Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Factor Structure of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale

A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Published Online:May 04, 2017https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000405

Abstract

Abstract. The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) is one of the most widely used instruments for measuring relationship quality. Considering the discrepancies across studies regarding the relationship of the underlying constructs of the DAS, the aim of the present study was to examine the factor structure of the scale by applying bifactor models using confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) approaches. The sample consisted of 483 couples recruited in Hungary. The analysis revealed that the bifactor-ESEM yielded the best fit to the data (CFI = .90, RMSEA = .05, WRMR = .88). Further, strict invariance between the sexes was observed for this model. Omega hierarchical coefficients indicated outstanding reliability for the general factor (.86), acceptable estimates for the Dyadic Consensus (.60) and Cohesion (.57) subdomains, but poor reliability for the Dyadic Satisfaction (.22) and Affectional Expression (.36) factors; suggesting that the individual interpretation of these latter two subconstructs must be made with caution.

References

  • Antill, J. K., & Cotton, S. (1982). Spanier’s Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Some confirmatory analyses. Australian Psychologist, 17, 181–189. doi: 10.1080/00050068208255933 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. doi: 10.1080/10705510903008204 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baillargeon, J., Dubois, G., & Marineau, R. (1986). Traduction française de l’Échelle d’ajustement dyadique.[French translation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale] Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 18, 25–34. doi: 10.1037/h0079949 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brunner, M., Nagy, G., & Wilhelm, O. (2012). A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs. Journal of Personality, 80, 796–846. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00749.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Busby, D. M., Christensen, C., Crane, D. R., & Larson, J. H. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 289–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00163.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cano-Prous, A., Martín-Lanas, R., Moyá-Querejeta, J., Beunza-Nuin, M. I., Lahortiga-Ramos, F., & García-Granero, M. (2014). Psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14, 137–144. doi: 10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70047-X First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J. -P., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality, 80, 219–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00739.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Christensen, A., Atkins, D. C., Berns, S., Wheeler, J., Baucom, D. H., & Simpson, L. E. (2004). Traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy for significantly and chronically distressed married couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 176–191. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.176 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Christensen, A., & Shenk, J. L. (1991). Communication, conflict, and psychological distance in nondistressed, clinic, and divorcing couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 458–463. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.59.3.458 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Crane, D. R., Busby, D. M., & Larson, J. H. (1991). A factor analysis of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale with distressed and nondistressed couples. American Journal of Family Therapy, 19, 60–66. doi: 10.1080/01926189108250835 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cuenca, M. L., Graña, J. L., Peña, M. E., & Andreu, J. M. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) in a community sample of couples. Psicothema, 25, 536–541. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.85 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eddy, J. M., Heyman, R. E., & Weiss, R. L. (1991). An empirical evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Exploring the differences between marital “satisfaction” and “adjustment”. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 199–220. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, J. M., Liu, Y. J., & Jeziorski, J. L. (2006). The Dyadic Adjustment Scale: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 701–717. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00284.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kazak, A. E., Jarmas, A., & Snitzer, L. (1988). The assessment of marital satisfaction: An evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 2, 82–91. doi: 10.1037/h0080475 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.472 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kouros, C., Papp, L., & Cummings, E. (2008). Interrelations and moderators of longitudinal links between marital satisfaction and depressive symptoms among couples in established relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 667–677. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.5.667 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kurdek, L. A. (1992). Dimensionality of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Evidence from heterosexual and homosexual couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 22–35. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.6.1.22 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936–949. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthen, B. O., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the Big-Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491. doi: 10.1037/a0019227 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Norup, D. A., & Elklit, A. (2013). Post-traumatic stress disorder in partners of people with epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior, 27, 225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.11.039 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reise, S. P. (2013). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667–696. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 129–140. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.725437 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rychik, J., Donaghue, D. D., Levy, S., Fajardo, C., Combs, J., Zhang, X., … Diamond, G. S. (2013). Maternal psychological stress after prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Journal of Pediatrics, 162, 302–307. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.07.023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sabourin, S., Bouchard, G., Wright, J., Lussier, Y., & Boucher, C. (1988). L’influence du sexe sur l’invariance factorielle de l’echelle d’adjustement dyadique [The effect of sex on the factorial invariance of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale]. Science et Comportement, 18, 187–201. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sabourin, S., Lussier, Y., Laplante, B., & Wright, J. (1990). Unidimensional and multidimensional models of dyadic adjustment: A hierarchical reconciliation. Psychological Assessment, 2, 333–337. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.2.3.333 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sharpley, C. F., & Cross, D. G. (1982). A psychometric evaluation of the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 739–741. doi: 10.2307/351594 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shek, D. T. L., & Cheung, C. K. (2008). Dimensionality of the Chinese Dyadic Adjustment Scale based on confirmatory factor analyses. Social Indicators Research, 86, 201–212. doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9108-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • South, S. C., Krueger, R. F., & Iacono, W. G. (2009). Factorial invariance of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale across gender. Psychological Assessment, 21, 622–628. doi: 10.1037/a0017572 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38, 15–28. doi: 10.2307/350547 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spanier, G. B. (1988). Assessing the strengths of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 2, 92–94. doi: 10.1037/h0080477 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spanier, G. B. (1989). Manual for the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. North Tonowanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Spanier, G. B., & Thompson, L. (1982). A confirmatory analysis of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marriage and Family, 44, 731–738. doi: 10.2307/351593 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vajda, D., Rózsa, S., Sz. Makó, H., & Kiss, E. Cs. (2016). A Diádikus Alkalmazkodás Skála (DAS) magyar változatának pszichometriai jellemzői [Psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale]. Applied Psychology in Hungary, 16, 101–121. doi: 10.17627/ALKPSZICH.2016.1.101 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yu, C.-Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (Dissertation). Los Angeles, CA: University of California. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s Alpha, Revelle’s Beta, and McDonald’s Omega h: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133. doi: 10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar