Perceived stress, self-efficacy and its relations to psychological well-being status in Iranian male high school students. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 36, 257–266. doi: 10.2224/sbp. 2008.36.2.257
(2001). A brief questionnaire for measuring self-efficacy in youths. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23, 145–149. doi: 10.1023/A:1010961119608
(2010). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
(1999). Autonomy, attachment and psychosocial adjustment during adolescence: A double-edged sword? Journal of Adolescence, 22, 771–783. doi: 10.1006/jado.1999.0269
(2012). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
. (2012). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Personal Growth Initiative Scale–II. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 274–287. doi: 10.1037/a0027310
(1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
(2013). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 10–28. doi: 10.1159/000353263
(1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
(1994). My children and me: Midlife evaluations of grown children and of self. Psychology and Aging, 9, 195–205. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.9.2.195
(2006). Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 1103–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.01.002
(1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. Retrieved from http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1176344136
(2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
(2006). An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-Being: Method, mode, and measurement effects. Social Science Research, 35, 1080–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.07.004
(2006). Bad news indeed for Ryff’s six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 1120–1131. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.01.003
(2011). Does psychological well-being change with age? Longitudinal tests of age variations and further exploration of the multidimensionality of Ryff’s model of psychological well-being. Social Science Research, 40, 392–398. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20593
(2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
(1999). Suicide ideation and its relationship to depressed mood in a community sample of adolescents in Hong Kong. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 29, 227–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278X.1999.tb00299.x
(2004). The construct validity of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-Being and its extension with spiritual well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 629–643. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00122-3
(2004). Nationality, social network and psychological well-being: Expatriates in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 775–793. doi: 10.1093/geront/44.5.596
(