The Field of Psychological Assessment: Where it Stands and Where it’s Going – A Personal Analysis of Foci, Gaps, and Implications for EJPA
References
2006). Three options for citation tracking. Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3, 7. doi: 10.1186/1742-5581-3-7
(2008). From theory to intervention: Mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Applied Psychology, 57, 660–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00341.x
(2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and analytical framework. Science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264255425-en
. (2016). Tests of scholastic aptitude cover reasoning facets sufficiently. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 215–219. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000247
(2013). Measuring and supporting learning in games. Stealth assessment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
(2015). The Dutch Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. Is the use of the subscales justified? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31, 263–271. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000233
(2013). Lost in translation. Thoughts regarding the translation of existing psychological measures into other languages. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 81–83. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000167
(